344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34981236)
1. There is no correlation between a delayed gastric conduit emptying and the occurrence of an anastomotic leakage after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Babic B; Schiffmann LM; Fuchs HF; Mueller DT; Schmidt T; Mallmann C; Mielke L; Frebel A; Schiller P; Bludau M; Chon SH; Schroeder W; Bruns CJ
Surg Endosc; 2022 Sep; 36(9):6777-6783. PubMed ID: 34981236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A pilot randomized controlled trial on the utility of gastric conditioning in the prevention of esophagogastric anastomotic leak after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy. The APIL_2013 Trial.
Mils K; Miró M; Farran L; Videla S; Alba E; Estremiana F; Bettonica C; Aranda H
Int J Surg; 2022 Oct; 106():106921. PubMed ID: 36116675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. End-to-side circular stapled versus side-to-side linear stapled intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis following minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes.
Fabbi M; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Fumagalli Romario U; Gandini S; Feenstra M; De Pascale S; Gisbertz SS
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Nov; 407(7):2681-2692. PubMed ID: 35639136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improved anastomotic leakage rates after the "flap and wrap" reconstruction in Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer.
Slaman AE; Eshuis WJ; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS
Dis Esophagus; 2022 Dec; 36(1):. PubMed ID: 35724430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted esophagectomy with robot-sewn intrathoracic anastomosis (Ivor Lewis): surgical technique and early results.
Marano A; Salomone S; Pellegrino L; Geretto P; Robella M; Borghi F
Updates Surg; 2023 Jun; 75(4):941-952. PubMed ID: 36510101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. End-to-end versus end-to-side esophagogastrostomy after esophageal cancer resection: a prospective randomized study.
Nederlof N; Tilanus HW; Tran TC; Hop WC; Wijnhoven BP; de Jonge J
Ann Surg; 2011 Aug; 254(2):226-33. PubMed ID: 21725230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anterior gastric wall anastomosis may lead to lower rate of delayed gastric emptying after minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy: a retrospective cohort study.
Uzun E; d'Amore A; Berlth F; Mann C; Tagkalos E; Hadzijusufovic E; Lang H; Grimminger PP
Surg Endosc; 2024 Apr; 38(4):1950-1957. PubMed ID: 38334779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anatomic patterns of anastomotic leaks after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy for cancer: Impact on management and outcomes.
Laydi M; Doussot A; Lakkis Z; Mathieu P; Gandon A; Dubois C; Degisors S; Martin L; Heyd B; Piessen G
Surgery; 2023 Aug; 174(2):247-251. PubMed ID: 37270298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fashioning esophagogastric anastomosis in robotic Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy: a multicenter experience.
Milone M; Bianchi PP; Cianchi F; Coratti A; D'Amore A; De Manzoni G; De Pasqual CA; Formisano G; Jovine E; Morelli L; Offi M; Peri A; Pietrabissa A; Staderini F; Tribuzi A; Giacopuzzi S
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2024 Mar; 409(1):103. PubMed ID: 38517543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcome of Self-Expanding Metal Stents in the Treatment of Anastomotic Leaks After Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy.
Plum PS; Herbold T; Berlth F; Christ H; Alakus H; Bludau M; Chang DH; Bruns CJ; Hölscher AH; Chon SH
World J Surg; 2019 Mar; 43(3):862-869. PubMed ID: 30377723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Circular stapling anastomosis with indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Shishido Y; Matsunaga T; Makinoya M; Miyauchi W; Shimizu S; Miyatani K; Uejima C; Morimoto M; Murakami Y; Hanaki T; Kihara K; Yamamoto M; Tokuyasu N; Takano S; Sakamoto T; Saito H; Hasegawa T; Fujiwara Y
BMC Surg; 2022 Apr; 22(1):152. PubMed ID: 35488244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Surface microdialysis measures local tissue metabolism after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy; an attempt to predict anastomotic defect.
Åkesson O; Abrahamsson P; Johansson G; Haney M; Falkenback D; Hermansson M; Jeremiasen M; Johansson J
Dis Esophagus; 2023 Jul; 36(8):. PubMed ID: 36572400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Perfusion assessment by fluorescence time curves in esophagectomy with gastric conduit reconstruction: a prospective clinical study.
Joosten JJ; Slooter MD; van den Elzen RM; Bloemen PR; Gisbertz SS; Eshuis WJ; Daams F; de Bruin DM; van Berge Henegouwen MI
Surg Endosc; 2023 Aug; 37(8):6343-6352. PubMed ID: 37208482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Techniques and short-term outcomes for total minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophageal resection in distal esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancers: pooled data from six European centers.
Straatman J; van der Wielen N; Nieuwenhuijzen GA; Rosman C; Roig J; Scheepers JJ; Cuesta MA; Luyer MD; van Berge Henegouwen MI; van Workum F; Gisbertz SS; van der Peet DL
Surg Endosc; 2017 Jan; 31(1):119-126. PubMed ID: 27129563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic Side-to-Side and End-to-Side Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis of Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy for Cancer.
Zhang H; Wang Z; Zheng Y; Geng Y; Wang F; Chen LQ; Wang Y
World J Surg; 2019 Dec; 43(12):3074-3082. PubMed ID: 31538252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Anastomotic Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Total Minimally Invasive Transthoracic Esophagectomy: Results From the EsoBenchmark Database.
Schröder W; Raptis DA; Schmidt HM; Gisbertz SS; Moons J; Asti E; Luyer MDP; Hölscher AH; Schneider PM; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Nafteux P; Nilsson M; Räsanen J; Palazzo F; Mercer S; Bonavina L; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Wijjnhoven BPL; Pattyn P; Grimminger PP; Bruns CJ; Gutschow CA
Ann Surg; 2019 Nov; 270(5):820-826. PubMed ID: 31634181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of end-to-side hand-sewn and side-to-side stapled cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients with lower thoracic esophageal cancer undergoing transhiatal esophagectomy: an Iranian retrospective cohort study.
Rasihashemi SZ; Ramouz A; Beheshtirouy S; Amini H
BMC Gastroenterol; 2020 Jul; 20(1):250. PubMed ID: 32736599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early endoscopic assessment after esophagectomy can predict anastomotic complications: a novel scoring system.
Åkesson O; Heyman I; Johansson J; Rissler P; Falkenback D
Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1903-1909. PubMed ID: 33835253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Circular Stapled Esophagogastric Anastomosis in Esophagectomy: No Differences in Anastomotic Insufficiency and Stricture Rates Between the 25 mm and 28 mm Circular Stapler.
Tagkalos E; van der Sluis PC; Uzun E; Berlth F; Staubitz J; Gockel I; van Hillegersberg R; Lang H; Grimminger PP
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Sep; 25(9):2242-2249. PubMed ID: 33506342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy with Linear Stapled Anastomosis Associated with Low Leak and Stricture Rates.
Kukar M; Ben-David K; Peng JS; Attwood K; Thomas RM; Hennon M; Nwogu C; Hochwald SN
J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Aug; 24(8):1729-1735. PubMed ID: 31317458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
