These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34978970)

  • 21. Genetic quality and sexual selection: an integrated framework for good genes and compatible genes.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):19-38. PubMed ID: 15643948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Within-Generation Polygenic Selection Shapes Fitness-Related Traits across Environments in Juvenile Sea Bream.
    Rey C; Darnaude A; Ferraton F; Guinand B; Bonhomme F; Bierne N; Gagnaire PA
    Genes (Basel); 2020 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 32272597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ecological and developmental context of natural selection: maternal effects and thermally induced plasticity in the frog Bombina orientalis.
    Kaplan RH; Phillips PC
    Evolution; 2006 Jan; 60(1):142-56. PubMed ID: 16568639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Within-population variation in female mating preference affects the opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, but things are not as simple as expected.
    Millan CH; Machado G; Muniz DG
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Nov; 33(11):1579-1592. PubMed ID: 32871625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Opposing selection and environmental variation modify optimal timing of breeding.
    Tarwater CE; Beissinger SR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Sep; 110(38):15365-70. PubMed ID: 24003118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The evolutionary consequences of habitat fragmentation: Body morphology and coloration differentiation among brook trout populations of varying size.
    Zastavniouk C; Weir LK; Fraser DJ
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Sep; 7(17):6850-6862. PubMed ID: 28904765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The role of ecology in speciation by sexual selection: a systematic empirical review.
    Scordato ES; Symes LB; Mendelson TC; Safran RJ
    J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():782-94. PubMed ID: 25149254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing complex fitness surfaces: among-population variation in mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Am Nat; 2008 Apr; 171(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 18254685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Asymmetry of genetic variation in fitness-related traits: apparent stabilizing selection on g(max).
    McGuigan K; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2009 Nov; 63(11):2838-47. PubMed ID: 19545265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. An integrated analysis of phenotypic selection on insect body size and development time.
    Eck DJ; Shaw RG; Geyer CJ; Kingsolver JG
    Evolution; 2015 Sep; 69(9):2525-32. PubMed ID: 26257167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. How phenotypic variation and life history trait correlation enhance mean fitness in prey populations.
    Hartt L; Haefner JW
    Theor Popul Biol; 1998 Aug; 54(1):50-61. PubMed ID: 9680489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Sexual selection, phenotypic plasticity and female reproductive output.
    Fox RJ; Fromhage L; Jennions MD
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2019 Mar; 374(1768):20180184. PubMed ID: 30966965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Artificial selection reveals sex differences in the genetic basis of sexual attractiveness.
    Gosden TP; Reddiex AJ; Chenoweth SF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2018 May; 115(21):5498-5503. PubMed ID: 29735676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. What Are the Environmental Determinants of Phenotypic Selection? A Meta-analysis of Experimental Studies.
    Caruso CM; Martin RA; Sletvold N; Morrissey MB; Wade MJ; Augustine KE; Carlson SM; MacColl ADC; Siepielski AM; Kingsolver JG
    Am Nat; 2017 Sep; 190(3):363-376. PubMed ID: 28829646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reducing mutation load through sexual selection on males.
    McGuigan K; Petfield D; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2011 Oct; 65(10):2816-29. PubMed ID: 21967424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Experimental evolution reveals differential evolutionary trajectories in male and female activity levels in response to sexual selection and metapopulation structure.
    Canal D; Garamszegi LZ; Rodriguez-Exposito E; Garcia-Gonzalez F
    Evolution; 2022 Jun; 76(6):1347-1359. PubMed ID: 35483712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A critical review of adaptive genetic variation in Atlantic salmon: implications for conservation.
    Garcia de Leaniz C; Fleming IA; Einum S; Verspoor E; Jordan WC; Consuegra S; Aubin-Horth N; Lajus D; Letcher BH; Youngson AF; Webb JH; Vøllestad LA; Villanueva B; Ferguson A; Quinn TP
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2007 May; 82(2):173-211. PubMed ID: 17437557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The roles of natural and sexual selection during adaptation to a novel environment.
    Rundle HD; Chenoweth SF; Blows MW
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2218-25. PubMed ID: 17236415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Body and wing size, but not wing shape, vary along a large-scale latitudinal gradient in a damselfly.
    Outomuro D; Golab MJ; Johansson F; Sniegula S
    Sci Rep; 2021 Sep; 11(1):18642. PubMed ID: 34545136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Darwin, sexual selection, and the brain.
    Ryan MJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2021 Feb; 118(8):. PubMed ID: 33593899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.