These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34989598)

  • 1. Validating dietary assessment tools with energy expenditure measurement methods: Is this accurate?
    Hejazi J
    Int J Vitam Nutr Res; 2023 Feb; 93(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 34989598
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Energy Intake Derived from an Energy Balance Equation, Validated Activity Monitors, and Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry Can Provide Acceptable Caloric Intake Data among Young Adults.
    Shook RP; Hand GA; O'Connor DP; Thomas DM; Hurley TG; Hébert JR; Drenowatz C; Welk GJ; Carriquiry AL; Blair SN
    J Nutr; 2018 Mar; 148(3):490-496. PubMed ID: 29546294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance and Feasibility of Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool in Relation to Other Self-Report Tools and Biomarkers in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study.
    Subar AF; Potischman N; Dodd KW; Thompson FE; Baer DJ; Schoeller DA; Midthune D; Kipnis V; Kirkpatrick SI; Mittl B; Zimmerman TP; Douglass D; Bowles HR; Park Y
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2020 Nov; 120(11):1805-1820. PubMed ID: 32819883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Misreport of energy intake assessed with food records and 24-h recalls compared with total energy expenditure estimated with DLW.
    Lopes TS; Luiz RR; Hoffman DJ; Ferriolli E; Pfrimer K; Moura AS; Sichieri R; Pereira RA
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2016 Nov; 70(11):1259-1264. PubMed ID: 27273069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of energy expenditure measurements by diet records, energy intake balance, doubly labeled water and room calorimetry.
    Seale JL; Rumpler WV
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1997 Dec; 51(12):856-63. PubMed ID: 9426361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Validation of dietary intakes of protein and energy against 24 hour urinary N and DLW energy expenditure in middle-aged women, retired men and post-obese subjects: comparisons with validation against presumed energy requirements.
    Black AE; Bingham SA; Johansson G; Coward WA
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1997 Jun; 51(6):405-13. PubMed ID: 9192200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dietary intakes assessed by 24-h recalls in peri-urban African adolescents: validity of energy intake compared with estimated energy expenditure.
    Rankin D; Ellis SM; Macintyre UE; Hanekom SM; Wright HH
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2011 Aug; 65(8):910-9. PubMed ID: 21559040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Energy intake in short bowel syndrome: assessment by 24-h dietary recalls compared with the doubly labelled water method.
    Fassini PG; Das SK; Pfrimer K; Suen VMM; Sérgio Marchini J; Ferriolli E
    Br J Nutr; 2018 Jan; 119(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 29268807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of energy intake measurements determined from observer-recorded food records and recall methods compared with the doubly labeled water method in overweight and obese individuals.
    Hise ME; Sullivan DK; Jacobsen DJ; Johnson SL; Donnelly JE
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2002 Feb; 75(2):263-7. PubMed ID: 11815316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labeled water.
    Burrows TL; Martin RJ; Collins CE
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2010 Oct; 110(10):1501-10. PubMed ID: 20869489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Markers of the validity of reported energy intake.
    Livingstone MB; Black AE
    J Nutr; 2003 Mar; 133 Suppl 3():895S-920S. PubMed ID: 12612176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Energy Intake in Socially Vulnerable Women Living in Brazil: Assessment of the Accuracy of Two Methods of Dietary Intake Recording Using Doubly Labeled Water.
    Lins ILL; Bueno NB; Grotti Clemente AP; Pfrimer K; Sawaya AL; de Menezes Toledo Florêncio TM
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2016 Oct; 116(10):1560-1567. PubMed ID: 27083987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of self-reported dietary intakes from the Automated Self-Administered 24-h recall, 4-d food records, and food-frequency questionnaires against recovery biomarkers.
    Park Y; Dodd KW; Kipnis V; Thompson FE; Potischman N; Schoeller DA; Baer DJ; Midthune D; Troiano RP; Bowles H; Subar AF
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2018 Jan; 107(1):80-93. PubMed ID: 29381789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Validity of 24-h recalls in (pre-)school aged children: comparison of proxy-reported energy intakes with measured energy expenditure.
    Börnhorst C; Bel-Serrat S; Pigeot I; Huybrechts I; Ottavaere C; Sioen I; De Henauw S; Mouratidou T; Mesana MI; Westerterp K; Bammann K; Lissner L; Eiben G; Pala V; Rayson M; Krogh V; Moreno LA;
    Clin Nutr; 2014 Feb; 33(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 23622780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of Energy Intake by a Food Frequency Questionnaire: Calibration and Validation with the Doubly Labeled Water Method in Japanese Older People.
    Watanabe D; Nanri H; Sagayama H; Yoshida T; Itoi A; Yamaguchi M; Yokoyama K; Watanabe Y; Goto C; Ebine N; Higaki Y; Ishikawa-Takata K; Kimura M; Yamada Y;
    Nutrients; 2019 Jul; 11(7):. PubMed ID: 31323937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Can a Web-based food record accurately assess energy intake in overweight and obese women? A pilot study.
    Hutchesson MJ; Truby H; Callister R; Morgan PJ; Davies PS; Collins CE
    J Hum Nutr Diet; 2013 Jul; 26 Suppl 1():140-4. PubMed ID: 23495761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of dietary intakes measured by diet history against 24 h urinary nitrogen excretion and energy expenditure measured by the doubly-labelled water method in middle-aged women.
    Black AE; Welch AA; Bingham SA
    Br J Nutr; 2000 Apr; 83(4):341-54. PubMed ID: 10858692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A systematic review of the validity of dietary assessment methods in children when compared with the method of doubly labelled water.
    Burrows T; Goldman S; Rollo M
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2020 May; 74(5):669-681. PubMed ID: 31391548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of tape-recorded food records in assessing children's dietary intake.
    Lindquist CH; Cummings T; Goran MI
    Obes Res; 2000 Jan; 8(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 10678253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The validity of a web-based FFQ assessed by doubly labelled water and multiple 24-h recalls.
    Medin AC; Carlsen MH; Hambly C; Speakman JR; Strohmaier S; Andersen LF
    Br J Nutr; 2017 Dec; 118(12):1106-1117. PubMed ID: 29202890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.