These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34992904)

  • 1. Three dimensional custom-made PEEK cranioplasty.
    Hosameldin A; Osman A; Hussein M; Gomaa AF; Abdellatif M
    Surg Neurol Int; 2021; 12():587. PubMed ID: 34992904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Minimizing bone gaps when using custom pediatric cranial implants is associated with implant success.
    Bowers CA; McMullin JH; Brimley C; Etherington L; Siddiqi FA; Riva-Cambrin J
    J Neurosurg Pediatr; 2015 Oct; 16(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 26161719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid high-fidelity contour shaping of titanium mesh implants for cranioplasty defects using patient-specific molds created with low-cost 3D printing: A case series.
    Kinsman M; Aljuboori Z; Ball T; Nauta H; Boakye M
    Surg Neurol Int; 2020; 11():288. PubMed ID: 33033650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Skull Reconstruction with Custom Made Three-Dimensional Titanium Implant.
    Cho HR; Roh TS; Shim KW; Kim YO; Lew DH; Yun IS
    Arch Craniofac Surg; 2015 Apr; 16(1):11-16. PubMed ID: 28913212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The feasibility of producing patient-specific acrylic cranioplasty implants with a low-cost 3D printer.
    Tan ET; Ling JM; Dinesh SK
    J Neurosurg; 2016 May; 124(5):1531-7. PubMed ID: 26566203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two different titanium cranioplasty methods: Custom-made titanium prostheses versus precurved titanium mesh.
    Policicchio D; Casu G; Dipellegrini G; Doda A; Muggianu G; Boccaletti R
    Surg Neurol Int; 2020; 11():148. PubMed ID: 32637201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reconstruction of Large Calvarial Defects Using Titanium Mesh Versus Autologous Split Thickness Calvarial Bone Grafts: A Comprehensive Comparative Evaluation of the Two Major Cranioplasty Techniques.
    Jeyaraj CP
    J Maxillofac Oral Surg; 2018 Sep; 17(3):308-323. PubMed ID: 30034149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Cranioplasty Implants.
    Binhammer A; Jakubowski J; Antonyshyn O; Binhammer P
    Plast Surg (Oakv); 2020 Feb; 28(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 32110643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cranioplasty with three-dimensional customised mould for polymethylmethacrylate implant: a series of 16 consecutive patients with cost-effectiveness consideration.
    da Silva Júnior EB; de Aragão AH; de Paula Loureiro M; Lobo CS; Oliveti AF; de Oliveira RM; Ramina R
    3D Print Med; 2021 Feb; 7(1):4. PubMed ID: 33548008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Management of the Repeatedly Failed Cranioplasty Following Large Postdecompressive Craniectomy: Establishing the Efficacy of Staged Free Latissimus Dorsi Transfer/Tissue Expansion/Custom Polyetheretherketone Implant Reconstruction.
    Mundinger GS; Latham K; Friedrich J; Louie O; Said H; Birgfeld C; Ellenbogen R; Hopper RA
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Nov; 27(8):1971-1977. PubMed ID: 28005736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-designed polyetheretherketone implants versus titanium mesh (± acrylic cement) in alloplastic cranioplasty: a retrospective single-surgeon, single-center study.
    Ng ZY; Ang WJ; Nawaz I
    J Craniofac Surg; 2014; 25(2):e185-9. PubMed ID: 24621767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reconstruction of the immature craniofacial skeleton with a carbonated calcium phosphate bone cement: interaction with bioresorbable mesh.
    Losee JE; Karmacharya J; Gannon FH; Slemp AE; Ong G; Hunenko O; Gorden AD; Bartlett SP; Kirschner RE
    J Craniofac Surg; 2003 Jan; 14(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 12544233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The efficacy of custom-made porous hydroxyapatite prostheses for cranioplasty: evaluation of postmarketing data on 2697 patients.
    Stefini R; Zanotti B; Nataloni A; Martinetti R; Scafuto M; Colasurdo M; Tampieri A
    J Appl Biomater Funct Mater; 2015 Jul; 13(2):e136-44. PubMed ID: 25589160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A biomechanical comparison between cement packing combined with extra fixation and three-dimensional printed strut-type prosthetic reconstruction for giant cell tumor of bone in distal femur.
    Hu X; Lu M; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Min L; Tu C
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Mar; 17(1):151. PubMed ID: 35264178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Customized Cost-Effective Polymethyl-Methacrylate Cranioplasty Implant Using Three-Dimensional Printer.
    Dabadi S; Dhungel RR; Sharma U; Shrestha D; Gurung P; Shrestha R; Pant B
    Asian J Neurosurg; 2021; 16(1):150-154. PubMed ID: 34211884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subtotal calvarial vault reconstruction utilizing a customized polyetheretherketone (PEEK) implant with chimeric microvascular soft tissue coverage in a patient with syndrome of the trephined: A case report.
    Wang JS; Ter Louw RP; DeFazio MV; McGrail KM; Evans KK
    Arch Plast Surg; 2019 Jul; 46(4):365-370. PubMed ID: 31336426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison between autograft alone, bone cement, and demineralized bone matrix in cranioplasty.
    Plum AW; Tatum SA
    Laryngoscope; 2015 Jun; 125(6):1322-7. PubMed ID: 25641743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Histological assessment of porous custom-made hydroxyapatite implants 6 months and 2.5 years after cranioplasty.
    Ono H; Sase T; Tanaka Y; Takasuna H
    Surg Neurol Int; 2017; 8():8. PubMed ID: 28217387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of "custom made" porous hydroxyapatite implants for cranioplasty: postoperative analysis of complications in 1549 patients.
    Stefini R; Esposito G; Zanotti B; Iaccarino C; Fontanella MM; Servadei F
    Surg Neurol Int; 2013; 4():12. PubMed ID: 23493459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Considerations in computer-aided design for inlay cranioplasty: technical note.
    Nout E; Mommaerts MY
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Mar; 22(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 29313149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.