These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34984704)

  • 1. Food for thought: Commentary on Burnette et al. (2021) "Concerns and recommendations for using Amazon MTurk for eating disorder research".
    Moeck EK; Bridgland VME; Takarangi MKT
    Int J Eat Disord; 2022 Feb; 55(2):282-284. PubMed ID: 34984704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Eating disorder related research using Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk): Friend or foe?: Commentary on Burnette et al. (2021).
    Vogel M; Krüger J; Junne F
    Int J Eat Disord; 2022 Feb; 55(2):285-287. PubMed ID: 35014056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Practice makes perfect: Commentary on Burnette et al. (2021).
    De Young KP; Kambanis PE
    Int J Eat Disord; 2022 Feb; 55(2):273-275. PubMed ID: 34927269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Concerns and recommendations for using Amazon MTurk for eating disorder research.
    Burnette CB; Luzier JL; Bennett BL; Weisenmuller CM; Kerr P; Martin S; Keener J; Calderwood L
    Int J Eat Disord; 2022 Feb; 55(2):263-272. PubMed ID: 34562036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ethical concerns arising from recruiting workers from Amazon's Mechanical Turk as research participants: Commentary on Burnette et al. (2021).
    Gleibs IH; Albayrak-Aydemir N
    Int J Eat Disord; 2022 Feb; 55(2):276-277. PubMed ID: 34931338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The tension between ethics and rigor when using Amazon MTurk for eating disorder research: Response to commentaries on Burnette et al. (2021).
    Burnette CB; Luzier J; Bennett BL; Weisenmuller C; Kerr P; Keener J
    Int J Eat Disord; 2022 Feb; 55(2):288-289. PubMed ID: 35064602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eating disorder prevalence among Amazon MTurk workers assessed using a rigorous online, self-report anthropometric assessment.
    Kambanis PE; Bottera AR; De Young KP
    Eat Behav; 2021 Apr; 41():101481. PubMed ID: 33713921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mechanical Turk data collection in addiction research: utility, concerns and best practices.
    Mellis AM; Bickel WK
    Addiction; 2020 Oct; 115(10):1960-1968. PubMed ID: 32135574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparing the Recruitment of Research Participants With Chronic Low Back Pain Using Amazon Mechanical Turk With the Recruitment of Patients From Chiropractic Clinics: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
    Hilton LG; Coulter ID; Ryan GW; Hays RD
    J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2021 Oct; 44(8):601-611. PubMed ID: 35728997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using Crowdsourcing for Alcohol and Nicotine Use Research: Prevalence, Data Quality, and Attrition on Amazon Mechanical Turk.
    Rung JM; Almog S; Ferreiro AV; Berry MS
    Subst Use Misuse; 2022; 57(6):857-866. PubMed ID: 35258409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. New principles and new paths needed for online research in mental health: Commentary on Burnette et al. (2021).
    Donegan KR; Gillan CM
    Int J Eat Disord; 2022 Feb; 55(2):278-281. PubMed ID: 35005784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Crowdsourcing in Research Prioritization for Back Pain: Cross-Sectional Surveys.
    Bartek MA; Truitt AR; Widmer-Rodriguez S; Tuia J; Bauer ZA; Comstock BA; Edwards TC; Lawrence SO; Monsell SE; Patrick DL; Jarvik JG; Lavallee DC
    J Med Internet Res; 2017 Oct; 19(10):e341. PubMed ID: 28986339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tapped out or barely tapped? Recommendations for how to harness the vast and largely unused potential of the Mechanical Turk participant pool.
    Robinson J; Rosenzweig C; Moss AJ; Litman L
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(12):e0226394. PubMed ID: 31841534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Pictograph Recognition: A Comparison of Crowdsourcing and Traditional Survey Approaches.
    Kuang J; Argo L; Stoddard G; Bray BE; Zeng-Treitler Q
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Dec; 17(12):e281. PubMed ID: 26678085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Screening Amazon's Mechanical Turk for Adults With ADHD.
    Wymbs BT; Dawson AE
    J Atten Disord; 2019 Aug; 23(10):1178-1187. PubMed ID: 26246586
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reputation as a sufficient condition for data quality on Amazon Mechanical Turk.
    Peer E; Vosgerau J; Acquisti A
    Behav Res Methods; 2014 Dec; 46(4):1023-31. PubMed ID: 24356996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systems Perspective of Amazon Mechanical Turk for Organizational Research: Review and Recommendations.
    Keith MG; Tay L; Harms PD
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1359. PubMed ID: 28848474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.
    Chandler J; Shapiro D
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2016; 12():53-81. PubMed ID: 26772208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing Diabetes-Relevant Data Provided by Undergraduate and Crowdsourced Web-Based Survey Participants for Honesty and Accuracy.
    DePalma MT; Rizzotti MC; Branneman M
    JMIR Diabetes; 2017 Jul; 2(2):e11. PubMed ID: 30291072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk.
    Chandler J; Rosenzweig C; Moss AJ; Robinson J; Litman L
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Oct; 51(5):2022-2038. PubMed ID: 31512174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.