BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34990525)

  • 1. Pegfilgrastim Prophylaxis Is Effective in the Prevention of Febrile Neutropenia and Reduces Mortality in Patients Aged ≥ 75 Years with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Treated with R-CHOP: A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Jeong SH; Kim SJ; Yoon DH; Park Y; Kang HJ; Koh Y; Lee GW; Lee WS; Yang DH; Do YR; Kim MK; Yoo KH; Choi YS; Yun HJ; Yi JH; Jo JC; Eom HS; Kwak JY; Shin HJ; Park BB; Hyun SY; Yi SY; Kwon JH; Oh SY; Kim HJ; Sohn BS; Won JH; Kim SH; Lee HS; Suh C; Kim WS
    Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Oct; 54(4):1268-1277. PubMed ID: 34990525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive Parameters of Febrile Neutropenia and Clinical Significance of G-CSF Receptor Signaling Pathway in the Development of Neutropenia during R-CHOP Chemotherapy with Prophylactic Pegfilgrastim in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
    Kim DY; Nam J; Chung JS; Jeon BE; Lee JH; Jo JC; Kim SW; Shin HJ
    Cancer Res Treat; 2022 Oct; 54(4):1256-1267. PubMed ID: 34990523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy and safety of two pegfilgrastim biosimilars: Tripegfilgrastim and pegteograstim.
    Kang KW; Lee BH; Jeon MJ; Yu ES; Kim DS; Lee SR; Sung HJ; Choi CW; Park Y; Kim BS
    Cancer Med; 2020 Sep; 9(17):6102-6110. PubMed ID: 32633471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of age group on febrile neutropenia risk assessment and management in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma treated with R-CHOP regimens.
    Lugtenburg P; Silvestre AS; Rossi FG; Noens L; Krall W; Bendall K; Szabo Z; Jaeger U
    Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk; 2012 Oct; 12(5):297-305. PubMed ID: 23040435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of pegfilgrastim versus 6-day filgrastim primary prophylaxis in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving CHOP-21 in United States.
    Lyman G; Lalla A; Barron R; Dubois RW
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2009 Feb; 25(2):401-11. PubMed ID: 19192985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim during the first cycle of R-CHOP to avoid reduction of dose intensity in elderly patients.
    Ise M; Matsuda K; Shimura A; Masamoto Y; Kurokawa M
    Int J Hematol; 2021 Jun; 113(6):823-831. PubMed ID: 33738702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Routine Primary Prophylaxis for Febrile Neutropenia with Biosimilar Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor (Nivestim) or Pegfilgrastim Is Cost Effective in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Patients undergoing Curative-Intent R-CHOP Chemotherapy.
    Wang XJ; Tang T; Farid M; Quek R; Tao M; Lim ST; Wee HL; Chan A
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148901. PubMed ID: 26871584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incidence and risk factors for febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with non-Hodgkin B cell lymphoma receiving R-CHOP: 2-year experience in a single center (STOP FN in NHL 2).
    Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Nishihara A; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Terui Y; Nukada T; Nomura T; Hatake K
    Support Care Cancer; 2020 Feb; 28(2):571-579. PubMed ID: 31093770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of pegfilgrastim approval on relative dose intensity and outcomes of R-CHOP for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
    Morita Y; Kanemasa Y; Sasaki Y; Ohigashi A; Tamura T; Nakamura S; Yagi Y; Kageyama A; Omuro Y; Shimoyama T
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2022 Mar; 101(10):e29028. PubMed ID: 35451406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of Pegfilgrastim and Filgrastim for the Primary Prophylactic Effect for Preventing Febrile Neutropenia in Patients Undergoing Rituximab with Dose-adjusted EPOCH Chemotherapy].
    Kataoka T; Sakurashita H; Taogoshi T; Nishigakiuchi R; Murase T; Izumitani S; Saeki Y; Matsuo H
    Yakugaku Zasshi; 2019; 139(4):629-633. PubMed ID: 30930398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.
    Puértolas I; Frutos Pérez-Surio A; Alcácera MA; Andrés R; Salvador MDT
    Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 74(3):315-321. PubMed ID: 29152672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim (Nivestim™), reference Amgen filgrastim and pegfilgrastim in febrile neutropenia primary prevention in breast cancer patients treated with neo(adjuvant) TAC: a non-interventional cohort study.
    Brito M; Esteves S; André R; Isidoro M; Moreira A
    Support Care Cancer; 2016 Feb; 24(2):597-603. PubMed ID: 26111956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Primary vs secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim for the reduction of febrile neutropenia risk in patients receiving chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: cost-effectiveness analyses.
    Hill G; Barron R; Fust K; Skornicki ME; Taylor DC; Weinstein MC; Lyman GH
    J Med Econ; 2014 Jan; 17(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 24028444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patterns of neutropenia and risk factors for febrile neutropenia of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with rituximab-CHOP.
    Choi YW; Jeong SH; Ahn MS; Lee HW; Kang SY; Choi JH; Jin UR; Park JS
    J Korean Med Sci; 2014 Nov; 29(11):1493-500. PubMed ID: 25408580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Front-line immunochemotherapy for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma using dose-dense rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone plus granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor and pegfilgrastim as support.
    Cabanillas F; Cotto M; Liboy I; Rivera E; Pavia OA; Bruno M
    Leuk Lymphoma; 2012 Oct; 53(10):1929-33. PubMed ID: 22448918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Prophylaxis Treatment Strategies to Reduce the Incidence of Febrile Neutropenia in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.
    Fust K; Li X; Maschio M; Villa G; Parthan A; Barron R; Weinstein MC; Somers L; Hoefkens C; Lyman GH
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2017 Apr; 35(4):425-438. PubMed ID: 27928760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF) reduces the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) receiving CHOP chemotherapy treatment without adversely affecting their quality of life: cost-benefit and quality of life analysis.
    Lee S; Knox A; Zeng IS; Coomarasamy C; Blacklock H; Issa S
    Support Care Cancer; 2013 Mar; 21(3):841-6. PubMed ID: 22972488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Factors for the optimal selection of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor preparations and predictors for R-CHOP dose reductions/delays among patients with non-Hodgkin B-cell lymphoma (STOP FN in NHL 2 subanalysis).
    Yokoyama M; Kusano Y; Inoue N; Nishimura N; Mishima Y; Nukada T; Hatake K; Terui Y
    BMC Cancer; 2021 Apr; 21(1):358. PubMed ID: 33823836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis and risk of infection, by chemotherapy cycle and regimen, among patients with breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
    Langeberg WJ; Siozon CC; Page JH; Morrow PK; Chia VM
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Aug; 22(8):2167-75. PubMed ID: 24652049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Days of prophylactic filgrastim use to reduce febrile neutropenia in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with chemotherapy.
    Scott SD; Chrischilles EA; Link BK; Delgado DJ; Fridman M; Stolshek BS
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2003; 9(2 Suppl):15-21. PubMed ID: 14613340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.