174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34993117)
1. A phantom study comparing low-dose CT physical image quality from five different CT scanners.
Li Y; Jiang Y; Liu H; Yu X; Chen S; Ma D; Gao J; Wu Y
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Jan; 12(1):766-780. PubMed ID: 34993117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Deep-learning image reconstruction for image quality evaluation and accurate bone mineral density measurement on quantitative CT: A phantom-patient study.
Li Y; Jiang Y; Yu X; Ren B; Wang C; Chen S; Ma D; Su D; Liu H; Ren X; Yang X; Gao J; Wu Y
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():884306. PubMed ID: 36034436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance evaluation of a micro-CT system for laboratory animal imaging with iterative reconstruction capabilities.
Muller FM; Vanhove C; Vandeghinste B; Vandenberghe S
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3121-3133. PubMed ID: 35170057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image quality evaluation in deep-learning-based CT noise reduction using virtual imaging trial methods: Contrast-dependent spatial resolution.
Zhou Z; Gong H; Hsieh S; McCollough CH; Yu L
Med Phys; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38555876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study.
Greffier J; Hamard A; Pereira F; Barrau C; Pasquier H; Beregi JP; Frandon J
Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3951-3959. PubMed ID: 32100091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of synthesized normal-resolution image data generated from high-resolution acquisitions on a commercial CT scanner.
Hernandez AM; Shin DW; Abbey CK; Seibert JA; Akino N; Goto T; Vaishnav JY; Boedeker KL; Boone JM
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4775-4785. PubMed ID: 32677085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Task-based characterization of a deep learning image reconstruction and comparison with filtered back-projection and a partial model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: A phantom study.
Racine D; Becce F; Viry A; Monnin P; Thomsen B; Verdun FR; Rotzinger DC
Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():28-37. PubMed ID: 32574999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comprehensive assessment of physical image quality of five different scanners for head CT imaging as clinically used at a single hospital centre-A phantom study.
Barca P; Paolicchi F; Aringhieri G; Palmas F; Marfisi D; Fantacci ME; Caramella D; Giannelli M
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245374. PubMed ID: 33444367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Objective performance assessment of five computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithms.
Omotayo A; Elbakri I
J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 24(6):913-930. PubMed ID: 27612054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A method for characterizing and matching CT image quality across CT scanners from different manufacturers.
Winslow J; Zhang Y; Samei E
Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5705-5717. PubMed ID: 28865170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image Quality and Lesion Detectability of Lower-Dose Abdominopelvic CT Obtained Using Deep Learning Image Reconstruction.
Park J; Shin J; Min IK; Bae H; Kim YE; Chung YE
Korean J Radiol; 2022 Apr; 23(4):402-412. PubMed ID: 35289146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Deep Learning Reconstruction at CT: Phantom Study of the Image Characteristics.
Higaki T; Nakamura Y; Zhou J; Yu Z; Nemoto T; Tatsugami F; Awai K
Acad Radiol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):82-87. PubMed ID: 31818389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Noise and spatial resolution properties of a commercially available deep learning-based CT reconstruction algorithm.
Solomon J; Lyu P; Marin D; Samei E
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3961-3971. PubMed ID: 32506661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Radiation dose reduction using deep learning-based image reconstruction for a low-dose chest computed tomography protocol: a phantom study.
Jung Y; Hur J; Han K; Imai Y; Hong YJ; Im DJ; Lee KH; Desnoyers M; Thomsen B; Shigemasa R; Um K; Jang K
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Mar; 13(3):1937-1947. PubMed ID: 36915339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impact of noise reduction on radiation dose reduction potential of virtual monochromatic spectral images: Comparison of phantom images with conventional 120 kVp images using deep learning image reconstruction and hybrid iterative reconstruction.
Masuda S; Yamada Y; Minamishima K; Owaki Y; Yamazaki A; Jinzaki M
Eur J Radiol; 2022 Apr; 149():110198. PubMed ID: 35168172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
