These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34990187)

  • 21. On Omega Hierarchical Estimation: A Comparison of Exploratory Bi-Factor Analysis Algorithms.
    Garcia-Garzon E; Abad FJ; Garrido LE
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(1):101-119. PubMed ID: 32449372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions.
    Auerswald M; Moshagen M
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Aug; 24(4):468-491. PubMed ID: 30667242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Sandwich Standard Error Estimator for Exploratory Factor Analysis With Nonnormal Data and Imperfect Models.
    Zhang G; Preacher KJ; Hattori M; Jiang G; Trichtinger LA
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jul; 43(5):360-373. PubMed ID: 31235982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Iteration of Partially Specified Target Matrices: Application to the Bi-Factor Case.
    Abad FJ; Garcia-Garzon E; Garrido LE; Barrada JR
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(4):416-429. PubMed ID: 28375697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. One model to rule them all? Using machine learning algorithms to determine the number of factors in exploratory factor analysis.
    Goretzko D; Bühner M
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Dec; 25(6):776-786. PubMed ID: 32134315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reassessment of innovative methods to determine the number of factors: A simulation-based comparison of exploratory graph analysis and next eigenvalue sufficiency test.
    Brandenburg N; Papenberg M
    Psychol Methods; 2024 Feb; 29(1):21-47. PubMed ID: 35925729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The joint structure of normal and pathological personality: further evidence for a dimensional model.
    Hengartner MP; Ajdacic-Gross V; Rodgers S; Müller M; Rössler W
    Compr Psychiatry; 2014 Apr; 55(3):667-74. PubMed ID: 24314825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Validation of the French version of the Body Shape Questionnaire].
    Rousseau A; Knotter A; Barbe P; Raich R; Chabrol H
    Encephale; 2005; 31(2):162-73. PubMed ID: 15959443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Speed and convergence properties of gradient algorithms for optimization of IMRT.
    Zhang X; Liu H; Wang X; Dong L; Wu Q; Mohan R
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1141-52. PubMed ID: 15191303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. VARIMAX AND MAXPLANE ROTATIONAL METHODS UNDER DIFFERENT CONDITIONS OF SAMPLING ERROR AND HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURE.
    Taylor JB; Coyne L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1973 Jan; 8(3):365-78. PubMed ID: 26828661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Factors of schizoid personality.
    Raine A; Allbutt J
    Br J Clin Psychol; 1989 Feb; 28(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 2924025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of physical fitness on second- and third-order personality factors using orthogonal and oblique rotations.
    Ismail AH; Young RJ
    J Clin Psychol; 1976 Apr; 32(2):268-73. PubMed ID: 1262488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Optimizer convergence and local minima errors and their clinical importance.
    Jeraj R; Wu C; Mackie TR
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Sep; 48(17):2809-27. PubMed ID: 14516103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Why sample selection matters in exploratory factor analysis: implications for the 12-item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0.
    Gaskin CJ; Lambert SD; Bowe SJ; Orellana L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):40. PubMed ID: 28283019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimizing principal components analysis of event-related potentials: matrix type, factor loading weighting, extraction, and rotations.
    Dien J; Beal DJ; Berg P
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 116(8):1808-25. PubMed ID: 15996897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Recovering Wood and McCarthy's ERP-prototypes by means of ERP-specific procrustes-rotation.
    Beauducel A
    J Neurosci Methods; 2018 Feb; 295():20-36. PubMed ID: 29175590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Non-differentiable saddle points and sub-optimal local minima exist for deep ReLU networks.
    Liu B; Liu Z; Zhang T; Yuan T
    Neural Netw; 2021 Dec; 144():75-89. PubMed ID: 34454244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Let's compare apples and oranges! A plea to demystify measurement equivalence.
    Boehnke K
    Am Psychol; 2022 Dec; 77(9):1160-1168. PubMed ID: 36595431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. EVIDENCE ON THE SIMPLE STRUCTURE AND FACTOR INVARIANCE ACHIEVED BY FIVE ROTATIONAL METHODS ON FOUR TYPES OF DATA.
    Dielman TE; Cattell RB; Wagner A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 1972 Jan; 7(2):223-42. PubMed ID: 26828604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. High-dimensionality personality structure in the natural language: Further analyses of classic sets of English-language trait-adjectives.
    Saucier G; Iurino K
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2020 Nov; 119(5):1188-1219. PubMed ID: 31714107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.