These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35005485)

  • 1. Comparison of Six Methods of Central Corneal Thickness Measurement in Healthy Eyes.
    Ucak T; Icel E; Tasli NG; Karakurt Y; Yilmaz H; Ugurlu A; Demir M
    Beyoglu Eye J; 2021; 6(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 35005485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measured by Standard Ultrasound Pachymetry, Corneal Topography, Tono-Pachymetry and Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography.
    González-Pérez J; Queiruga Piñeiro J; Sánchez García Á; González Méijome JM
    Curr Eye Res; 2018 Jul; 43(7):866-872. PubMed ID: 29634372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of central corneal thickness measured by ultrasound pachymetry, corneal topography, spectral domain- optical coherence tomography, and non-contact specular microscopy.
    Ulutas HG; Ozkaya G; Amuk Hamidi N
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2023 Jun; 42():103527. PubMed ID: 36966866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Central Corneal Thickness Measurements with Different Imaging Devices: Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy, and Tono-Pachymetry.
    Ceylan A; Onal I; Mergen B; Yildirim Y
    Beyoglu Eye J; 2022; 7(1):54-58. PubMed ID: 35265803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness with Ultrasound Pachymetry, Noncontact Specular Microscopy and Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.
    Erdur SK; Demirci G; Dikkaya F; Kocabora MS; Ozsutcu M
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2018; 33(6):782-787. PubMed ID: 29509052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accuracy of Cirrus HD-OCT and Topcon SP-3000P for measuring central corneal thickness.
    Calvo-Sanz JA; Ruiz-Alcocer J; Sánchez-Tena MA
    J Optom; 2018; 11(3):192-197. PubMed ID: 28254359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of central corneal thickness: ultrasound pachymetry versus slit-lamp optical coherence tomography, specular microscopy, and Orbscan.
    Khaja WA; Grover S; Kelmenson AT; Ferguson LR; Sambhav K; Chalam KV
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2015; 9():1065-70. PubMed ID: 26109840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of central corneal thickness in healthy eyes using ultrasound pachymetry, non-contact specular microscopy and a high-resolution Scheimpflug camera.
    Soulantzou K; Plakitsi A; Chalkiadaki E; Anastasopoulou M; Karmiris E
    Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Feb; 43(2):363-370. PubMed ID: 35864284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with three new optical devices and a standard ultrasonic pachymeter.
    Bayhan HA; Aslan Bayhan S; Can I
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2014; 7(2):302-8. PubMed ID: 24790874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anterior ocular biometry using 3-dimensional optical coherence tomography.
    Fukuda S; Kawana K; Yasuno Y; Oshika T
    Ophthalmology; 2009 May; 116(5):882-9. PubMed ID: 19410946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Agreement and repeatability of central corneal thickness measurements by four different optical devices and an ultrasound pachymeter.
    Gokcinar NB; Yumusak E; Ornek N; Yorubulut S; Onaran Z
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 Jul; 39(7):1589-1598. PubMed ID: 29984376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with different non-contact devices in healthy children.
    Yalcın SO; Kaplan AT
    Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Dec; 40():103045. PubMed ID: 35908681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeatability and agreement of CCT measurement in myopia using entacam and ultrasound pachymetry.
    Luo YH; Zhong Q; Ouyang PB; Guo XJ; Duan XC
    Int J Ophthalmol; 2012; 5(3):329-33. PubMed ID: 22773982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness Measurements Obtained by RTVue OCT, Lenstar, Sirius Topography, and Ultrasound Pachymetry in Healthy Subjects.
    Şimşek A; Bilak Ş; Güler M; Çapkin M; Bilgin B; Reyhan AH
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2016; 31(5):467-72. PubMed ID: 25412328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of central corneal thickness as measured by non-contact specular microscopy and ultrasound pachymetry before and post LASIK.
    Zhao MH; Zou J; Wang WQ; Li J
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007 Dec; 35(9):818-23. PubMed ID: 18173409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Central and peripheral corneal thickness measured with optical coherence tomography, Scheimpflug imaging, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal, keratoconus-suspect, and post-laser in situ keratomileusis eyes.
    Prospero Ponce CM; Rocha KM; Smith SD; Krueger RR
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2009 Jun; 35(6):1055-62. PubMed ID: 19465292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative study of central corneal thickness measurement with slit-lamp optical coherence tomography and visante optical coherence tomography.
    Li H; Leung CK; Wong L; Cheung CY; Pang CP; Weinreb RN; Lam DS
    Ophthalmology; 2008 May; 115(5):796-801.e2. PubMed ID: 17916376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Central corneal thickness measurements after myopic photorefractive keratectomy using Scheimpflug imaging, scanning-slit topography, and ultrasonic pachymetry.
    Faramarzi A; Karimian F; Jafarinasab MR; Jabbarpoor Bonyadi MH; Yaseri M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Sep; 36(9):1543-9. PubMed ID: 20692568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurements with standard ultrasonic pachymetry and optical devices.
    Doğan M; Ertan E
    Clin Exp Optom; 2019 Mar; 102(2):126-130. PubMed ID: 30557910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of central corneal thickness measurement by scanning slit topography, infrared, and ultrasound pachymetry in normal and post-LASIK eyes.
    Ho WC; Lam PT; Chiu TY; Yim MC; Lau FT
    Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Nov; 40(11):2913-2921. PubMed ID: 32617805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.