These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34986703)

  • 1. The Effect of Extralegal Factors in Decision-Making About Juvenile Offenders in Chile: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
    Carvacho P; Droppelmann C; Mateo M
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2023 Mar; 67(4):398-419. PubMed ID: 34986703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mental health in juvenile judges' decision-making: review of literature.
    Cappon L; Vander Laenen F
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2013; 36(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 23218170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judicial appraisals of risk assessment in sentencing.
    Monahan J; Metz AL; Garrett BL
    Behav Sci Law; 2018 Sep; 36(5):565-575. PubMed ID: 30306621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Brief Report: Judicial Attitudes Regarding the Sentencing of Offenders with High Functioning Autism.
    Berryessa CM
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2016 Aug; 46(8):2770-2773. PubMed ID: 27106568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judicial Decision-Making and Juvenile Offenders: Effects of Medical Evidence and Victim Age.
    Falligant JM; Fix RL; Alexander AA
    J Child Sex Abus; 2017; 26(4):388-406. PubMed ID: 28441096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rational Choice Theory Applied to an Explanation of Juvenile Offender Decision Making in the Chinese Setting.
    Zhao J; Wang X; Zhang H; Zhao R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2021 Mar; 65(4):434-457. PubMed ID: 32508241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Defendant mental illness and juror decision-making: A comparison of sample types.
    Mossière A; Maeder EM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():58-66. PubMed ID: 26314888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Political orientation and perceptions of adolescent autonomy and judicial culpability.
    Reppucci ND; Scott E; Antonishak J
    Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 19156676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judicial breakfast as an external factor in judicial decision making in courts.
    Tampubolon M; Situmeang T; Saragih P
    F1000Res; 2023; 12():9. PubMed ID: 36911239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judicial sentencing considerations in cases of violent offenders versus sexual offenders.
    Butrus N
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(5):653-674. PubMed ID: 31984044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Juvenile offenders assessment.
    Folino JO; Mayer EL
    Curr Opin Psychiatry; 2011 Sep; 24(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 21788899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Differences between juvenile offenders with and without intellectual disabilities in the importance of static and dynamic risk factors for recidivism.
    van der Put CE; Asscher JJ; Stams GJ; Moonen XM
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2014 Nov; 58(11):992-1003. PubMed ID: 23919502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Decision-Making in Offender Populations with Mental Disorder.
    Jones KA; Hewson T; Sales CP; Khalifa N
    Neuropsychol Rev; 2019 Jun; 29(2):244-258. PubMed ID: 30798419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Culturally competent practice with African American juvenile sex offenders.
    Venable VM; Guada J
    J Child Sex Abus; 2014; 23(3):229-46. PubMed ID: 24641684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving professional judgments of risk and amenability in juvenile justice.
    Mulvey EP; Iselin AM
    Future Child; 2008; 18(2):35-57. PubMed ID: 21337997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender differences in the trends and correlates of major depressive episodes among juvenile offenders in the United States.
    Holzer KJ; Oh S; Salas-Wright CP; Vaughn MG; Landess J
    Compr Psychiatry; 2018 Jan; 80():72-80. PubMed ID: 29065310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying Risk and Protective Factors in Recidivist Juvenile Offenders: A Decision Tree Approach.
    Ortega-Campos E; García-García J; Gil-Fenoy MJ; Zaldívar-Basurto F
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(9):e0160423. PubMed ID: 27611313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Enhancing the effectiveness of juvenile drug courts by integrating evidence-based practices.
    Henggeler SW; McCart MR; Cunningham PB; Chapman JE
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2012 Apr; 80(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 22309470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gendered Justice in China: Victim-Offender Mediation as the "Different Voice" of Female Judges.
    Wei S
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2021 Mar; 65(4):346-372. PubMed ID: 32613872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Playing dice with criminal sentences: the influence of irrelevant anchors on experts' judicial decision making.
    Englich B; Mussweiler T; Strack F
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Feb; 32(2):188-200. PubMed ID: 16382081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.