These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34997479)

  • 1. Are witnesses able to avoid highly accessible misinformation? Examining the efficacy of different warnings for high and low accessibility postevent misinformation.
    Bulevich JB; Gordon LT; Hughes GI; Thomas AK
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Jan; 50(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 34997479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protecting memory from misinformation: Warnings modulate cortical reinstatement during memory retrieval.
    Karanian JM; Rabb N; Wulff AN; Torrance MG; Thomas AK; Race E
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Sep; 117(37):22771-22779. PubMed ID: 32868423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: the presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility.
    Eakin DK; Schreiber TA; Sergent-Marshall S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):813-25. PubMed ID: 14516215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How eyewitnesses resist misinformation: social postwarnings and the monitoring of memory characteristics.
    Echterhoff G; Hirst W; Hussy W
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Jul; 33(5):770-82. PubMed ID: 16383166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing potentiates new learning in the misinformation paradigm.
    Gordon LT; Thomas AK
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):186-97. PubMed ID: 24027043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Telling a good story: The effects of memory retrieval and context processing on eyewitness suggestibility.
    LaPaglia JA; Chan JCK
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0212592. PubMed ID: 30789952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of postwarning specificity on memory performance and confidence in the eyewitness misinformation paradigm.
    Higham PA; Blank H; Luna K
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2017 Dec; 23(4):417-432. PubMed ID: 28816470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The medium and the message: Comparing the effectiveness of six methods of misinformation delivery in an eyewitness memory paradigm.
    Greene CM; Bradshaw R; Huston C; Murphy G
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Dec; 28(4):677-693. PubMed ID: 34110859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval.
    Paz-Alonso PM; Goodman GS
    Memory; 2008 Jan; 16(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 17852727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Warning before misinformation exposure modulates memory encoding.
    Karanian JM; Thomas AK; Race E
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2024 Jun; 24(3):440-452. PubMed ID: 38504050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Witnesses' susceptibility to misleading post-event information delivered in a social media-style video.
    Sharman SJ; Danby MC; Gray AD
    Memory; 2024; 32(1):100-110. PubMed ID: 38146968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misinformation and warnings in eyewitness testimony: a new testing procedure to differentiate explanations.
    Wright DB
    Memory; 1993 Jun; 1(2):153-66. PubMed ID: 7584263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influences of misleading postevent information: misinformation interference and acceptance.
    Belli RF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1989 Mar; 118(1):72-85. PubMed ID: 2522507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. When Misinformation Improves Memory.
    Putnam AL; Sungkhasettee VW; Roediger HL
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Jan; 28(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 27879321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Undoing suggestive influence on memory: the reversibility of the eyewitness misinformation effect.
    Oeberst A; Blank H
    Cognition; 2012 Nov; 125(2):141-59. PubMed ID: 22883683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The dark side of testing memory: repeated retrieval can enhance eyewitness suggestibility.
    Chan JC; Lapaglia JA
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Dec; 17(4):418-32. PubMed ID: 21859229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resisting misinformation via discrepancy detection: effects of an unaware suspicion cue.
    Sheaffer R; Gal R; Pansky A
    Memory; 2022 Jul; 30(6):695-705. PubMed ID: 33896371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing the influence of directly vs. indirectly encountered post-event misinformation on eyewitness remembering.
    Blank H; Ost J; Davies J; Jones G; Lambert K; Salmon K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Nov; 144(3):635-41. PubMed ID: 24184995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are co-witnesses special? Comparing the influence of co-witness and interviewer misinformation on eyewitness reports.
    Jack F; Zydervelt S; Zajac R
    Memory; 2014; 22(3):243-55. PubMed ID: 23521212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory impairment in the weapon focus effect.
    Saunders J
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):326-35. PubMed ID: 19246347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.