184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34988004)
1. Assessment of the accuracy of laser-scanned models and 3-dimensional rendered cone-beam computed tomographic images compared to digital caliper measurements on plaster casts.
Yousefi F; Shokri A; Zahedi F; Farhadian M
Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Dec; 51(4):429-438. PubMed ID: 34988004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of laser-scanned models compared to plaster models and cone-beam computed tomography.
Kim J; Heo G; Lagravère MO
Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 23957664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of Bolton analysis measured in laser scanned digital models compared with plaster models (gold standard) and cone-beam computer tomography images.
Kim J; Lagravére MO
Korean J Orthod; 2016 Jan; 46(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 26877978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mesiodistal Measurements for Dental Implant Planning: A Prospective Clinical Study of Linear Measurements on Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Images in Comparison with Caliper-Based Measurements on Plaster Casts.
Vazquez L; Buser R; Carrel JP
Dent J (Basel); 2022 Sep; 10(9):. PubMed ID: 36135164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Accuracy and reproducibility of permanent dentitions and dental arch measurements: comparing three different digital models with a plaster study cast.
Al-Mashraqi AA; Alhammadi MS; Gadi AA; Altharawi RA; Zamim KAH; Halboub E
Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Dec; 24(4):353-362. PubMed ID: 34931771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dental measurements and Bolton index reliability and accuracy obtained from 2D digital, 3D segmented CBCT, and 3d intraoral laser scanner.
San José V; Bellot-Arcís C; Tarazona B; Zamora N; O Lagravère M; Paredes-Gallardo V
J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Dec; 9(12):e1466-e1473. PubMed ID: 29410764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of digital dental models using the low-cost DAVID laser scanner.
Olszewski R; Szyper-Szczurowska J; Opach M; Bednarczyk P; Zapala J; Szczepanik S
Adv Clin Exp Med; 2019 Dec; 28(12):1647-1656. PubMed ID: 31778603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy and reliability of a novel method for fusion of digital dental casts and Cone Beam Computed Tomography scans.
Rangel FA; Maal TJ; Bronkhorst EM; Breuning KH; Schols JG; Bergé SJ; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e59130. PubMed ID: 23527111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Exploring a new method for superimposition of pre-treatment and post-treatment mandibular digital dental casts in adults].
Dai FF; Liu Y; Xu TM; Chen G
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2018 Apr; 50(2):271-278. PubMed ID: 29643526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional comparison of 2 digital models obtained from cone-beam computed tomographic scans of polyvinyl siloxane impressions and plaster models.
Park JY; Kim D; Han SS; Yu HS; Cha JY
Imaging Sci Dent; 2019 Dec; 49(4):257-263. PubMed ID: 31915610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measurements using orthodontic analysis software on digital models obtained by 3D scans of plaster casts : Intrarater reliability and validity.
Czarnota J; Hey J; Fuhrmann R
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Jan; 77(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 26753549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of orthodontic measurements on dental plaster casts and 3D scans.
Radeke J; von der Wense C; Lapatki BG
J Orofac Orthop; 2014 Jul; 75(4):264-74. PubMed ID: 24996855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Accuracy and Reproducibility of Linear Measurements Made on CBCT-derived Digital Models.
Maroua AL; Ajaj M; Hajeer MY
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Apr; 17(4):294-9. PubMed ID: 27340163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Registration accuracy in the integration of laser-scanned dental images into maxillofacial cone-beam computed tomography images.
Noh H; Nabha W; Cho JH; Hwang HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):585-91. PubMed ID: 21967948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Suitability and accuracy of CBCT model scan: an in vitro study.
Robben J; Muallah J; Wesemann C; Nowak R; Mah J; Pospiech P; Bumann A
Int J Comput Dent; 2017; 20(4):363-375. PubMed ID: 29292411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing agreement in measurements of orthodontic study models: Digital caliper on plaster models vs 3-dimensional software on models scanned by structured-light scanner.
Wan Hassan WN; Othman SA; Chan CS; Ahmad R; Ali SN; Abd Rohim A
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):886-895. PubMed ID: 27871715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the dimensional and morphological accuracy of three-dimensional digital dental casts digitized using different methods.
Ye J; Wang S; Wang Z; Liu Y; Sun Y; Ye H; Zhou Y
Odontology; 2023 Jan; 111(1):165-171. PubMed ID: 36068382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy and eligibility of Bonwill⁃Hawley arch form established by CBCT image for dental crowding measurement: a comparative study with the conventional brass wire and caliper methods.
Wang XM; Meng WY; Wang WN; Huo YF; Xue H
Clin Oral Investig; 2023 Jul; 27(7):3961-3972. PubMed ID: 37071219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the reliability and accuracy of clinical measurements using plaster model and the digital model system based on crowding severity.
Liang YM; Rutchakitprakarn L; Kuang SH; Wu TY
J Chin Med Assoc; 2018 Sep; 81(9):842-847. PubMed ID: 29395944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intra-arch dimensional measurement validity of laser-scanned digital dental models compared with the original plaster models: a systematic review.
De Luca Canto G; Pachêco-Pereira C; Lagravere MO; Flores-Mir C; Major PW
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2015 May; 18(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 25677755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
