These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34990525)

  • 1. Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis Is Effective in the Prevention of Febrile Neutropenia and Reduces Mortality in Patients Aged ≥ 75 Years with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-CHOP: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Jeong SH; Kim SJ; Yoon DH; Park Y; Kang HJ; Koh Y; Lee GW; Lee WS; Yang DH; Do YR; Kim MK; Yoo KH; Choi YS; Yun HJ; Yi JH; Jo JC; Eom HS; Kwak JY; Shin HJ; Park BB; Hyun SY; Yi SY; Kwon JH; Oh SY; Kim HJ; Sohn BS; Won JH; Kim SH; Lee HS; Suh C; Kim WS
    Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Oct; 54(4):1268-1277. PubMed ID: 34990525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive Parameters of Febrile Neutropenia and Clinical Significance of G-CSF Receptor Signaling Pathway in the Development of Neutropenia during R-CHOP Chemotherapy with Prophylactic Pegfilgrastim in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
    Kim DY; Nam J; Chung JS; Jeon BE; Lee JH; Jo JC; Kim SW; Shin HJ
    Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Oct; 54(4):1256-1267. PubMed ID: 34990523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of two pegfilgrastim biosimilars: Tripegfilgrastim and pegteograstim.
    Kang KW; Lee BH; Jeon MJ; Yu ES; Kim DS; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Choi CW; Park Y; Kim BS
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6102-6110. PubMed ID: 32633471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of age group on febrile neutropenia risk assessment and management in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP regimens.
    Lugtenburg P; Silvestre AS; Rossi FG; Noens L; Krall W; Bendall K; Szabo Z; Jaeger U
    Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2012 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 23040435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim during the first cycle of R-CHOP to avoid reduction of dose intensity in elderly patients.
    Ise M; Matsuda K; Shimura A; Masamoto Y; Kurokawa M
    Int J Hematol; 2021 Jun; 113(6):823-831. PubMed ID: 33738702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Routine Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia with Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Nivestim) or Pegfilgrastim Is Cost Effective in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients undergoing Curative-Intent R-CHOP Chemotherapy.
    Wang XJ; Tang T; Farid M; Quek R; Tao M; Lim ST; Wee HL; Chan A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148901. PubMed ID: 26871584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incidence and risk factors for febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP: 2-year experience in a single center (STOP FN in NHL 2).
    Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Nishihara A; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Terui Y; Nukada T; Nomura T; Hatake K
    Support Care Cancer; 2020 Feb; 28(2):571-579. PubMed ID: 31093770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of pegfilgrastim approval on relative dose intensity and outcomes of R-CHOP for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
    Morita Y; Kanemasa Y; Sasaki Y; Ohigashi A; Tamura T; Nakamura S; Yagi Y; Kageyama A; Omuro Y; Shimoyama T
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Mar; 101(10):e29028. PubMed ID: 35451406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim for the Primary Prophylactic Effect for Preventing Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Undergoing Rituximab with Dose-adjusted EPOCH Chemotherapy].
    Kataoka T; Sakurashita H; Taogoshi T; Nishigakiuchi R; Murase T; Izumitani S; Saeki Y; Matsuo H
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2019; 139(4):629-633. PubMed ID: 30930398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Hill G; Barron R; Fust K; Skornicki ME; Taylor DC; Weinstein MC; Lyman GH
    J Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 17(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24028444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patterns of neutropenia and risk factors for febrile neutropenia of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with rituximab-CHOP.
    Choi YW; Jeong SH; Ahn MS; Lee HW; Kang SY; Choi JH; Jin UR; Park JS
    J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Nov; 29(11):1493-500. PubMed ID: 25408580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Front-line immunochemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma using dose-dense rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and pegfilgrastim as support.
    Cabanillas F; Cotto M; Liboy I; Rivera E; Pavia OA; Bruno M
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1929-33. PubMed ID: 22448918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP chemotherapy treatment without adversely affecting their quality of life: cost-benefit and quality of life analysis.
    Lee S; Knox A; Zeng IS; Coomarasamy C; Blacklock H; Issa S
    Support Care Cancer; 2013 Mar; 21(3):841-6. PubMed ID: 22972488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors for the optimal selection of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor preparations and predictors for R-CHOP dose reductions/delays among patients with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (STOP FN in NHL 2 subanalysis).
    Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Nukada T; Hatake K; Terui Y
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):358. PubMed ID: 33823836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis and risk of infection, by chemotherapy cycle and regimen, among patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Langeberg WJ; Siozon CC; Page JH; Morrow PK; Chia VM
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Aug; 22(8):2167-75. PubMed ID: 24652049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Days of prophylactic filgrastim use to reduce febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with chemotherapy.
    Scott SD; Chrischilles EA; Link BK; Delgado DJ; Fridman M; Stolshek BS
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2003; 9(2 Suppl):15-21. PubMed ID: 14613340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.