These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34988775)

  • 1. Modeling Conditional Dependence of Response Accuracy and Response Time with the Diffusion Item Response Theory Model.
    Kang I; De Boeck P; Ratcliff R
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):725-748. PubMed ID: 34988775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterizing the Manifest Probability Distributions of Three Latent Trait Models for Accuracy and Response Time.
    Marsman M; Sigurdardóttir H; Bolsinova M; Maris G
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):870-891. PubMed ID: 30919229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A Latent Space Diffusion Item Response Theory Model to Explore Conditional Dependence between Responses and Response Times.
    Kang I; Jeon M; Partchev I
    Psychometrika; 2023 Sep; 88(3):830-864. PubMed ID: 37316615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modeling Differences Between Response Times of Correct and Incorrect Responses.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2019 Dec; 84(4):1018-1046. PubMed ID: 31463656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response moderation models for conditional dependence between response time and response accuracy.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J; Molenaar D
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):257-279. PubMed ID: 27618470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of Discontinue Rules on Psychometric Properties of Test Scores.
    von Davier M; Cho Y; Pan T
    Psychometrika; 2019 Mar; 84(1):147-163. PubMed ID: 30607661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling Nonlinear Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy.
    Bolsinova M; Molenaar D
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1525. PubMed ID: 30245650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using Response Times to Model Not-Reached Items due to Time Limits.
    Pohl S; Ulitzsch E; von Davier M
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):892-920. PubMed ID: 31054065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Analysing model fit of psychometric process models: An overview, a new test and an application to the diffusion model.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):209-224. PubMed ID: 28474770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cognitive psychology meets psychometric theory: on the relation between process models for decision making and latent variable models for individual differences.
    van der Maas HLJ; Molenaar D; Maris G; Kievit RA; Borsboom D
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Apr; 118(2):339-356. PubMed ID: 21401290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimum Distance Estimation of Multidimensional Diffusion-Based Item Response Theory Models.
    Ranger J; Kuhn JT; Szardenings C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(6):941-957. PubMed ID: 32019358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of item response models for accuracy and speed of item responses with applications to adaptive testing.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):317-345. PubMed ID: 28474769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring psychometric functions with the diffusion model.
    Ratcliff R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):870-88. PubMed ID: 24446719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling Within-Item Dependencies in Parallel Data on Test Responses and Brain Activation.
    Jeon M; De Boeck P; Luo J; Li X; Lu ZL
    Psychometrika; 2021 Mar; 86(1):239-271. PubMed ID: 33486707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Generalized Speed-Accuracy Response Model for Dichotomous Items.
    van Rijn PW; Ali US
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):109-131. PubMed ID: 29164449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Modelling Conditional Dependence Between Response Time and Accuracy.
    Bolsinova M; de Boeck P; Tijmstra J
    Psychometrika; 2017 Dec; 82(4):1126-1148. PubMed ID: 27738955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving precision of ability estimation: Getting more from response times.
    Bolsinova M; Tijmstra J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Feb; 71(1):13-38. PubMed ID: 28635139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Conditional Dependence across Slow and Fast Item Responses: With a Latent Space Item Response Modeling Approach.
    Kim N; Jeon M; Partchev I
    J Intell; 2024 Feb; 12(2):. PubMed ID: 38392179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Modeling Framework to Examine Psychological Processes Underlying Ordinal Responses and Response Times of Psychometric Data.
    Kang I; Molenaar D; Ratcliff R
    Psychometrika; 2023 Sep; 88(3):940-974. PubMed ID: 37171779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Asymmetric Item Characteristic Curves and Item Complexity: Insights from Simulation and Real Data Analyses.
    Lee S; Bolt DM
    Psychometrika; 2018 Jun; 83(2):453-475. PubMed ID: 28948426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.