144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34985443)
1. Foam-like phantoms for comparing tomography algorithms.
Pelt DM; Hendriksen AA; Batenburg KJ
J Synchrotron Radiat; 2022 Jan; 29(Pt 1):254-265. PubMed ID: 34985443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Method of generating multiple sets of experimental phantom data.
Sitek A; Reutter BW; Huesman RH; Gullberg GT
J Nucl Med; 2006 Jul; 47(7):1187-92. PubMed ID: 16818954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Generation of a suite of 3D computer-generated breast phantoms from a limited set of human subject data.
Hsu CM; Palmeri ML; Segars WP; Veress AI; Dobbins JT
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):043703. PubMed ID: 23556929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analytical versus voxelized phantom representation for Monte Carlo simulation in radiological imaging.
Peter J; Tornai MP; Jaszczek RJ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 May; 19(5):556-64. PubMed ID: 11021699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DEBISim: A simulation pipeline for dual energy CT-based baggage inspection systems1.
Manerikar A; Li F; Kak AC
J Xray Sci Technol; 2021; 29(2):259-285. PubMed ID: 33646192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of planned dose reporting methods on Gamma pass rates for IROC lung and liver motion phantoms treated with pencil beam scanning protons.
Kang Y; Shen J; Liu W; Taylor PA; Mehrens HS; Ding X; Hu Y; Tryggestad E; Keole SR; Schild SE; Wong WW; Fatyga M; Bues M
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jun; 14(1):108. PubMed ID: 31208439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3-D Stochastic Numerical Breast Phantoms for Enabling Virtual Imaging Trials of Ultrasound Computed Tomography.
Li F; Villa U; Park S; Anastasio MA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2022 Jan; 69(1):135-146. PubMed ID: 34520354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modularized data-driven reconstruction framework for nonideal focal spot effect elimination in computed tomography.
Zhang Z; Yu L; Zhao W; Xing L
Med Phys; 2021 May; 48(5):2245-2257. PubMed ID: 33595900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Advances in digital and physical anthropomorphic breast phantoms for x-ray imaging.
Glick SJ; Ikejimba LC
Med Phys; 2018 Oct; 45(10):e870-e885. PubMed ID: 30058117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Multicenter CT phantoms public dataset for radiomics reproducibility tests.
Kalendralis P; Traverso A; Shi Z; Zhovannik I; Monshouwer R; Starmans MPA; Klein S; Pfaehler E; Boellaard R; Dekker A; Wee L
Med Phys; 2019 Mar; 46(3):1512-1518. PubMed ID: 30629299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a deformable lung phantom with 3D-printed flexible airways.
Shin DS; Kang SH; Kim KH; Kim TH; Kim DS; Chung JB; Lucero SA; Suh TS; Yamamoto T
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):898-908. PubMed ID: 31863479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantum noise properties of CT images with anatomical textured backgrounds across reconstruction algorithms: FBP and SAFIRE.
Solomon J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2014 Sep; 41(9):091908. PubMed ID: 25186395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A novel simulation-driven reconstruction approach for x-ray computed tomography.
Hsieh J
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2245-2258. PubMed ID: 35102555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The UF series of tomographic computational phantoms of pediatric patients.
Lee C; Williams JL; Lee C; Bolch WE
Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3537-48. PubMed ID: 16475752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Realistic CT simulation using the 4D XCAT phantom.
Segars WP; Mahesh M; Beck TJ; Frey EC; Tsui BM
Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3800-8. PubMed ID: 18777939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. XAP-Lab: A software tool for designing flexible X-ray acquisition protocols.
Martínez A; García-Santos A; Ballesteros N; Desco M; Abella M
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2019 Aug; 177():243-252. PubMed ID: 31319953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Multimodal Breast Phantoms for Microwave, Ultrasound, Mammography, Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography Imaging.
Ruvio G; Solimene R; Cuccaro A; Fiaschetti G; Fagan AJ; Cournane S; Cooke J; Ammann MJ; Tobon J; Browne JE
Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32340281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Population of anatomically variable 4D XCAT adult phantoms for imaging research and optimization.
Segars WP; Bond J; Frush J; Hon S; Eckersley C; Williams CH; Feng J; Tward DJ; Ratnanather JT; Miller MI; Frush D; Samei E
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):043701. PubMed ID: 23556927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Four-dimensional tissue deformation reconstruction (4D TDR) validation using a real tissue phantom.
Szegedi M; Hinkle J; Rassiah P; Sarkar V; Wang B; Joshi S; Salter B
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 14(1):4012. PubMed ID: 23318387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Simulation of x-ray-induced acoustic imaging for absolute dosimetry: Accuracy of image reconstruction methods.
Forghani F; Mahl A; Patton TJ; Jones BL; Borden MA; Westerly DC; Altunbas C; Miften M; Thomas DH
Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1280-1290. PubMed ID: 31828781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
