121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34985379)
1. The Manchester operation - is it time for it to return to our surgical armamentarium in the twenty-first century?
Gold RS; Amir H; Baruch Y; Gordon D; Shimonov M; Groutz A
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Jul; 42(5):1419-1423. PubMed ID: 34985379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Manchester Operation: An Effective Treatment for Uterine Prolapse Caused by True Cervical Elongation.
Park YJ; Kong MK; Lee J; Kim EH; Bai SW
Yonsei Med J; 2019 Nov; 60(11):1074-1080. PubMed ID: 31637890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Method of Surgical Management of Genital Prolapse with Cervical Elongation].
Ishchenko AI; Aleksandrov LS; Ishchenko AA; Hudoley EP
Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 2016; 71(6):413-9. PubMed ID: 29298001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uterus preserving vaginal surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy for correction of female pelvic organ prolapse.
Iliev VN; Andonova IT
Pril (Makedon Akad Nauk Umet Odd Med Nauki); 2014; 35(1):243-7. PubMed ID: 24802202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Vaginal and laparoscopic mesh hysteropexy for uterovaginal prolapse: a parallel cohort study.
Gutman RE; Rardin CR; Sokol ER; Matthews C; Park AJ; Iglesia CB; Geoffrion R; Sokol AI; Karram M; Cundiff GW; Blomquist JL; Barber MD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):38.e1-38.e11. PubMed ID: 27596620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Manchester repair: an instructional video.
Walsh CE; Ow LL; Rajamaheswari N; Dwyer PL
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Sep; 28(9):1425-1427. PubMed ID: 28213796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Women's well-being after Manchester procedure for pelvic reconstruction with uterine preservation: a follow-up study.
Liebergall-Wischnitzer M; Ben-Meir A; Sarid O; Cwikel J; Lavy Y
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1587-92. PubMed ID: 22210295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Manchester operation for uterine prolapse.
Ayhan A; Esin S; Guven S; Salman C; Ozyuncu O
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Mar; 92(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 16427641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A blind spot: Manchester Fothergill operation for cervical elongation without uterine descensus.
Doganay M; Tugrul D; Ersak B; Kuntay Kokanalı M; Cavkaytar S; Seyfi Aksakal O
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2022 Apr; 271():83-87. PubMed ID: 35151961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Manchester procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine prolapse: a review.
Tolstrup CK; Lose G; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 27485234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The manchester-fothergill procedure as a fertility sparing alternative for pelvic organ prolapse in young women.
Skiadas CC; Goldstein DP; Laufer MR
J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol; 2006 Apr; 19(2):89-93. PubMed ID: 16624695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of two vaginal, uterus sparing operations for pelvic organ prolapse: modified Manchester operation (MM) and sacrospinous hysteropexy (SSH), a study protocol for a multicentre randomized non-inferiority trial (the SAM study).
Schulten SFM; Enklaar RA; Kluivers KB; van Leijsen SAL; Jansen-van der Weide MC; Adang EMM; van Bavel J; van Dongen H; Gerritse MBE; van Gestel I; Malmberg GGA; Mouw RJC; van Rumpt-van de Geest DA; Spaans WA; van der Steen A; Stekelenburg J; Tiersma ESM; Verkleij-Hagoort AC; Vollebregt A; Wingen CBM; Weemhoff M; van Eijndhoven HWF
BMC Womens Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):49. PubMed ID: 30940171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical interventions for uterine prolapse and for vault prolapse: the two VUE RCTs.
Hemming C; Constable L; Goulao B; Kilonzo M; Boyers D; Elders A; Cooper K; Smith A; Freeman R; Breeman S; McDonald A; Hagen S; Montgomery I; Norrie J; Glazener C
Health Technol Assess; 2020 Mar; 24(13):1-220. PubMed ID: 32138809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Great elongation of uterine cervix: retrospective study of 20 cases].
Deval B; Heitz D; Daraï E; Paniel B; Truc JB; Levardon M; Poitout P
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2002 Jun; 31(4):343-51. PubMed ID: 12058138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Uterus preserving surgery versus vaginal hysterectomy in treatment of uterine descent: a systematic review].
Detollenaere RJ; den Boon J; Vierhout ME; van Eijndhoven HW
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(42):A3623. PubMed ID: 22027462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical cancer after the Manchester procedure: a nationwide cohort study.
Husby KR; Gradel KO; Klarskov N
Int Urogynecol J; 2023 Aug; 34(8):1837-1842. PubMed ID: 36763147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A case of neovagina surgical creation using the uterine cervix remnant in a patient with Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome.
Medvediev M; Spesyvtsev D; Pokrovenko D
Fertil Steril; 2021 Nov; 116(5):1420-1422. PubMed ID: 34330430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Manchester procedure combined with laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy by retroperitoneal tunneling.
Seçkin KD; Kadiroğulları P; Kıyak H; Doğan AR; Tapısız ÖL
J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2022 Sep; 23(3):219-221. PubMed ID: 34109740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingoplasty operation.
Neuman M; Lavy Y
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Aug; 18(8):889-93. PubMed ID: 17136484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical elongation following sacrospinous hysteropexy: a case series.
Hyakutake MT; Cundiff GW; Geoffrion R
Int Urogynecol J; 2014 Jun; 25(6):851-4. PubMed ID: 24297063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
