235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34986311)
21. Optimization of Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry for Deep and Highly Sensitive Proteomic Analysis.
Kawashima Y; Watanabe E; Umeyama T; Nakajima D; Hattori M; Honda K; Ohara O
Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Nov; 20(23):. PubMed ID: 31779068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Quantitative shotgun proteome analysis by direct infusion.
Meyer JG; Niemi NM; Pagliarini DJ; Coon JJ
Nat Methods; 2020 Dec; 17(12):1222-1228. PubMed ID: 33230323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Experimental Null Method to Guide the Development of Technical Procedures and to Control False-Positive Discovery in Quantitative Proteomics.
Shen X; Hu Q; Li J; Wang J; Qu J
J Proteome Res; 2015 Oct; 14(10):4147-57. PubMed ID: 26051676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Chemoproteomic profiling of targets of lipid-derived electrophiles by bioorthogonal aminooxy probe.
Chen Y; Cong Y; Quan B; Lan T; Chu X; Ye Z; Hou X; Wang C
Redox Biol; 2017 Aug; 12():712-718. PubMed ID: 28411555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Label-free quantification in ion mobility-enhanced data-independent acquisition proteomics.
Distler U; Kuharev J; Navarro P; Tenzer S
Nat Protoc; 2016 Apr; 11(4):795-812. PubMed ID: 27010757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Characterization of Cerebrospinal Fluid via Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry.
Barkovits K; Linden A; Galozzi S; Schilde L; Pacharra S; Mollenhauer B; Stoepel N; Steinbach S; May C; Uszkoreit J; Eisenacher M; Marcus K
J Proteome Res; 2018 Oct; 17(10):3418-3430. PubMed ID: 30207155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. DIA-NN: neural networks and interference correction enable deep proteome coverage in high throughput.
Demichev V; Messner CB; Vernardis SI; Lilley KS; Ralser M
Nat Methods; 2020 Jan; 17(1):41-44. PubMed ID: 31768060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Extensive and Accurate Benchmarking of DIA Acquisition Methods and Software Tools Using a Complex Proteomic Standard.
Gotti C; Roux-Dalvai F; Joly-Beauparlant C; Mangnier L; Leclercq M; Droit A
J Proteome Res; 2021 Oct; 20(10):4801-4814. PubMed ID: 34472865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mass defect-based carbonyl activated tags (mdCATs) for multiplex data-independent acquisition proteome quantification.
Zhang S; Di Y; Yao J; Wang Y; Shu H; Yan G; Zhang L; Lu H
Chem Commun (Camb); 2021 Jan; 57(6):737-740. PubMed ID: 33496701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Tandem orthogonal proteolysis-activity-based protein profiling (TOP-ABPP)--a general method for mapping sites of probe modification in proteomes.
Weerapana E; Speers AE; Cravatt BF
Nat Protoc; 2007; 2(6):1414-25. PubMed ID: 17545978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. High-Throughput Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics with dia-PASEF.
Skowronek P; Meier F
Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2456():15-27. PubMed ID: 35612732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Improving Phosphoproteomics Profiling Using Data-Independent Mass Spectrometry.
Srinivasan A; Sing JC; Gingras AC; Röst HL
J Proteome Res; 2022 Aug; 21(8):1789-1799. PubMed ID: 35877786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomedical applications of ion mobility-enhanced data-independent acquisition-based label-free quantitative proteomics.
Distler U; Kuharev J; Tenzer S
Expert Rev Proteomics; 2014 Dec; 11(6):675-84. PubMed ID: 25327648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. DIGE-ABPP by click chemistry: pairwise comparison of serine hydrolase activities from the apoplast of infected plants.
Hong TN; van der Hoorn RA
Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1127():183-94. PubMed ID: 24643562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multiplexed and data-independent tandem mass spectrometry for global proteome profiling.
Chapman JD; Goodlett DR; Masselon CD
Mass Spectrom Rev; 2014; 33(6):452-70. PubMed ID: 24281846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. CIMAGE2.0: An Expanded Tool for Quantitative Analysis of Activity-Based Protein Profiling (ABPP) Data.
Gao J; Liu Y; Yang F; Chen X; Cravatt BF; Wang C
J Proteome Res; 2021 Oct; 20(10):4893-4900. PubMed ID: 34495668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Removing the Hidden Data Dependency of DIA with Predicted Spectral Libraries.
Van Puyvelde B; Willems S; Gabriels R; Daled S; De Clerck L; Vande Casteele S; Staes A; Impens F; Deforce D; Martens L; Degroeve S; Dhaenens M
Proteomics; 2020 Feb; 20(3-4):e1900306. PubMed ID: 31981311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. MdFDIA: A Mass Defect Based Four-Plex Data-Independent Acquisition Strategy for Proteome Quantification.
Di Y; Zhang Y; Zhang L; Tao T; Lu H
Anal Chem; 2017 Oct; 89(19):10248-10255. PubMed ID: 28872844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Proteome-Wide Profiling of Targets of Cysteine reactive Small Molecules by Using Ethynyl Benziodoxolone Reagents.
Abegg D; Frei R; Cerato L; Prasad Hari D; Wang C; Waser J; Adibekian A
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2015 Sep; 54(37):10852-7. PubMed ID: 26211368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Drug Target Identification Using an iTRAQ-Based Quantitative Chemical Proteomics Approach-Based on a Target Profiling Study of Andrographolide.
Wang J; Wong YK; Zhang J; Lee YM; Hua ZC; Shen HM; Lin Q
Methods Enzymol; 2017; 586():291-309. PubMed ID: 28137568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
