These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34984904)

  • 1. Additively Manufactured Lattice-like Subperiosteal Implants for Rehabilitation of the Severely Atrophic Ridge.
    Bai L; Zheng L; Ji P; Wan H; Zhou N; Liu R; Wang C
    ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2022 Feb; 8(2):912-920. PubMed ID: 34984904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A descriptive 18-year retrospective review of subperiosteal implants for patients with severely atrophied edentulous mandibles.
    Moore DJ; Hansen PA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Aug; 92(2):145-50. PubMed ID: 15295323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical evaluation of a patient-specific additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implant (AMSJI) using finite-element analysis.
    De Moor E; Huys SEF; van Lenthe GH; Mommaerts MY; Vander Sloten J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Mar; 51(3):405-411. PubMed ID: 34059405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partially Biodegradable Distraction Implant to Replace Conventional Implants in Alveolar Bone of Insufficient Height: A Preliminary Study in Dogs.
    Li T; Zhang Y; Shao B; Gao Y; Zhang C; Cao Q; Kong L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Dec; 17(6):1164-73. PubMed ID: 24888978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Additively custom-made 3D-printed subperiosteal implants for the rehabilitation of the severely atrophic maxilla (a case report).
    Arshad M; Khoramshahi N; Shirani G
    Clin Case Rep; 2023 Nov; 11(11):e8135. PubMed ID: 37942187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone loading pattern around implants in average and atrophic edentulous maxillae: a finite-element analysis.
    Meyer U; Vollmer D; Runte C; Bourauel C; Joos U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2001 Apr; 29(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 11465432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Custom-made additively manufactured subperiosteal implant.
    Strappa EM; Memè L; Cerea M; Roy M; Bambini F
    Minerva Dent Oral Sci; 2022 Dec; 71(6):353-360. PubMed ID: 36345834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peri-implant bone changes following tooth extraction, immediate placement and loading of implants in the edentulous maxilla.
    Barbier L; Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Aug; 16(4):1061-70. PubMed ID: 21932023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Immediate function of cortically anchored disk-design implants without bone augmentation in moderately to severely resorbed completely edentulous maxillae.
    Scortecci G
    J Oral Implantol; 1999; 25(2):70-9. PubMed ID: 10551141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Problems associated with the atrophic mandible.
    Worthington P; Rubenstein JE
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Jan; 42(1):129-60. PubMed ID: 9421674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of guided bone regeneration around commercially pure titanium and hydroxyapatite-coated dental implants. II. Histologic analysis.
    Stentz WC; Mealey BL; Gunsolley JC; Waldrop TC
    J Periodontol; 1997 Oct; 68(10):933-49. PubMed ID: 9358360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term peri-implant bone level changes of non-vascularized fibula bone grafted edentulous patients.
    Duttenhoefer F; Nack C; Doll C; Raguse JD; Hell B; Stricker A; Nelson K; Nahles S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 25863644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of the rigidity of a provisional restoration supported on four immediately loaded implants in the edentulous maxilla on biomechanical bone-implant interactions under simulated bruxism conditions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yamaguchi K; Ishiura Y; Tanaka S; Baba K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25191887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluating the biomechanical effects of implant diameter in case of facial trauma to an edentulous atrophic mandible: a 3D finite element analysis.
    Ayali A; Bilginaylar K
    Head Face Med; 2017 May; 13(1):5. PubMed ID: 28464946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Full-arch rehabilitation of severely atrophic maxilla with additively manufactured custom-made subperiosteal implants: A multicenter retrospective study.
    Vaira LA; Biglio A; Roy M; Salzano G; Troise S; Abbate V; Mayo-Yanez M; Lechien JR; Piombino P; De Riu G
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38871617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ramus hinges for excessive movements of the condyles: a new dimension in mandibular tripodal subperiosteal implants.
    Linkow LI; Ghalili R
    J Oral Implantol; 1999; 25(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 10483422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Custom-made Subperiosteal Implants: A Finite Element Analysis on Monoblock and Dual Implant Systems in Atrophic Maxilla.
    Ayhan M; Cankaya AB
    Int J Med Sci; 2023; 20(13):1755-1762. PubMed ID: 37928878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bone loss around immediately loaded transitional implants: histologic and microcomputed tomographic analysis--a case report.
    Grassi R; Rebaudi A; Trisi P; Covani U; Barone A
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2012 Dec; 32(6):e195-203. PubMed ID: 23057063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Implant rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla including immediate fixed provisional restoration without the use of bone grafting: a review of 1-year outcome data from a long-term prospective clinical trial.
    Toljanic JA; Baer RA; Ekstrand K; Thor A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):518-26. PubMed ID: 19587876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years.
    Aparicio C; Ouazzani W; Garcia R; Arevalo X; Muela R; Fortes V
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2006; 8(3):114-22. PubMed ID: 16919019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.