BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34986672)

  • 1. Data from small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: FIGO 2018 staging is more accurate than FIGO 2009.
    Zhang Y; Ding J; Hua K
    J Int Med Res; 2022 Jan; 50(1):3000605211067397. PubMed ID: 34986672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic factors in FIGO stage IB-IIA small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated surgically: results of a multi-center retrospective Korean study.
    Lee JM; Lee KB; Nam JH; Ryu SY; Bae DS; Park JT; Kim SC; Cha SD; Kim KR; Song SY; Kang SB
    Ann Oncol; 2008 Feb; 19(2):321-6. PubMed ID: 17962205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Clinical analysis of 32 cases with neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix in early-stage disease].
    Wang Z; Wu L; Yao H; Sun Y; Li X; Li B; Zhang R; Ma S; Huang M
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):198-203. PubMed ID: 26268410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A multicenter study of the importance of systemic chemotherapy for patients with small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Lee SW; Lim KT; Bae DS; Park SY; Kim YT; Kim KR; Nam JH
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2015; 79(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 25500455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prognostic factors and treatment comparison in small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the uterine cervix based on population analyses.
    Lin LM; Lin Q; Liu J; Chu KX; Huang YX; Zhang ZK; Li T; Dai YQ; Li JL
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(18):6524-6532. PubMed ID: 32705800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Neuroendocrine carcinoma of cervix: a clinicopathologic study of 82 cases].
    Feng M; Zou J; Zhang Y; Sun L
    Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2018 May; 47(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 29783797
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinicopathological Aspects of Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: a Multicenter Retrospective Study and Meta-Analysis.
    Xu F; Ma J; Yi H; Hu H; Fan L; Wu P; Chen X; Wu X; Yu L; Xing H; Wang W
    Cell Physiol Biochem; 2018; 50(3):1113-1122. PubMed ID: 30355937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinicopathological risk factors in the light of the revised 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for early cervical cancer with staging IB: A single center retrospective study.
    Zeng J; Qu P; Hu Y; Sun P; Qi J; Zhao G; Gao Y
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Apr; 99(16):e19714. PubMed ID: 32311956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cycles of cisplatin and etoposide affect treatment outcomes in patients with FIGO stage I-II small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix.
    Pei X; Xiang L; Ye S; He T; Cheng Y; Yang W; Wu X; Yang H
    Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Dec; 147(3):589-596. PubMed ID: 28954697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of neo/adjuvant treatment choices on prognosis for surgically treated small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix.
    Zhao D; Sun S; Yang Z; Wang P; Qiu H
    Neoplasma; 2024 Feb; 71(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 38215035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical Features of Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review.
    Nagao S; Miwa M; Maeda N; Kogiku A; Yamamoto K; Morimoto A; Wakahashi S; Ichida K; Sudo T; Yamaguchi S; Sakuma T; Fujiwara K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Sep; 25(7):1300-5. PubMed ID: 26166556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Magnetic resonance imaging-based validation of the 2018 FIGO staging system in patients treated with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced cervix cancer.
    Kim J; Cho Y; Kim N; Chung SY; Kim JW; Lee IJ; Kim YB
    Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 160(3):735-741. PubMed ID: 33358037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a multi-institutional experience.
    Li J; Ouyang Y; Tao Y; Wang L; Li M; Gao L; Cao X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Feb; 30(2):174-180. PubMed ID: 31792086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prognostic Factors of Surgically Treated Early-Stage Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Cervix.
    Yuan L; Jiang H; Lu Y; Guo SW; Liu X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Sep; 25(7):1315-21. PubMed ID: 26186071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prognostic factors and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the uterine cervix based on the FIGO 2018 staging system: a single-institution study of 172 patients.
    Chen J; Sun Y; Chen L; Zang L; Lin C; Lu Y; Lin L; Lin A; Dan H; Chen Y; He H
    PeerJ; 2021; 9():e11563. PubMed ID: 34268005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FIGO Classification 2018: Validation Study in Patients With Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Treated With Chemoradiation.
    Raut A; Chopra S; Mittal P; Patil G; Mahantshetty U; Gurram L; Swamidas J; Ghosh J; Gulia S; Popat P; Deodhar K; Maheshwari A; Gupta S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Dec; 108(5):1248-1256. PubMed ID: 32681859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The tumor-stroma ratio is an independent predictor of survival in patients with 2018 FIGO stage IIIC squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix following primary radical surgery.
    Zong L; Zhang Q; Kong Y; Yang F; Zhou Y; Yu S; Wu M; Chen J; Zhang Y; Xiang Y
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):676-681. PubMed ID: 31882242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prognostic Performance of the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Cervical Cancer Staging Guidelines.
    Wright JD; Matsuo K; Huang Y; Tergas AI; Hou JY; Khoury-Collado F; St Clair CM; Ananth CV; Neugut AI; Hershman DL
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jul; 134(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 31188324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A multi-center retrospective study of neuroendocrine tumors of the uterine cervix: Prognosis according to the new 2018 staging system, comparing outcomes for different chemotherapeutic regimens and histopathological subtypes.
    Ishikawa M; Kasamatsu T; Tsuda H; Fukunaga M; Sakamoto A; Kaku T; Kato T; Takahashi K; Ariyoshi K; Suzuki K; Arimoto T; Matsumoto Y; Nakai H; Inoue T; Yokoyama M; Kawabata T; Kodama S; Miyamoto T; Takano M; Yaegashi N
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Dec; 155(3):444-451. PubMed ID: 31635755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The local treatment modalities in FIGO stage I-II small-cell carcinoma of the cervix are determined by disease stage and lymph node status.
    Zhou J; Yang HY; Wu SG; He ZY; Lin HX; Sun JY; Li Q; Guo ZW
    Cancer Med; 2016 Jun; 5(6):1108-15. PubMed ID: 26990881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.