These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34997868)
1. A conservation planning framework for China's national key ecological function area based on ecological risk assessment. Pan F; Song M; Wan Q; Yuan L Environ Monit Assess; 2022 Jan; 194(2):74. PubMed ID: 34997868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ecosystem services in conservation planning: Assessing compatible vs. incompatible conservation. Fang C; Cai Z; Devlin AT; Yan X; Chen H; Zeng X; Xia Y; Zhang Q J Environ Manage; 2022 Jun; 312():114906. PubMed ID: 35390611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Toward ecological function zoning and comparison to the Ecological Redline Policy: a case study in the Poyang Lake Region, China. Xu C; Yang G; Wan R; Ou W; Wang P Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Aug; 28(30):40178-40191. PubMed ID: 33492593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ecological function zoning of Nansi Lake Basin in China based on ecosystem service bundles. Liu Y; Jing Y; Han S Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jul; 30(31):77343-77357. PubMed ID: 37256392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ecological space management and control zoning of Giant Panda National Park from the perspective of ecosystem services and land use. Zhu J; Li Z; Yang J; Yu K; Zhang D; Zhong J Sci Rep; 2024 Aug; 14(1):19951. PubMed ID: 39198479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Delineation of water ecological restoration zoning from a multi-dimensional perspective: A case study in Hechi, a typical karst region]. Gao MW; Hu YC; Liu XW; Liang MY; Kong FJ; Bai YP Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2024 Jun; 35(6):1661-1670. PubMed ID: 39235025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Identifying key areas of ecosystem services potential to improve ecological management in Chongqing City, southwest China. Xiao Y; Xiao Q Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Mar; 190(4):258. PubMed ID: 29600440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ecological function zoning based on ecosystem service bundles and trade-offs: a study of Dongjiang Lake Basin, China. Mo W; Zhao Y; Yang N; Xu Z Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(14):40388-40404. PubMed ID: 36609972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. China's ecological conservation redline: A solution for future nature conservation. Gao J; Wang Y; Zou C; Xu D; Lin N; Wang L; Zhang K Ambio; 2020 Sep; 49(9):1519-1529. PubMed ID: 31970688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anthropogenic risk assessment of riverine habitat using geospatial modelling tools for conservation and restoration planning: a case study from a tropical river Pranhita, India. Kantharajan G; Govindakrishnan PM; Chandran R; Singh RK; Kumar K; Anand A; Krishnan P; Mohindra V; Shukla SP; Lal KK Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(13):37579-37597. PubMed ID: 36572775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Simulating the Impact of Future Climate Change and Ecological Restoration on Trade-Offs and Synergies of Ecosystem Services in Two Ecological Shelters and Three Belts in China. Wang LJ; Ma S; Qiao YP; Zhang JC Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Oct; 17(21):. PubMed ID: 33114783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Territorially ecological restoration zoning and optimization strategy in Guyuan City of Ningxia, China: Based on the balance of ecosystem service supply and demand]. Yue WZ; Hou L; Xia HX; Wei JX; Lu YP Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2022 Jan; 33(1):149-158. PubMed ID: 35224937 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ecological infrastructure planning of large river basin to promote nature conservation and ecosystem functions. Huang L; Wang J; Chen X J Environ Manage; 2022 Mar; 306():114482. PubMed ID: 35033894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ecological restoration zoning of territorial space in China: An ecosystem health perspective. Chen W; Gu T; Xiang J; Luo T; Zeng J; Yuan Y J Environ Manage; 2024 Jul; 364():121371. PubMed ID: 38879965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Integrating priority areas and ecological corridors into national network for conservation planning in China. Liang J; He X; Zeng G; Zhong M; Gao X; Li X; Li X; Wu H; Feng C; Xing W; Fang Y; Mo D Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 626():22-29. PubMed ID: 29331835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Siting MPAs for multiple protecting purposes by co-consideration of ecological importance and anthropogenic impacts. Gong Y; Yang Y; Wang Z; Ye G; Zeng J; Hu W J Environ Manage; 2023 Jul; 337():117718. PubMed ID: 36958282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing functional zoning for Dalingshan Forest Park in China through microcosmic human disturbance evaluation. Chen J; Wang J; Li H; Xu J; Huang J; Deng Y Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Jan; 31(1):1195-1211. PubMed ID: 38038919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Identification of the priority conservation areas of national park: A case study of Lishui City, Zhejiang Province, China]. Hou M; Tang XP; Huang GL; Li RQ Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2020 Jul; 31(7):2332-2340. PubMed ID: 32715699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Spatial evaluation of the ecological value importance of national park in Yarlung Tsangpo Grand Canyon. Duan S; Han F; Li F; Yang Z J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115943. PubMed ID: 36056501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determining critical thresholds of ecological restoration based on ecosystem service index: A case study in the Pingjiang catchment in southern China. Wang C; Tang C; Fu B; Lü Y; Xiao S; Zhang J J Environ Manage; 2022 Feb; 303():114220. PubMed ID: 34864589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]