339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34980068)
1. Biomechanical feasibility of semi-rigid stabilization and semi-rigid lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
Wong CE; Hu HT; Kao LH; Liu CJ; Chen KC; Huang KY
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Jan; 23(1):10. PubMed ID: 34980068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical comparison of multilevel lateral interbody fusion with and without supplementary instrumentation: a three-dimensional finite element study.
Liu X; Ma J; Park P; Huang X; Xie N; Ye X
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Feb; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 28153036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical Evaluation of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Coflex-F and Pedicle Screw Fixation: Finite Element Analysis of Static and Vibration Conditions.
Zhu J; Shen H; Cui Y; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Liu W
Orthop Surg; 2022 Sep; 14(9):2339-2349. PubMed ID: 35946442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems.
Fan W; Guo LX; Zhang M
Eur Spine J; 2021 Aug; 30(8):2342-2350. PubMed ID: 33948750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of an interspinous fusion device as a stand-alone and as supplemental fixation to posterior expandable interbody cages in the lumbar spine.
Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Lee WE; Volkov A; Vrionis FD
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Feb; 20(2):209-19. PubMed ID: 24286528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of lateral lumbar interbody fusion with secondary augmentation.
Reis MT; Reyes PM; Bse ; Altun I; Newcomb AG; Singh V; Chang SW; Kelly BP; Crawford NR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):720-726. PubMed ID: 27391398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of strategies for adjacent segment disease after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: is the extension of pedicle screws necessary?
Liang Z; Cui J; Zhang J; He J; Tang J; Ren H; Ye L; Liang D; Jiang X
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):117. PubMed ID: 32085708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral pedicle screw fixation provides superior biomechanical stability in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a finite element study.
Ambati DV; Wright EK; Lehman RA; Kang DG; Wagner SC; Dmitriev AE
Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1812-22. PubMed ID: 24983669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical effects of hybrid stabilization on the risk of proximal adjacent-segment degeneration following lumbar spinal fusion using an interspinous device or a pedicle screw-based dynamic fixator.
Lee CH; Kim YE; Lee HJ; Kim DG; Kim CH
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):643-649. PubMed ID: 28937328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element biomechanical analysis of 3D printed intervertebral fusion cage in osteoporotic population.
Wu J; Miao J; Chen G; Xu H; Wen W; Xu H; Liu L
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Feb; 25(1):129. PubMed ID: 38347518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finite Element Analysis of a New Pedicle Screw-Plate System for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Li J; Shang J; Zhou Y; Li C; Liu H
PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0144637. PubMed ID: 26649749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.
Sim HB; Murovic JA; Cho BY; Lim TJ; Park J
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Jun; 12(6):700-8. PubMed ID: 20515358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation -- a finite element analysis.
Choi KC; Ryu KS; Lee SH; Kim YH; Lee SJ; Park CK
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jul; 14():220. PubMed ID: 23890389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: the effect of various instrumentation techniques on the flexibility of the lumbar spine.
Harris BM; Hilibrand AS; Savas PE; Pellegrino A; Vaccaro AR; Siegler S; Albert TJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Feb; 29(4):E65-70. PubMed ID: 15094547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Biomechanical stability of unilateral pedicle screw fixation on cadaveric model simulated two-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion].
Dong JW; Feng F; Zhao WD; Rong LM; Liu XM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 May; 49(5):436-9. PubMed ID: 21733402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical comparison of an interspinous fusion device and bilateral pedicle screw system as additional fixation for lateral lumbar interbody fusion.
Doulgeris JJ; Aghayev K; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Lee WE; Vrionis FD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2015 Feb; 30(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 25577548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of single-level interbody fusion with different internal fixation rod materials: a finite element analysis.
Hsieh YY; Tsuang FY; Kuo YJ; Chen CH; Chiang CJ; Lin CL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Feb; 21(1):100. PubMed ID: 32059656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical evaluation of a new pedicle screw-based posterior dynamic stabilization device (Awesome Rod System)--a finite element analysis.
Chen CS; Huang CH; Shih SL
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Apr; 16():81. PubMed ID: 25880231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanics of extreme lateral interbody fusion with different internal fixation methods: a finite element analysis.
Li XH; She LJ; Zhang W; Cheng XD; Fan JP
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2022 Feb; 23(1):134. PubMed ID: 35139843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
