These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 34998974)

  • 1. World Health Organization fetal growth charts applied in a French birth cohort.
    Hocquette A; Zeitlin J; Heude B; Ego A; Charles MA; Monier I
    J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Mar; 51(3):102308. PubMed ID: 34998974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Which fetal growth charts should be used in France? Position of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF).
    Verspyck E; Senat MV; Monier I; Ego A; Zeitlin J; Subtil D; Visser GHA; Vayssiere C
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Aug; 166(2):783-789. PubMed ID: 38288863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Ciobanu A; Khan N; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the performance of estimated fetal weight charts for the detection of small- and large-for-gestational age newborns with adverse outcomes: a French population-based study.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    BJOG; 2022 May; 129(6):938-948. PubMed ID: 34797926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two-stage approach for prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate and adverse perinatal outcome by routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.
    Akolekar R; Panaitescu AM; Ciobanu A; Syngelaki A; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Oct; 54(4):484-491. PubMed ID: 31271475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the assumptions of customized intrauterine growth charts using national birth studies.
    Hocquette A; Monier I; Blondel B; Dufourg MN; Heude B; Zeitlin J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Apr; 101(4):405-416. PubMed ID: 35224718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prediction of large-for-gestational-age neonate by routine third-trimester ultrasound.
    Khan N; Ciobanu A; Karampitsakos T; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Sep; 54(3):326-333. PubMed ID: 31236963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Chart for estimation of fetal weight 2014 by the French College of Fetal Sonography (CFEF)].
    Massoud M; Duyme M; Fontanges M; ; Combourieu D
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2016 Jan; 45(1):80-5. PubMed ID: 25726254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.
    Nicolaides KH; Wright D; Syngelaki A; Wright A; Akolekar R
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 29696704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unisex vs sex-specific estimated fetal weight charts for fetal growth monitoring: a population-based study.
    Monier I; Ego A; Benachi A; Hocquette A; Blondel B; Goffinet F; Zeitlin J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2022 Jan; 4(1):100527. PubMed ID: 34763120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Fetal growth restriction and intra-uterine growth restriction: guidelines for clinical practice from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.
    Vayssière C; Sentilhes L; Ego A; Bernard C; Cambourieu D; Flamant C; Gascoin G; Gaudineau A; Grangé G; Houfflin-Debarge V; Langer B; Malan V; Marcorelles P; Nizard J; Perrotin F; Salomon L; Senat MV; Serry A; Tessier V; Truffert P; Tsatsaris V; Arnaud C; Carbonne B
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 Oct; 193():10-8. PubMed ID: 26207980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard.
    Cheng Y; Leung TY; Lao T; Chan YM; Sahota DS
    BJOG; 2016 Sep; 123 Suppl 3():48-55. PubMed ID: 27627597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
    Reboul Q; Delabaere A; Luo ZC; Nuyt AM; Wu Y; Chauleur C; Fraser W; Audibert F
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing fetal growth in Africa: Application of the international WHO and INTERGROWTH-21st standards in a Beninese pregnancy cohort.
    Yovo E; Accrombessi M; Agbota G; Hocquette A; Atade W; Ladikpo OT; Mehoba M; Degbe A; Mombo-Ngoma G; Massougbodji A; Jackson N; Fievet N; Heude B; Zeitlin J; Briand V
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0262760. PubMed ID: 35061819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates at 35-37 weeks' gestation: contribution of maternal factors and growth velocity between 32 and 36 weeks.
    Ciobanu A; Anthoulakis C; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 53(5):630-637. PubMed ID: 30912210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21
    Stirnemann J; Villar J; Salomon LJ; Ohuma E; Ruyan P; Altman DG; Nosten F; Craik R; Munim S; Cheikh Ismail L; Barros FC; Lambert A; Norris S; Carvalho M; Jaffer YA; Noble JA; Bertino E; Gravett MG; Purwar M; Victora CG; Uauy R; Bhutta Z; Kennedy S; Papageorghiou AT;
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):478-486. PubMed ID: 27804212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.
    Gleason JL; Reddy UM; Chen Z; Grobman WA; Wapner RJ; Steller JG; Simhan H; Scifres CM; Blue N; Parry S; Grantz KL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Sep; 231(3):338.e1-338.e18. PubMed ID: 38151220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnostic accuracy of individual antenatal tools for prediction of small-for-gestational age at birth.
    Poljak B; Agarwal U; Jackson R; Alfirevic Z; Sharp A
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):493-499. PubMed ID: 27486031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Hadlock Method Is Superior to Newer Methods for the Prediction of the Birth Weight Percentile.
    Blue NR; Savabi M; Beddow ME; Katukuri VR; Fritts CM; Izquierdo LA; Chao CR
    J Ultrasound Med; 2019 Mar; 38(3):587-596. PubMed ID: 30244476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Which fetal growth charts should be used? A retrospective observational study in China.
    Zhao J; Yuan Y; Tao J; Chen C; Wu X; Liao Y; Wu L; Zeng Q; Chen Y; Wang K; Li X; Liu Z; Zhou J; Zhou Y; Li S; Zhu J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2022 Aug; 135(16):1969-1977. PubMed ID: 36070466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.