These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34998134)

  • 1. Development of a focal lesion phantom with clinically relevant lesion characteristics for image quality evaluation of breast ultrasound scanners.
    Browne JE; Cannon LM; Fagan AJ; Cournane S
    Phys Med; 2022 Feb; 94():65-74. PubMed ID: 34998134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contrast-Specific Spherical Lesion Phantoms and Ancillary Analysis Software for the Objective Evaluation of Transrectal Ultrasound System Contrast Detectability.
    Doyle AJ; Cody D; Knight S; King DM; Sullivan FJ; Browne JE
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2022 Aug; 48(8):1615-1627. PubMed ID: 35659496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved method for determining resolution zones in ultrasound phantoms with spherical simulated lesions.
    Kofler JM; Madsen EL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Dec; 27(12):1667-76. PubMed ID: 11839411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessing the performance of ultrasound imaging systems using images from relatively high-density random spherical void phantoms: A simulation study.
    Holland MR
    Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 49(2):878-890. PubMed ID: 34894402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MO-D-218-02: Ultrasound Phantoms in Image Quality Measurements and Performance Assessment.
    Madsen E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part21):3870. PubMed ID: 28518253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasound grayscale image quality comparison between a 2D intracavitary transducer and a 3D intracavitary transducer used in 2D mode: A phantom study.
    Zhou W; Long Z; Tradup DJ; Stekel SF; Browne JE; Brown DL; Hangiandreou NJ
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):134-140. PubMed ID: 31002482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phantoms and automated system for testing the resolution of ultrasound scanners.
    Rownd JJ; Madsen EL; Zagzebski JA; Frank GR; Dong F
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1997; 23(2):245-60. PubMed ID: 9140182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Small lesion detection with resolution enhancement compression.
    Linden P; Sanchez JR; Oelze ML
    Ultrason Imaging; 2010 Jan; 32(1):16-32. PubMed ID: 20690429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Technical Note: Multipurpose CT, ultrasound, and MRI breast phantom for use in radiotherapy and minimally invasive interventions.
    Ruschin M; Davidson SR; Phounsy W; Yoo TS; Chin L; Pignol JP; Ravi A; McCann C
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2508. PubMed ID: 27147361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Porous phantoms for PET and SPECT performance evaluation and quality assurance.
    DiFilippo FP; Price JP; Kelsch DN; Muzic RF
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1183-94. PubMed ID: 15191308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Size-specific optimization of CT protocols based on minimum detectability.
    Zhang Y; Smitherman C; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1301-1311. PubMed ID: 28122119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Monte Carlo simulations of a kilovoltage external beam radiotherapy system on phantoms and breast patients.
    Breitkreutz DY; Weil MD; Zavgorodni S; Bazalova-Carter M
    Med Phys; 2017 Dec; 44(12):6548-6559. PubMed ID: 28986987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image Noise, CNR, and Detectability of Low-Contrast, Low-Attenuation Liver Lesions in a Phantom: Effects of Radiation Exposure, Phantom Size, Integrated Circuit Detector, and Iterative Reconstruction.
    Goenka AH; Herts BR; Dong F; Obuchowski NA; Primak AN; Karim W; Baker ME
    Radiology; 2016 Aug; 280(2):475-82. PubMed ID: 26937709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Investigation of the effect of subcutaneous fat on image quality performance of 2D conventional imaging and tissue harmonic imaging.
    Browne JE; Watson AJ; Hoskins PR; Elliott AT
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jul; 31(7):957-64. PubMed ID: 15972201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Association of automated and human observer lesion detecting ability using phantoms.
    Kofler JM; Lindstrom MJ; Kelcz F; Madsen EL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):351-9. PubMed ID: 15749558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spherical lesion phantoms for testing the performance of elastography systems.
    Madsen EL; Frank GR; Hobson MA; Shi H; Jiang J; Varghese T; Hall TJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Dec; 50(24):5983-95. PubMed ID: 16333168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Polyvinyl chloride plastisol breast phantoms for ultrasound imaging.
    de Carvalho IM; De Matheo LL; Costa Júnior JF; Borba Cde M; von Krüger MA; Infantosi AF; Pereira WC
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Aug; 70():98-106. PubMed ID: 27153374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Localization of spherical lesions in tumor-mimicking phantoms by 3D sparse array photoacoustic imaging.
    Ephrat P; Albert GC; Roumeliotis MB; Belton M; Prato FS; Carson JJ
    Med Phys; 2010 Apr; 37(4):1619-28. PubMed ID: 20443483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multimodal Breast Phantoms for Microwave, Ultrasound, Mammography, Magnetic Resonance and Computed Tomography Imaging.
    Ruvio G; Solimene R; Cuccaro A; Fiaschetti G; Fagan AJ; Cournane S; Cooke J; Ammann MJ; Tobon J; Browne JE
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Apr; 20(8):. PubMed ID: 32340281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.