These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34992310)

  • 1. Evaluating Different Scoring Methods for Multiple Response Items Providing Partial Credit.
    Betts J; Muntean W; Kim D; Kao SC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Feb; 82(1):151-176. PubMed ID: 34992310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of Multiple-Select Multiple-Choice Items in a Dental Undergraduate Curriculum: Retrospective Study Involving the Application of Different Scoring Methods.
    Kanzow P; Schmidt D; Herrmann M; Wassmann T; Wiegand A; Raupach T
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 Mar; 9():e43792. PubMed ID: 36841970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Scoring Single-Response Multiple-Choice Items: Scoping Review and Comparison of Different Scoring Methods.
    Kanzow AF; Schmidt D; Kanzow P
    JMIR Med Educ; 2023 May; 9():e44084. PubMed ID: 37001510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple true-false items: a comparison of scoring algorithms.
    Lahner FM; Lörwald AC; Bauer D; Nouns ZM; Krebs R; Guttormsen S; Fischer MR; Huwendiek S
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2018 Aug; 23(3):455-463. PubMed ID: 29189963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Polytomous Scoring Approach to Handle Not-Reached Items in Low-Stakes Assessments.
    Gorgun G; Bulut O
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 81(5):847-871. PubMed ID: 34421122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of three polytomous item response theory models in the context of testlet scoring.
    Cook KF; Dodd BG; Fitzpatrick SJ
    J Outcome Meas; 1999; 3(1):1-20. PubMed ID: 10063769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Item Selection Methods in Multidimensional Computerized Adaptive Testing With Polytomously Scored Items.
    Tu D; Han Y; Cai Y; Gao X
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Nov; 42(8):677-694. PubMed ID: 30559574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Online Calibration of Polytomous Items Under the Generalized Partial Credit Model.
    Zheng Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Sep; 40(6):434-450. PubMed ID: 29881063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polytomous Testlet Response Models for Technology-Enhanced Innovative Items: Implications on Model Fit and Trait Inference.
    Kang HA; Han S; Kim D; Kao SC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Aug; 82(4):811-838. PubMed ID: 35754615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using the dichotomous Rasch model to analyze polytomous items.
    He Q; Wheadon C
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(1):44-56. PubMed ID: 23442327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychometric properties for the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding: dichotomous versus polytomous conventional and IRT scoring.
    Vispoel WP; Kim HY
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Sep; 26(3):878-91. PubMed ID: 24708082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of different scoring approaches upon credit assignment when using Multiple True-False items in dental undergraduate examinations.
    Kanzow P; Schuelper N; Witt D; Wassmann T; Sennhenn-Kirchner S; Wiegand A; Raupach T
    Eur J Dent Educ; 2018 Nov; 22(4):e669-e678. PubMed ID: 29934980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binary items and beyond: a simulation of computer adaptive testing using the Rasch partial credit model.
    Lange R
    J Appl Meas; 2008; 9(1):81-104. PubMed ID: 18180552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Note on the
    Dimitrov DM; Luo Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 79(3):545-557. PubMed ID: 31105322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A comparison of two item-scoring procedures and student reactions to them.
    Essex DL
    J Med Educ; 1976 Jul; 51(7 Pt 1):565-72. PubMed ID: 933134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using multiple response true-false multiple choice questions.
    Bandaranayake R; Payne J; White S
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1999 Apr; 69(4):311-5. PubMed ID: 10327124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polytomous modeling of cognitive errors in computer adaptive testing.
    Wang L; Li CS
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):356-78. PubMed ID: 12011504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Random effects and extended generalized partial credit models.
    Hessen DJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2021 May; 74(2):232-256. PubMed ID: 33305365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item ordering and computerized classification tests with cluster-based scoring: An investigation of the countdown method.
    Finkelman MD; Lowe SR; Kim W; Gruebner O; Smits N; Galea S
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Feb; 30(2):204-219. PubMed ID: 28301192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.