123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34994584)
1. Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Grading Systems: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.
Khoury ZH; Sultan M; Sultan AS
Int J Surg Pathol; 2022 Aug; 30(5):499-511. PubMed ID: 34994584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability in two grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia: A multi-centre study in India.
Ranganathan K; Kavitha L; Sharada P; Bavle RM; Rao RS; Pattanshetty SM; Hazarey VK; Madhura MG; Nagaraj T; Lingappa A; Warnakulasuriya S
J Oral Pathol Med; 2020 Oct; 49(9):948-955. PubMed ID: 32516857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: Points to ponder.
Geetha KM; Leeky M; Narayan TV; Sadhana S; Saleha J
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2015; 19(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 26604497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproducibility of grading systems in oral epithelial dysplasia.
Manchanda A; Shetty DC
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Nov; 17(6):e935-42. PubMed ID: 22549675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Grading systems of oral cavity pre-malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yan F; Reddy PD; Nguyen SA; Chi AC; Neville BW; Day TA
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Nov; 277(11):2967-2976. PubMed ID: 32447493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: an attempt to understand the sources of variation.
Kujan O; Khattab A; Oliver RJ; Roberts SA; Thakker N; Sloan P
Oral Oncol; 2007 Mar; 43(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 16931119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Calibration improves the agreement in grading oral epithelial dysplasia-Findings from a National Workshop in Malaysia.
Kallarakkal TG; Zaini ZM; Ghani WMN; Karen-Ng LP; Siriwardena BSMS; Cheong SC; Tilakaratne WM
J Oral Pathol Med; 2024 Jan; 53(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 38081145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Binary and WHO dysplasia grading systems for the prediction of malignant transformation of oral leukoplakia and erythroplakia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
de Freitas Silva BS; Batista DCR; de Souza Roriz CF; Silva LR; Normando AGC; Dos Santos Silva AR; Silva MAG; Yamamoto-Silva FP
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Jul; 25(7):4329-4340. PubMed ID: 34050426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Oral epithelial dysplasia: Recognition, grading and clinical significance.
Odell E; Kujan O; Warnakulasuriya S; Sloan P
Oral Dis; 2021 Nov; 27(8):1947-1976. PubMed ID: 34418233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability in Diagnosis of Oral Dysplasia.
R SA; B N P; Hegde U; K U; G S; G K; Sil S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Dec; 18(12):3251-3254. PubMed ID: 29286215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The clinical utility of contemporary oral epithelial dysplasia grading systems.
Sathasivam HP; Sloan P; Thomson PJ; Robinson M
J Oral Pathol Med; 2022 Feb; 51(2):180-187. PubMed ID: 34797585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Risk for Transformation to Cancer: Comparison Between Histologic Grading Systems Versus S100A7 Immunohistochemical Signature-based Grading.
Darling MR; Hwang JTK; Dickson BJ; Cutz JC; Salama S; McCord C; Pritzker KPH; Mock D; Thompson LDR
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2023 Jul; 31(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 37249075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inter- and intra-observer variability in three grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia.
Krishnan L; Karpagaselvi K; Kumarswamy J; Sudheendra US; Santosh KV; Patil A
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2016; 20(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 27601820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lack of association between dental implants and oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Afrashtehfar KI; Almomani MM; Momani M
Evid Based Dent; 2022 Mar; 23(1):40-42. PubMed ID: 35338331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Observer agreement in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia.
Brothwell DJ; Lewis DW; Bradley G; Leong I; Jordan RC; Mock D; Leake JL
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Aug; 31(4):300-5. PubMed ID: 12846853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Recent Developments in Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Grading: A Critical Appraisal.
Patil S; Rao RS; Raj AT
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 Oct; 16(10):i. PubMed ID: 26581468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Combination of Binary System with Ki67 Immunohistochemical Staining: a Reliable Grading Method for Oral Epithelial Dysplasia.
Akafzadeh N; Baghaei F; Derakhshan S; Moradzadeh Khiavi M; Kharazifard M; Aminishakib P
J Dent (Shiraz); 2022 Sep; 23(2 Suppl):377-382. PubMed ID: 36588968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Grading oral epithelial dysplasia: analysis of individual features.
Tilakaratne WM; Sherriff M; Morgan PR; Odell EW
J Oral Pathol Med; 2011 Aug; 40(7):533-40. PubMed ID: 21501232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a new binary system of grading oral epithelial dysplasia for prediction of malignant transformation.
Kujan O; Oliver RJ; Khattab A; Roberts SA; Thakker N; Sloan P
Oral Oncol; 2006 Nov; 42(10):987-93. PubMed ID: 16731030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ki67, CD105, and α-SMA expressions better relate the binary oral epithelial dysplasia grading system of World Health Organization.
Gadbail AR; Chaudhary MS; Sarode SC; Gawande M; Korde S; Tekade SA; Gondivkar S; Hande A; Maladhari R
J Oral Pathol Med; 2017 Nov; 46(10):921-927. PubMed ID: 28672080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
