BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34988002)

  • 1. Influence of receiver bandwidth on MRI artifacts caused by orthodontic brackets composed of different alloys.
    Abdala-Junior R; No-Cortes J; Arita ES; Ackerman JL; da Silva RLB; Kim JH; Cortes ARG
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Dec; 51(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 34988002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of pulse sequence parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on MRI artefacts produced by metal-ceramic restorations.
    Cortes AR; Abdala-Junior R; Weber M; Arita ES; Ackerman JL
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150136. PubMed ID: 26084475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging.
    Wylezinska M; Pinkstone M; Hay N; Scott AD; Birch MJ; Miquel ME
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):610-7. PubMed ID: 25667040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Induced magnetic moment in stainless steel components of orthodontic appliances in 1.5 T MRI scanners.
    Wang ZJ; Rollins NK; Liang H; Park YJ
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5871-8. PubMed ID: 26429261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments.
    Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional ultrashort echo magnetic resonance imaging of orthodontic appliances in the natural dentition.
    Cox RJ; Kau CH; Rasche V
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):552-61. PubMed ID: 22999679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of friction of conventional and metal-insert ceramic brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):403-9. PubMed ID: 14560270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Aneurysm clip MR artifacts. Titanium versus stainless steel and influence of imaging parameters.
    Burtscher IM; Owman T; Romner B; Ståhlberg F; Holtås S
    Acta Radiol; 1998 Jan; 39(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 9498874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. A systematic review.
    Archambault A; Lacoursiere R; Badawi H; Major PW; Carey J; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2010 Jan; 80(1):201-10. PubMed ID: 19852662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the frictional characteristics of aesthetic orthodontic brackets measured using a modified in vitro technique.
    Arici N; Akdeniz BS; Arici S
    Korean J Orthod; 2015 Jan; 45(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 25667915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners.
    Sonesson M; Al-Qabandi F; Månsson S; Abdulraheem S; Bondemark L; Hellén-Halme K
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Mar; 51(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 33828963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MRI compatibility of orthodontic brackets and wires: systematic review article.
    Dobai A; Dembrovszky F; Vízkelety T; Barsi P; Juhász F; Dobó-Nagy C
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jul; 22(1):298. PubMed ID: 35854295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of orthodontic brackets and permanent retainers on the diagnostic image quality of MRI scans: A preliminary study.
    Neela PK; Tatikonda VK; Syed MW; Mamillapalli PK; Sesham VM; Keesara S
    Dent Med Probl; 2021; 58(4):499-508. PubMed ID: 34905303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro evaluation of frictional forces between archwires and ceramic brackets.
    Nishio C; da Motta AF; Elias CN; Mucha JN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Jan; 125(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 14718880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of friction during sliding tooth movement in various bracket-arch wire combinations.
    Loftus BP; Artun J; Nicholls JI; Alonzo TA; Stoner JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Sep; 116(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 10474108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of Different Bracket's Resistance to Torsional Forces from Archwire.
    Khanapure CC; Ayesha S; Sam G; Kumar VJ; Deepika C; Ahmed H
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Jul; 17(7):564-7. PubMed ID: 27595723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and archwire: an in vitro study.
    Husain N; Kumar A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):91-9. PubMed ID: 22186750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dimensional accuracy of ceramic self-ligating brackets and estimates of theoretical torsional play.
    Lee Y; Lee DY; Kim YJ
    Angle Orthod; 2016 Sep; 86(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 26756375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Ricciardi A; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 14560269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments].
    Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
    Orthod Fr; 2017 Jun; 88(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 28597834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.