118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34983290)
1. Does the type of biopsy used for diagnosis impact subsequent treatment selection in prostate cancer patients?
Levin BA; Lama DJ; Sussman J; Guan T; Rao M; Tobler J; Verma S; Sidana A
Aging Male; 2022 Dec; 25(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 34983290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prognostic Implications of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Concomitant Systematic Biopsy in Predicting Biochemical Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy.
Gandaglia G; Ploussard G; Valerio M; Marra G; Moschini M; Martini A; Roumiguié M; Fossati N; Stabile A; Beauval JB; Malavaud B; Scuderi S; Barletta F; Afferi L; Rakauskas A; Gontero P; Mattei A; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Dec; 3(6):739-747. PubMed ID: 32847747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate Cancer Risk Assessment in Biopsy-naïve Patients: The Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound (TRUS) Fusion Biopsy and Systematic TRUS Biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Gayet M; Verbeek JF; Engelbrecht MRW; Savci-Heijink CD; Jager GJ; Gielens MPM; van der Linden H; Beerlage HP; de Reijke TM; Wijkstra H; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2018 Jun; 1(2):109-117. PubMed ID: 31100233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Suitability of conventional systematic vs. MRI-guided targeted biopsy approaches to assess surgical treatment delay for radical prostatectomy.
Kachanov M; Budäus L; Witt JH; Wagner C; Zinke J; Fangmeyer B; Schütte A; Spieker T; Beyersdorff D; Graefen M; Rachubinski P; Leyh-Bannurah SR
World J Urol; 2022 Dec; 40(12):2955-2961. PubMed ID: 36357604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. How does a prebiopsy mri approach for prostate cancer diagnosis affect prostatectomy upgrade rates?
Sussman J; Haj-Hamed M; Talarek J; Verma S; Sidana A
Urol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):784.e11-784.e16. PubMed ID: 33867247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of TRUS and combined MRI-targeted plus systematic prostate biopsy for the concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.
Aslan G; Çelik S; Sözen S; Akdoğan B; İzol V; Yücel Bilen C; Sahin B; Türkeri L;
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Mar; 75(3):e13797. PubMed ID: 33113261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Suboptimal Prediction of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy Specimens by mpMRI-Targeted Biopsy.
Karsiyakali N; Ozgen MB; Ozveren B; Akbal C; Dincer A; Durak H; Turkeri L
Urology; 2021 Feb; 148():217-223. PubMed ID: 32871139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve men: direct comparison of systematic biopsy, multiparametric MRI- and contrast-ultrasound-dispersion imaging-targeted biopsy.
Mannaerts CK; Engelbrecht MRW; Postema AW; van Kollenburg RAA; Hoeks CMA; Savci-Heijink CD; Van Sloun RJG; Wildeboer RR; De Reijke TM; Mischi M; Wijkstra H
BJU Int; 2020 Oct; 126(4):481-493. PubMed ID: 32315112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Value of 3-Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and targeted biopsy for improved risk stratification in patients considered for active surveillance.
Pessoa RR; Viana PC; Mattedi RL; Guglielmetti GB; Cordeiro MD; Coelho RF; Nahas WC; Srougi M
BJU Int; 2017 Apr; 119(4):535-542. PubMed ID: 27500389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Detection of Gleason 6 prostate cancer in patients with clinically significant prostate cancer on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
Chaloupka M; Bischoff R; Pfitzinger P; Lellig E; Ledderose S; Buchner A; Schlenker B; Stief C; Clevert DA; Apfelbeck M
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2019; 73(1):105-111. PubMed ID: 31561351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fusion prostate biopsy outperforms 12-core systematic prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative systematic biopsy: A multi-institutional analysis.
Sidana A; Watson MJ; George AK; Rastinehad AR; Vourganti S; Rais-Bahrami S; Muthigi A; Maruf M; Gordetsky JB; Nix JW; Merino MJ; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
Urol Oncol; 2018 Jul; 36(7):341.e1-341.e7. PubMed ID: 29753548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extent of High-Grade Prostatic Adenocarcinoma in Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy Enhances Prediction of Pathologic Stage.
Paulson N; Vollmer RT; Humphrey PA; Sprenkle PC; Onofrey J; Huber S; Amirkhiz K; Levi AW
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2022 Jan; 146(2):201-204. PubMed ID: 34015819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. How Often Does Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detect Prostate Cancer Missed by Transrectal Ultrasound?
Herlemann A; Overland MR; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Westphalen AC; Carroll PR; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR
Eur Urol Focus; 2021 Nov; 7(6):1268-1273. PubMed ID: 32868222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen.
Radtke JP; Schwab C; Wolf MB; Freitag MT; Alt CD; Kesch C; Popeneciu IV; Huettenbrink C; Gasch C; Klein T; Bonekamp D; Duensing S; Roth W; Schueler S; Stock C; Schlemmer HP; Roethke M; Hohenfellner M; Hadaschik BA
Eur Urol; 2016 Nov; 70(5):846-853. PubMed ID: 26810346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Goel S; Shoag JE; Gross MD; Al Hussein Al Awamlh B; Robinson B; Khani F; Baltich Nelson B; Margolis DJ; Hu JC
Eur Urol Oncol; 2020 Feb; 3(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 31492650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing Combined Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Targeted and Systematic Biopsy Strategies: Sparing the Multiparametric MRI-Negative Transitional Zone in Presence of Exclusively Peripheral Multiparametric MRI-Suspect Lesions.
Kachanov M; Leyh-Bannurah SR; Roberts MJ; Sauer M; Beyersdorff D; Boiko S; Maurer T; Steuber T; Graefen M; Budäus L
J Urol; 2022 Feb; 207(2):333-340. PubMed ID: 34555925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric-Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Improves Agreement Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Score.
Porpiglia F; DE Luca S; Passera R; Manfredi M; Mele F; Bollito E; DE Pascale A; Cossu M; Aimar R; Veltri A
Anticancer Res; 2016 Sep; 36(9):4833-9. PubMed ID: 27630337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can saturation biopsy predict prostate cancer localization in radical prostatectomy specimens: a correlative study and implications for focal therapy.
Falzarano SM; Zhou M; Hernandez AV; Moussa AS; Jones JS; Magi-Galluzzi C
Urology; 2010 Sep; 76(3):682-7. PubMed ID: 20206973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
