These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34998579)

  • 1. Transferring the tooth preparation finish line on intraoral digital scans to dental software programs: A dental technique.
    Cabanes-Gumbau G; Palma JC; Kois JC; Revilla-León M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Oct; 130(4):439-443. PubMed ID: 34998579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
    Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reliability of automatic finish line detection for tooth preparation in dental computer-aided software.
    Mai HN; Han JS; Kim HS; Park YS; Park JM; Lee DH
    J Prosthodont Res; 2023 Jan; 67(1):138-143. PubMed ID: 35569999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of CAD/CAM Digital Impressions with Different Intraoral Scanner Parameters.
    Chiu A; Chen YW; Hayashi J; Sadr A
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Feb; 20(4):. PubMed ID: 32093174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of finish line locations of tooth preparation on the accuracy of intraoral scanners.
    Son K; Lee KB
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Feb; 24(1):29-40. PubMed ID: 34006061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interim restoration technique for gingival displacement with a feather-edge preparation design and digital scan.
    Schmitz JH; Valenti M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):580-583. PubMed ID: 31375275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoral Digital Scans for Fabricating Tooth-Supported Prostheses Using a Custom Intraoral Scan Body.
    Gómez-Polo M; Revilla-León M; Limones Á; Cascos R; Gómez-Polo C; Ortega R
    J Prosthodont; 2022 Apr; 31(4):356-361. PubMed ID: 34894032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Precision of Different Intraoral Scanner-Computer Aided Design (CAD) Software Combinations in Digital Dentistry.
    Erozan Ç; Ozan O
    Med Sci Monit; 2020 Jan; 26():e918529. PubMed ID: 31896741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided design expertise affects digital wax patterns of CAD/CAM laminate veneers more than single crowns.
    No-Cortes J; Ayres AP; Son A; Lima JF; Markarian RA; da Silva RLB; Kim JH; Kimura RN; Cortes ARG
    Int J Comput Dent; 2022 Nov; 25(4):361-368. PubMed ID: 36426840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining dental impressions.
    Carbajal Mejía JB; Wakabayashi K; Nakamura T; Yatani H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):392-399. PubMed ID: 28222873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of the impact of various finish line designs and occlusal morphologies on the accuracy of digital impressions.
    Gunel A; Guncu MB; Uzel SM; Aktas G; Arikan H; Reiss N; Turkyilmaz I
    J Dent Sci; 2023 Jul; 18(3):1264-1271. PubMed ID: 37404659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A clinical comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques regarding finish line locations and impression time.
    Koulivand S; Ghodsi S; Siadat H; Alikhasi M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2020 Mar; 32(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 31565836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of occlusal collision corrections completed by two intraoral scanners or a dental design program on the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship.
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Yilmaz B; Alonso Pérez-Barquero J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):191-203. PubMed ID: 37365066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A modified scan technique for multiple abutment teeth using the trim and lock function.
    Valenti M; Valenti A; Cortellini D; Schmitz JH; Canale A
    J Dent; 2023 Feb; 129():104406. PubMed ID: 36566830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan.
    Park GH; Son K; Lee KB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 30598314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Marginal adaptation of zirconium dioxide copings: influence of the CAD/CAM system and the finish line design.
    Euán R; Figueras-Álvarez O; Cabratosa-Termes J; Oliver-Parra R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Aug; 112(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 24445027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Impact of marginal defects on the accuracy of automated finish line detection in tooth preparation.
    Park JH; Lee DH
    Int J Comput Dent; 2023 Nov; 26(4):311-317. PubMed ID: 36749284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Finish line distinctness and accuracy in 7 intraoral scanners versus conventional impression: an in vitro descriptive comparison.
    Nedelcu R; Olsson P; Nyström I; Thor A
    BMC Oral Health; 2018 Feb; 18(1):27. PubMed ID: 29471825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A diagnostically and digitally driven tooth preparation protocol by using a patient monitoring tool with an intraoral scanner.
    Valenti M; Schmitz JH; Cortellini D; Valenti A; Canale A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; 129(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 34045048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital scanning under rubber dam: An innovative method for making definitive impressions in fixed prosthodontics.
    Henarejos-Domingo V; Clavijo V; Blasi Á; Madeira S; Roig M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2021 Oct; 33(7):976-981. PubMed ID: 34008328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.