192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34984485)
21. Comparing different algorithms for the course of Alzheimer's disease using machine learning.
Tang X; Liu J
Ann Palliat Med; 2021 Sep; 10(9):9715-9724. PubMed ID: 34628897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Machine learning approaches to predict peak demand days of cardiovascular admissions considering environmental exposure.
Qiu H; Luo L; Su Z; Zhou L; Wang L; Chen Y
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 May; 20(1):83. PubMed ID: 32357880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Machine learning for prediction of euploidy in human embryos: in search of the best-performing model and predictive features.
De Gheselle S; Jacques C; Chambost J; Blank C; Declerck K; De Croo I; Hickman C; Tilleman K
Fertil Steril; 2022 Apr; 117(4):738-746. PubMed ID: 35058042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Machine learning methods are comparable to logistic regression techniques in predicting severe walking limitation following total knee arthroplasty.
Pua YH; Kang H; Thumboo J; Clark RA; Chew ES; Poon CL; Chong HC; Yeo SJ
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2020 Oct; 28(10):3207-3216. PubMed ID: 31832697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. External validation and comparison of MR-based radiomics models for predicting pathological complete response in locally advanced rectal cancer: a two-centre, multi-vendor study.
Wei Q; Chen Z; Tang Y; Chen W; Zhong L; Mao L; Hu S; Wu Y; Deng K; Yang W; Liu X
Eur Radiol; 2023 Mar; 33(3):1906-1917. PubMed ID: 36355199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Predicting patient-reported outcomes following hip and knee replacement surgery using supervised machine learning.
Huber M; Kurz C; Leidl R
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2019 Jan; 19(1):3. PubMed ID: 30621670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predicting metastasis in gastric cancer patients: machine learning-based approaches.
Talebi A; Celis-Morales CA; Borumandnia N; Abbasi S; Pourhoseingholi MA; Akbari A; Yousefi J
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4163. PubMed ID: 36914697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Predicting Chronic Kidney Disease Using Hybrid Machine Learning Based on Apache Spark.
Abdel-Fattah MA; Othman NA; Goher N
Comput Intell Neurosci; 2022; 2022():9898831. PubMed ID: 35251161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Machine Learning and Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Patient Forecasting for a Patient-Specific Payment Model.
Navarro SM; Wang EY; Haeberle HS; Mont MA; Krebs VE; Patterson BM; Ramkumar PN
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Dec; 33(12):3617-3623. PubMed ID: 30243882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Machine Learning Models for Cardiovascular Disease Events Prediction.
Tsarapatsani K; Sakellarios AI; Pezoulas VC; Tsakanikas VD; Kleber ME; Marz W; Michalis LK; Fotiadis DI
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():1066-1069. PubMed ID: 36085658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Development and validation of comprehensive clinical outcome prediction models for acute ischaemic stroke in anterior circulation based on machine learning.
Zhang H; Chen H; Zhang C; Cao A; Yu Z; Wu H; Zhang J; Geng D
J Clin Neurosci; 2022 Oct; 104():1-9. PubMed ID: 35931000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The 30-days hospital readmission risk in diabetic patients: predictive modeling with machine learning classifiers.
Shang Y; Jiang K; Wang L; Zhang Z; Zhou S; Liu Y; Dong J; Wu H
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2021 Jul; 21(Suppl 2):57. PubMed ID: 34330267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of machine learning algorithms for the prediction of five-year survival in oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Alkhadar H; Macluskey M; White S; Ellis I; Gardner A
J Oral Pathol Med; 2021 Apr; 50(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 33220109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Chronic stress in practice assistants: An analytic approach comparing four machine learning classifiers with a standard logistic regression model.
Bozorgmehr A; Thielmann A; Weltermann B
PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0250842. PubMed ID: 33945572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Detecting Brain Tumor using Machines Learning Techniques Based on Different Features Extracting Strategies.
Hussain L; Saeed S; Awan IA; Idris A; Nadeem MSA; Chaudhry QU
Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2019; 15(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 32008569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Machine learning model-based risk prediction of severe complications after off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.
Zhang Y; Li L; Li Y; Zeng Z
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2023 Feb; 32(2):185-194. PubMed ID: 36226692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Algorithm After Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Applications to Length of Stay and Payment Models.
Ramkumar PN; Navarro SM; Haeberle HS; Karnuta JM; Mont MA; Iannotti JP; Patterson BM; Krebs VE
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Apr; 34(4):632-637. PubMed ID: 30665831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Developing a supervised machine learning model for predicting perioperative acute kidney injury in arthroplasty patients.
Nikkinen O; Kolehmainen T; Aaltonen T; Jämsä E; Alahuhta S; Vakkala M
Comput Biol Med; 2022 May; 144():105351. PubMed ID: 35286890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Machine learning vs. conventional methods for prediction of 30-day readmission following percutaneous mitral edge-to-edge repair.
Sulaiman S; Kawsara A; El Sabbagh A; Mahayni AA; Gulati R; Rihal CS; Alkhouli M
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2023 Nov; 56():18-24. PubMed ID: 37248108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Postoperative Morbidity and Discharge Destinations After Fast-Track Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Older Than 85 Years.
Pitter FT; Jørgensen CC; Lindberg-Larsen M; Kehlet H;
Anesth Analg; 2016 Jun; 122(6):1807-15. PubMed ID: 27195631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
