These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34993117)

  • 1. A phantom study comparing low-dose CT physical image quality from five different CT scanners.
    Li Y; Jiang Y; Liu H; Yu X; Chen S; Ma D; Gao J; Wu Y
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2022 Jan; 12(1):766-780. PubMed ID: 34993117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Deep-learning image reconstruction for image quality evaluation and accurate bone mineral density measurement on quantitative CT: A phantom-patient study.
    Li Y; Jiang Y; Yu X; Ren B; Wang C; Chen S; Ma D; Su D; Liu H; Ren X; Yang X; Gao J; Wu Y
    Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():884306. PubMed ID: 36034436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance evaluation of a micro-CT system for laboratory animal imaging with iterative reconstruction capabilities.
    Muller FM; Vanhove C; Vandeghinste B; Vandenberghe S
    Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):3121-3133. PubMed ID: 35170057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Image quality evaluation in deep-learning-based CT noise reduction using virtual imaging trial methods: Contrast-dependent spatial resolution.
    Zhou Z; Gong H; Hsieh S; McCollough CH; Yu L
    Med Phys; 2024 Aug; 51(8):5399-5413. PubMed ID: 38555876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
    Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image quality and dose reduction opportunity of deep learning image reconstruction algorithm for CT: a phantom study.
    Greffier J; Hamard A; Pereira F; Barrau C; Pasquier H; Beregi JP; Frandon J
    Eur Radiol; 2020 Jul; 30(7):3951-3959. PubMed ID: 32100091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of synthesized normal-resolution image data generated from high-resolution acquisitions on a commercial CT scanner.
    Hernandez AM; Shin DW; Abbey CK; Seibert JA; Akino N; Goto T; Vaishnav JY; Boedeker KL; Boone JM
    Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):4775-4785. PubMed ID: 32677085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
    van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comprehensive assessment of physical image quality of five different scanners for head CT imaging as clinically used at a single hospital centre-A phantom study.
    Barca P; Paolicchi F; Aringhieri G; Palmas F; Marfisi D; Fantacci ME; Caramella D; Giannelli M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0245374. PubMed ID: 33444367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of Image Quality and Detectability of Deep Learning Image Reconstruction (DLIR) Algorithm in Single- and Dual-energy CT.
    Zhong J; Shen H; Chen Y; Xia Y; Shi X; Lu W; Li J; Xing Y; Hu Y; Ge X; Ding D; Jiang Z; Yao W
    J Digit Imaging; 2023 Aug; 36(4):1390-1407. PubMed ID: 37071291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Task-based characterization of a deep learning image reconstruction and comparison with filtered back-projection and a partial model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: A phantom study.
    Racine D; Becce F; Viry A; Monnin P; Thomsen B; Verdun FR; Rotzinger DC
    Phys Med; 2020 Aug; 76():28-37. PubMed ID: 32574999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Objective performance assessment of five computed tomography iterative reconstruction algorithms.
    Omotayo A; Elbakri I
    J Xray Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 24(6):913-930. PubMed ID: 27612054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
    Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of an artificial intelligence deep-learning reconstruction algorithm for CT on image quality and potential dose reduction: A phantom study.
    Greffier J; Si-Mohamed S; Frandon J; Loisy M; de Oliveira F; Beregi JP; Dabli D
    Med Phys; 2022 Aug; 49(8):5052-5063. PubMed ID: 35696272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A systematic task-based image quality assessment of photon-counting and energy integrating CT as a function of reconstruction kernel and phantom size.
    Bhattarai M; Bache S; Abadi E; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):1047-1060. PubMed ID: 37469179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A method for characterizing and matching CT image quality across CT scanners from different manufacturers.
    Winslow J; Zhang Y; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 44(11):5705-5717. PubMed ID: 28865170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance evaluation of an 85-cm-bore X-ray computed tomography scanner designed for radiation oncology and comparison with current diagnostic CT scanners.
    Garcia-Ramirez JL; Mutic S; Dempsey JF; Low DA; Purdy JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Mar; 52(4):1123-31. PubMed ID: 11958910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Is it possible to use low-dose deep learning reconstruction for the detection of liver metastases on CT routinely?
    Lyu P; Liu N; Harrawood B; Solomon J; Wang H; Chen Y; Rigiroli F; Ding Y; Schwartz FR; Jiang H; Lowry C; Wang L; Samei E; Gao J; Marin D
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Mar; 33(3):1629-1640. PubMed ID: 36323984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image Quality and Lesion Detectability of Lower-Dose Abdominopelvic CT Obtained Using Deep Learning Image Reconstruction.
    Park J; Shin J; Min IK; Bae H; Kim YE; Chung YE
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 Apr; 23(4):402-412. PubMed ID: 35289146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.