These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34997569)
1. What gaze adds to arrows: Changes in attentional response to gaze versus arrows in childhood and adolescence. Aranda-Martín B; Ballesteros-Duperón MÁ; Lupiáñez J Br J Psychol; 2022 Aug; 113(3):718-738. PubMed ID: 34997569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Explicit vs. implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. eye-gaze spatial congruency effects. Narganes-Pineda C; Chica AB; Lupiáñez J; Marotta A Psychol Res; 2023 Feb; 87(1):242-259. PubMed ID: 35192045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Gaze elicits social and nonsocial attentional orienting: An interplay of shared and unique conflict processing mechanisms. Hemmerich K; Narganes-Pineda C; Marotta A; Martín-Arévalo E; Jiménez L; Lupiáñez J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2022 Aug; 48(8):824-841. PubMed ID: 35666922 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural basis of social attention: common and distinct mechanisms for social and nonsocial orienting stimuli. Narganes-Pineda C; Paz-Alonso PM; Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Chica AB Cereb Cortex; 2023 Nov; 33(22):11010-11024. PubMed ID: 37782936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Target-background segregation in a spatial interference paradigm reveals shared and specific attentional mechanisms triggered by gaze and arrows. Román-Caballero R; Marotta A; Lupiáñez J J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2021 Nov; 47(11):1561-1573. PubMed ID: 34843360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automatic attentional orienting to other people's gaze in schizophrenia. Langdon R; Seymour K; Williams T; Ward PB Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1549-1558. PubMed ID: 27207190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Arrows don't look at you: Qualitatively different attentional mechanisms triggered by gaze and arrows. Marotta A; Román-Caballero R; Lupiáñez J Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2254-2259. PubMed ID: 29546665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are eyes special? Gaze, but not pointing gestures, elicits a reversed congruency effect in a spatial Stroop task. Dalmaso M; Galfano G; Castelli L Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Nov; 85(8):2547-2552. PubMed ID: 37587354 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Attentional control and reflexive orienting to gaze and arrow cues. Ristic J; Wright A; Kingstone A Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):964-9. PubMed ID: 18087967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are there quantitative differences between eye-gaze and arrow cues? A meta-analytic answer to the debate and a call for qualitative differences. Chacón-Candia JA; Román-Caballero R; Aranda-Martín B; Casagrande M; Lupiáñez J; Marotta A Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2023 Jan; 144():104993. PubMed ID: 36496190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Eye gaze versus arrows as spatial cues: two qualitatively different modes of attentional selection. Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Martella D; Casagrande M J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Apr; 38(2):326-35. PubMed ID: 21688940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Are eyes special? Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence for a dissociation between eye-gaze and arrows attentional mechanisms. Marotta A; Lupiáñez J; Román-Caballero R; Narganes-Pineda C; Martín-Arévalo E Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jun; 129():146-152. PubMed ID: 30935837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Attention orienting by eye gaze and arrows reveals flexibility to environmental changes. Zhao S; Uono S; Yoshimura S; Toichi M Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():100-5. PubMed ID: 24866453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue. Brignani D; Guzzon D; Marzi CA; Miniussi C Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 18926835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eye-Gaze direction triggers a more specific attentional orienting compared to arrows. Chacón-Candia JA; Lupiáñez J; Casagrande M; Marotta A PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280955. PubMed ID: 36696435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attentional cueing: Gaze is harder to override than arrows. Schmitz I; Strauss H; Reinel L; Einhäuser W PLoS One; 2024; 19(3):e0301136. PubMed ID: 38547114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Do eyes and arrows elicit automatic orienting? Three mutually exclusive hypotheses and a test. Besner D; McLean D; Young T Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Jul; 74(7):1164-1169. PubMed ID: 33586520 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reversing the reversed congruency effect: directional salience overrides social significance in a spatial Stroop task. Tanaka Y; Okubo M Iperception; 2024; 15(2):20416695241238692. PubMed ID: 38577221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Eye gaze is not unique: The reversed congruency effect on gaze and tongue targets. Tanaka Y; Ishikawa K; Oyama T; Okubo M Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jul; 77(7):1485-1497. PubMed ID: 37705449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Impaired reflexive orienting to social cues in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Marotta A; Casagrande M; Rosa C; Maccari L; Berloco B; Pasini A Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry; 2014 Aug; 23(8):649-57. PubMed ID: 24322656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]