105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 349988)
1. Computer recognition of ectocervical cells. Classification accuracy and spatial resolution.
Wied GL; Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Puls J; Taylor J; Sychra JJ
Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(6):753-64. PubMed ID: 349988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer recognition of abnormal ectocervical cells. Comparison of the efficacy of contour and textural features.
Sychra JJ; Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Taylor J; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(6):765-9. PubMed ID: 349989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Computer recognition of ectocervical cells: image features.
Bartels PH; Abmayr W; Bibbo M; Burger G; Soost HJ; Taylor J; Wied GL
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Jun; 3(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 7020518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dimensionality reducing displays in cell image analysis.
Sychra JJ; Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1977; 21(6):747-52. PubMed ID: 349987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ellipse test for the reduction of false positive signals in automated cytology.
Tucker JH; Eason P; Stark MH
Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(5):370-6. PubMed ID: 364906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computer recognition of binucleation with overlapping in epithelial cells.
Sychra JJ; Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Taylor J; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 349990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of single-cell classification schemes for computer classification of cervical cells.
Poulsen RS; Oliver LH; Toussaint GT; Louis C
Anal Quant Cytol; 1981 Sep; 3(3):207-15. PubMed ID: 7294540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A system for scanning biological cells in three colors.
Taylor J; Puls J; Sychra JJ; Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1978; 22(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 349991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automatic detection and classification of cells in cervical smears.
Tucker JH
Acta Cytol; 1971; 15(2):138-46. PubMed ID: 4933104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Early cancer diagnosis through automated cytoanalysis (Fazytan system)].
Reinhardt ER; Erhardt R
Microsc Acta Suppl; 1983; 6():121-33. PubMed ID: 6578399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Improvement of pretreatment and input preparations of the cellular specimens for the pattern recognition system].
Matozaki T
Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1983 Feb; 21(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 6632345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Use of the MAGISCAN image analyser in automated uterine cancer cytology.
Pycock D; Taylor CJ
Anal Quant Cytol; 1980 Sep; 2(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 7425440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The advantages of a computerized program of population screening for cervical cancer.
von Haam E
Minerva Ginecol; 1970 Dec; 22(23):1171-4. PubMed ID: 4930079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of magnetic resonance image interpolation on the results of texture-based pattern classification: a phantom study.
Mayerhoefer ME; Szomolanyi P; Jirak D; Berg A; Materka A; Dirisamer A; Trattnig S
Invest Radiol; 2009 Jul; 44(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 19465863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Development and evaluation of automatic nucleus finding routines: thresholding of cervical cytology images.
Taylor J; Bahr GF; Bartels PH; Bibbo M; Richards DL; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1975; 19(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 1096517
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Are signal intensity and homogeneity useful parameters for distinguishing between benign and malignant soft tissue masses on MR images? Objective evaluation by means of texture analysis.
Mayerhoefer ME; Breitenseher M; Amann G; Dominkus M
Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Nov; 26(9):1316-22. PubMed ID: 18448302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Interval-coded texture features for artifact rejection in automated cervical cytology.
Tucker JH; Rodenacker K; Juetting U; Nickolls P; Watts K; Burger G
Cytometry; 1988 Sep; 9(5):418-25. PubMed ID: 3053070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Machine-learning classification of non-melanoma skin cancers from image features obtained by optical coherence tomography.
Jørgensen TM; Tycho A; Mogensen M; Bjerring P; Jemec GB
Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):364-9. PubMed ID: 19159385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrimination of normal and dyskaryotic cells with a new high-resolution system (CIALIS).
Kraus H; Schwarz J; Neumann GK
Anal Quant Cytol; 1983 Mar; 5(1):28-30. PubMed ID: 6846966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cell recognition by multivariate gray value analysis in digitized images.
Bartels PH; Layton JM; Jarkowski TL; Bellamy JC; Bahr GF; Wied GL
Acta Cytol; 1971; 15(3):284-8. PubMed ID: 4933976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
