BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34991146)

  • 1. Variations in Low-Risk Cesarean Delivery Rates in the United States Using the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Definition.
    Ouyang L; Cox S; Ferre C; Xu L; Sappenfield WM; Barfield W
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 139(2):235-243. PubMed ID: 34991146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Racial differences in cesareans: an analysis of U.S. 2001 National Inpatient Sample Data.
    Kabir AA; Pridjian G; Steinmann WC; Herrera EA; Khan MM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):710-8. PubMed ID: 15802395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surgical site infection risk following cesarean deliveries covered by Medicaid or private insurance.
    Yi SH; Perkins KM; Kazakova SV; Hatfield KM; Kleinbaum DG; Baggs J; Slayton RB; Jernigan JA
    Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2019 Jun; 40(6):639-648. PubMed ID: 30963987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing variation in hospital rates of cesarean delivery among low-risk women using 3 different measures.
    Armstrong JC; Kozhimannil KB; McDermott P; Saade GR; Srinivas SK;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 214(2):153-163. PubMed ID: 26593970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coding update of the SMFM definition of low risk for cesarean delivery from ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM.
    Armstrong J; McDermott P; Saade GR; Srinivas SK; ;
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jul; 217(1):B2-B12.e56. PubMed ID: 28412084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the ICD-9-CM to ICD-10-CM transition on the incidence of severe maternal morbidity among delivery hospitalizations in the United States.
    Metcalfe A; Sheikh M; Hetherington E
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Oct; 225(4):422.e1-422.e11. PubMed ID: 33872591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hospital-Level Factors Associated with Anesthesia-Related Adverse Events in Cesarean Deliveries, New York State, 2009-2011.
    Guglielminotti J; Deneux-Tharaux C; Wong CA; Li G
    Anesth Analg; 2016 Jun; 122(6):1947-56. PubMed ID: 27195637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cesarean Delivery Trends Among Patients at Low Risk for Cesarean Delivery in the US, 2000-2019.
    Frappaolo AM; Logue TC; Goffman D; Nathan LM; Sheen JJ; Andrikopoulou M; Wen T; D'Alton ME; Friedman AM
    JAMA Netw Open; 2023 Mar; 6(3):e235428. PubMed ID: 36988955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hospital variation in cesarean delivery rates: contribution of individual and hospital factors in Florida.
    Sebastião YV; Womack L; Vamos CA; Louis JM; Olaoye F; Caragan T; Bubu OM; Detman LA; Curran JS; Sappenfield WM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jan; 214(1):123.e1-123.e18. PubMed ID: 26292046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of severity of illness on cesarean delivery rates in Washington State.
    Hitti J; Walker S; Benedetti TJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):474.e1-474.e5. PubMed ID: 28666693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cesarean delivery on maternal request in the United States from 1999 to 2015.
    Trahan MJ; Czuzoj-Shulman N; Abenhaim HA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Mar; 226(3):411.e1-411.e8. PubMed ID: 34627780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Maternal clinical diagnoses and hospital variation in the risk of cesarean delivery: analyses of a National US Hospital Discharge Database.
    Kozhimannil KB; Arcaya MC; Subramanian SV
    PLoS Med; 2014 Oct; 11(10):e1001745. PubMed ID: 25333943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison of the Nulliparous-Term-Singleton-Vertex and Society of Maternal-Fetal Medicine Cesarean Birth Metrics Based on Hospital Size.
    Shields LE; Walker S; Hedriana HL; Wiesner S; Pelletreau B; Hitti J; Benedetti TJ
    Am J Perinatol; 2018 Mar; 35(4):390-396. PubMed ID: 29100260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital volume and cesarean delivery among low-risk women in a nationwide sample.
    Clapp MA; James KE; Melamed A; Ecker JL; Kaimal AJ
    J Perinatol; 2018 Feb; 38(2):127-131. PubMed ID: 29120454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Complications of cesarean deliveries among HIV-infected women in the United States.
    Kourtis AP; Ellington S; Pazol K; Flowers L; Haddad L; Jamieson DJ
    AIDS; 2014 Nov; 28(17):2609-18. PubMed ID: 25574961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Geographic variation in cesarean delivery in the United States by payer.
    Henke RM; Wier LM; Marder WD; Friedman BS; Wong HS
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2014 Nov; 14():387. PubMed ID: 25406813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Effect of Clinical Chorioamnionitis on Cesarean Delivery in the United States.
    Bommarito KM; Gross GA; Willers DM; Fraser VJ; Olsen MA
    Health Serv Res; 2016 Oct; 51(5):1879-95. PubMed ID: 26841089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Hospital Cesarean Delivery-Related Profits and Rates in the United States.
    Sakai-Bizmark R; Ross MG; Estevez D; Bedel LEM; Marr EH; Tsugawa Y
    JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Mar; 4(3):e212235. PubMed ID: 33739430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Delivery-associated sepsis: trends in prevalence and mortality.
    Kendle AM; Salemi JL; Tanner JP; Louis JM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Apr; 220(4):391.e1-391.e16. PubMed ID: 30786257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Variation in Cesarean Delivery Rates Between Public and Private Health Facilities in India From 2005 to 2016.
    Bhatia M; Banerjee K; Dixit P; Dwivedi LK
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Aug; 3(8):e2015022. PubMed ID: 32857148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.