175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34992793)
21. Combinations of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-field Digital Mammography for Different Density Types of Breasts.
Chen Q; Pan X; Xu J; Ying W; Hou Y; Lu M; An D; Peng W
Curr Med Imaging; 2023 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 37018518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Complements Two-Dimensional Synthetic Mammography for Secondary Examination of Breast Cancer.
Nakajima E; Tsunoda H; Ookura M; Ban K; Kawaguchi Y; Inagaki M; Ikeda N; Furukawa K; Ishikawa T
J Belg Soc Radiol; 2021; 105(1):63. PubMed ID: 34786534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Can Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Replace Full-Field Digital Mammography? A Multireader, Multicase Study of Wide-Angle Tomosynthesis.
Georgian-Smith D; Obuchowski NA; Lo JY; Brem RF; Baker JA; Fisher PR; Rim A; Zhao W; Fajardo LL; Mertelmeier T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Jun; 212(6):1393-1399. PubMed ID: 30933648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A comparison between digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for the detection of breast cancers.
Choi WJ; Kim HH; Lee SY; Chae EY; Shin HJ; Cha JH; Son BH; Ahn SH; Choi YW
Breast Cancer; 2016 Nov; 23(6):886-892. PubMed ID: 26534858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus mammography, magnetic resonance imaging plus mammography and mammography alone: A comparison of diagnostic performance in symptomatic women.
Tang W; Hu FX; Zhu H; Wang QF; Gu YJ; Peng WJ
Clin Hemorheol Microcirc; 2017; 66(2):105-116. PubMed ID: 28211806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparing Tumor Characteristics and Rates of Breast Cancers Detected by Screening Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Full-Field Digital Mammography.
Dang PA; Wang A; Senapati GM; Ip IK; Lacson R; Khorasani R; Giess CS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):701-706. PubMed ID: 31613659
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Addition of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Full-Field Digital Mammography in the Diagnostic Setting: Additional Value and Cancer Detectability.
Seo M; Chang JM; Kim SA; Kim WH; Lim JH; Lee SH; Bae MS; Koo HR; Cho N; Moon WK
J Breast Cancer; 2016 Dec; 19(4):438-446. PubMed ID: 28053633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Performance of Screening Breast MRI After Negative Full-Field Digital Mammography Versus After Negative Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Women at Higher Than Average Risk for Breast Cancer.
Roark AA; Dang PA; Niell BL; Halpern EF; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Feb; 212(2):271-279. PubMed ID: 30540208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparing Accuracy of Mammography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Residual Calcified Lesions in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy.
Um E; Kang JW; Lee S; Kim HJ; Yoon TI; Sohn G; Chung IY; Kim J; Lee JW; Son BH; Ahn SH; Ko BS
Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Oct; 18(5):e1087-e1091. PubMed ID: 29703689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Double reading of automated breast ultrasound with digital mammography or digital breast tomosynthesis for breast cancer screening.
Lee JM; Partridge SC; Liao GJ; Hippe DS; Kim AE; Lee CI; Rahbar H; Scheel JR; Lehman CD
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():119-125. PubMed ID: 30807927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The Potential Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on the Benign Biopsy Rate in Women Recalled within the UK Breast Screening Programme.
Sharma N; McMahon M; Haigh I; Chen Y; Dall BJG
Radiology; 2019 May; 291(2):310-317. PubMed ID: 30888932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mammographic density estimation: one-to-one comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using fully automated software.
Tagliafico A; Tagliafico G; Astengo D; Cavagnetto F; Rosasco R; Rescinito G; Monetti F; Calabrese M
Eur Radiol; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1265-70. PubMed ID: 22358426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Comparison of full-field digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis on assessment of the lesions in dense breast: a preliminary study].
Li Y; Ye ZX; Wu T; An YH; Liu PF; Bao RX
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2013 Jan; 35(1):33-7. PubMed ID: 23648297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of digital breast tomosynthesis and magnetic resonance imaging added to digital mammography in women with known breast cancers.
Kim WH; Chang JM; Moon HG; Yi A; Koo HR; Gweon HM; Moon WK
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jun; 26(6):1556-64. PubMed ID: 26376882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Accuracy of digital mammography, ultrasound and MRI in predicting the pathological complete response and residual tumor size of breast cancer after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Sudhir R; Koppula VC; Rao TS; Sannapareddy K; Rajappa SJ; Murthy SS
Indian J Cancer; 2022; 59(3):345-353. PubMed ID: 33753611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Detection of noncalcified breast cancer in patients with extremely dense breasts using digital breast tomosynthesis compared with full-field digital mammography.
Yi A; Chang JM; Shin SU; Chu AJ; Cho N; Noh DY; Moon WK
Br J Radiol; 2019 Jan; 92(1093):20180101. PubMed ID: 30235008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of synthesized two-dimensional mammography and full-field digital mammography alone or in combination with digital breast tomosynthesis.
You C; Zhang Y; Gu Y; Xiao Q; Liu G; Shen X; Yang W; Peng W
Breast Cancer; 2020 Jan; 27(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 31302894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative analysis of radiation dosage and image quality between digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) with two-dimensional synthetic mammography and full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
Choi Y; Woo OH; Shin HS; Cho KR; Seo BK; Choi GY
Clin Imaging; 2019; 55():12-17. PubMed ID: 30703693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative analysis between synthetic mammography reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis and full-field digital mammography for breast cancer detection and visibility.
Murakami R; Uchiyama N; Tani H; Yoshida T; Kumita S
Eur J Radiol Open; 2020; 7():100207. PubMed ID: 33102630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
