241 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34980178)
1. Evaluation of plan robustness on the dosimetry of volumetric arc radiotherapy (VMAT) with set-up uncertainty in Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) radiotherapy.
Ding Z; Xiang X; Zeng Q; Ma J; Dai Z; Kang K; Bi S
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jan; 17(1):1. PubMed ID: 34980178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Robustness of VMAT to setup errors in postmastectomy radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer: Impact of bolus thickness.
He Y; Chen S; Gao X; Fu L; Kang Z; Liu J; Shi L; Li Y
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280456. PubMed ID: 36693073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative analysis of SmartArc-based dual arc volumetric-modulated arc radiotherapy (VMAT) versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Lee TF; Chao PJ; Ting HM; Lo SH; Wang YW; Tuan CC; Fang FM; Su TJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 12(4):3587. PubMed ID: 22089015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose-volume histogram prediction in volumetric modulated arc therapy for nasopharyngeal carcinomas based on uniform-intensity radiation with equal angle intervals.
Zhuang Y; Han J; Chen L; Liu X
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 64(23):23NT03. PubMed ID: 31683261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric comparison between VMAT plans using the fast-rotating O-ring linac with dual-layer stacked MLC and helical tomotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Ju SG; Ahn YC; Kim YB; Kim JM; Kwon DY; Park BS; Yang K
Radiat Oncol; 2022 Sep; 17(1):155. PubMed ID: 36096874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multi-institutional investigation into the robustness of intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans to delivery errors.
May L; Hardcastle N; Hernandez V; Saez J; Rosenfeld A; Poder J
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):910-921. PubMed ID: 38141043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Qiu J; Lv B; Fu M; Wang X; Zheng X; Zhuo W
Head Neck; 2017 Dec; 39(12):2519-2527. PubMed ID: 28963789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of treatment plan quality for a prototype biology-guided radiotherapy system in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Han C; Da Silva AJ; Liang J; Wohlers C; Huntzinger C; Neylon JP; Du D; Wong JYC; Liu A
Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 33272744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Beam Angle Selection Method to Improve Plan Robustness Against Position Error in Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Left-Sided Breast Cancer.
Ding Z; Kang K; Yuan Q; Zhang W; Sang Y
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2024; 23():15330338241259633. PubMed ID: 38887092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single arc volumetric-modulated arc therapy is sufficient for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a dosimetric comparison with dual arc VMAT and dynamic MLC and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy.
Ning ZH; Mu JM; Jin JX; Li XD; Li QL; Gu WD; Huang J; Han Y; Pei HL
Radiat Oncol; 2013 Oct; 8():237. PubMed ID: 24125432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric Comparisons of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Tomotherapy for Early T-Stage Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Li S; Zhou Q; Shen LF; Li H; Li ZZ; Yang Z; Lei MJ; Yang XY; Zhang ZJ; Hu YM; Jin ZF; Liu G; Lv ZP; Huang XQ
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():2653497. PubMed ID: 29967769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility of constant dose rate VMAT in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer patients.
Yu W; Shang H; Xie C; Han C; Yi J; Zhou Y; Jin X
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Nov; 9():235. PubMed ID: 25366034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of automatic VMAT plans in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Zhang Q; Ou L; Peng Y; Yu H; Wang L; Zhang S
Strahlenther Onkol; 2021 Mar; 197(3):177-187. PubMed ID: 32488293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development of a Monte Carlo based robustness calculation and evaluation tool.
Loebner HA; Volken W; Mueller S; Bertholet J; Mackeprang PH; Guyer G; Aebersold DM; Stampanoni MFM; Manser P; Fix MK
Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 49(7):4780-4793. PubMed ID: 35451087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Plan Robustness Using Hybrid Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) and Volumetric Arc Modulation Radiotherapy (VMAT) for Left-Sided Breast Cancer.
Ding Z; Zeng Q; Kang K; Xu M; Xiang X; Liu C
Bioengineering (Basel); 2022 Mar; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 35447691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of dose-volume histogram prediction in biologically related models for nasopharyngeal carcinomas treatment planning.
Cao W; Zhuang Y; Chen L; Liu X
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Sep; 15(1):216. PubMed ID: 32933543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robust optimization in lung treatment plans accounting for geometric uncertainty.
Zhang X; Rong Y; Morrill S; Fang J; Narayanasamy G; Galhardo E; Maraboyina S; Croft C; Xia F; Penagaricano J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 May; 19(3):19-26. PubMed ID: 29524301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a mixed beam therapy for postmastectomy breast cancer patients: Bolus electron conformal therapy combined with intensity modulated photon radiotherapy and volumetric modulated photon arc therapy.
Zhang R; Heins D; Sanders M; Guo B; Hogstrom K
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):2912-2924. PubMed ID: 29749075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
