214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34983569)
1. Digital research data: from analysis of existing standards to a scientific foundation for a modular metadata schema in nanosafety.
Elberskirch L; Binder K; Riefler N; Sofranko A; Liebing J; Minella CB; Mädler L; Razum M; van Thriel C; Unfried K; Schins RPF; Kraegeloh A
Part Fibre Toxicol; 2022 Jan; 19(1):1. PubMed ID: 34983569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. How Structured Metadata Acquisition Contributes to the Reproducibility of Nanosafety Studies: Evaluation by a Round-Robin Test.
Elberskirch L; Sofranko A; Liebing J; Riefler N; Binder K; Bonatto Minella C; Razum M; Mädler L; Unfried K; Schins RPF; Kraegeloh A; van Thriel C
Nanomaterials (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(7):. PubMed ID: 35407172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Metadata Stewardship in Nanosafety Research: Community-Driven Organisation of Metadata Schemas to Support FAIR Nanoscience Data.
Papadiamantis AG; Klaessig FC; Exner TE; Hofer S; Hofstaetter N; Himly M; Williams MA; Doganis P; Hoover MD; Afantitis A; Melagraki G; Nolan TS; Rumble J; Maier D; Lynch I
Nanomaterials (Basel); 2020 Oct; 10(10):. PubMed ID: 33076428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. FAIR assessment of nanosafety data reusability with community standards.
Ammar A; Evelo C; Willighagen E
Sci Data; 2024 May; 11(1):503. PubMed ID: 38755173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. NExtSEEK: Extending SEEK for Active Management of Interoperable Metadata.
Pradhan D; Ding H; Zhu J; Engelward BP; Levine SS
J Biomol Tech; 2022 Apr; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 35836998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Obstacles to the reuse of study metadata in ClinicalTrials.gov.
Miron L; Gonçalves RS; Musen MA
Sci Data; 2020 Dec; 7(1):443. PubMed ID: 33339830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. OMeta: an ontology-based, data-driven metadata tracking system.
Singh I; Kuscuoglu M; Harkins DM; Sutton G; Fouts DE; Nelson KE
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):8. PubMed ID: 30612540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Management of Metadata Types in Basic Cardiological Research.
Kusch H; Kossen R; Suhr M; Freckmann L; Weber L; Henke C; Lehmann C; Rheinländer S; Aschenbrandt G; Kühlborn LK; Marzec B; Menzel J; Schwappach B; Zelarayán LC; Cyganek L; Antonios G; Kohl T; Lehnart SE; Zoremba M; Sax U; Nussbeck SY
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 Sep; 283():59-68. PubMed ID: 34545820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Development of an open metadata schema for prospective clinical research (openPCR) in China.
Xu W; Guan Z; Sun J; Wang Z; Geng Y
Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):39-46. PubMed ID: 24317371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A data reusability assessment in the nanosafety domain based on the NSDRA framework followed by an exploratory quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR) modeling targeting cellular viability.
Furxhi I; Willighagen E; Evelo C; Costa A; Gardini D; Ammar A
NanoImpact; 2023 Jul; 31():100475. PubMed ID: 37423508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Metadata harmonization-Standards are the key for a better usage of omics data for integrative microbiome analysis.
Cernava T; Rybakova D; Buscot F; Clavel T; McHardy AC; Meyer F; Meyer F; Overmann J; Stecher B; Sessitsch A; Schloter M; Berg G;
Environ Microbiome; 2022 Jun; 17(1):33. PubMed ID: 35751093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The eNanoMapper database for nanomaterial safety information.
Jeliazkova N; Chomenidis C; Doganis P; Fadeel B; Grafström R; Hardy B; Hastings J; Hegi M; Jeliazkov V; Kochev N; Kohonen P; Munteanu CR; Sarimveis H; Smeets B; Sopasakis P; Tsiliki G; Vorgrimmler D; Willighagen E
Beilstein J Nanotechnol; 2015; 6():1609-34. PubMed ID: 26425413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metadata Concepts for Advancing the Use of Digital Health Technologies in Clinical Research.
Badawy R; Hameed F; Bataille L; Little MA; Claes K; Saria S; Cedarbaum JM; Stephenson D; Neville J; Maetzler W; Espay AJ; Bloem BR; Simuni T; Karlin DR
Digit Biomark; 2019; 3(3):116-132. PubMed ID: 32175520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Schema for Digitized Surface Swab Site Metadata in Open-Source DNA Sequence Databases.
Feng J; Daeschel D; Dooley D; Griffiths E; Allard M; Timme R; Chen Y; Snyder AB
mSystems; 2023 Apr; 8(2):e0128422. PubMed ID: 36847566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adamant: a JSON schema-based metadata editor for research data management workflows.
Chaerony Siffa I; Schäfer J; Becker MM
F1000Res; 2022; 11():475. PubMed ID: 35707001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adding Toxicological Context to Nanotoxicity Study Reporting Using the NanoTox Metadata List.
Drobne D
Small; 2021 Mar; 17(11):e2005622. PubMed ID: 33605049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving reusability along the data life cycle: a regulatory circuits case study.
Louarn M; Chatonnet F; Garnier X; Fest T; Siegel A; Faron C; Dameron O
J Biomed Semantics; 2022 Mar; 13(1):11. PubMed ID: 35346379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Machine actionable metadata models.
Batista D; Gonzalez-Beltran A; Sansone SA; Rocca-Serra P
Sci Data; 2022 Sep; 9(1):592. PubMed ID: 36180441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Guide for collecting and reporting metadata on protocol variables and parameters from slide-based histotechnology assays to enhance reproducibility.
Chiriboga L; Callis GM; Wang Y; Chlipala E
J Histotechnol; 2022 Dec; 45(4):132-147. PubMed ID: 36317862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
