These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35006053)

  • 1. From the Shadows: The Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's COVID-Free Exercise Cases.
    Parmet WE
    J Law Med Ethics; 2021; 49(4):564-579. PubMed ID: 35006053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion Disclosure Laws and the First Amendment: The Broader Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's Becerra Decision.
    Pomeranz JL
    Am J Public Health; 2019 Mar; 109(3):412-418. PubMed ID: 30676798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Changing the constitutional landscape for firearms: the US Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment decisions.
    Vernick JS; Rutkow L; Webster DW; Teret SP
    Am J Public Health; 2011 Nov; 101(11):2021-6. PubMed ID: 21940936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The US Supreme Court's Rulings on Large Business and Health Care Worker Vaccine Mandates: Ramifications for the COVID-19 Response and the Future of Federal Public Health Protection.
    Gostin LO; Parmet WE; Rosenbaum S
    JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(8):713-714. PubMed ID: 35061000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A decade-long longitudinal survey shows that the Supreme Court is now much more conservative than the public.
    Jessee S; Malhotra N; Sen M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jun; 119(24):e2120284119. PubMed ID: 35666873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Affordable Care Act in Court : Litigation Continues Unabated.
    Perkins J
    N C Med J; 2020; 81(6):386-388. PubMed ID: 33139471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How the Supreme Court's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Rulings Could Shape the Pandemic's Next Phase.
    Abbasi J; Rubin R; Suran M
    JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(8):706-708. PubMed ID: 35061013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Health: Policy or Law? A Population-Based Analysis of the Supreme Court's ACA Cases.
    Parmet WE
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2016 Dec; 41(6):1061-1081. PubMed ID: 27531938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judicial Power and Influence on Population Health.
    Gostin LO
    Milbank Q; 2023 Apr; 101(S1):700-733. PubMed ID: 37096625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Public Carry versus Public Health - The Harms to Come from the Supreme Court's Decision in
    Ulrich MR
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Oct; 387(14):1245-1247. PubMed ID: 36193944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. When the First Amendment and public health collide: the Court's increasingly strict constitutional scrutiny of health regulations that restrict commercial speech.
    Rauer S
    Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(4):690-712. PubMed ID: 23356100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Supreme Court's New Direction and the Public's Health.
    Auerbach JN; Sharfstein JM
    JAMA Health Forum; 2022 Jul; 3(7):e222978. PubMed ID: 36219006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating Intellectual Disability after the
    Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 31533993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Too young to kill? U.S. Supreme Court treads a dangerous path in Roper v. Simmons.
    Sarkar SP
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 17872560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Citizens United, public health, and democracy: the Supreme Court ruling, its implications, and proposed action.
    Wiist WH
    Am J Public Health; 2011 Jul; 101(7):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21421946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Supreme Court's Abortion Exceptionalism - Judicial Deference, Medical Science, and Mifepristone Access.
    Fox D; Cole E
    N Engl J Med; 2021 Jun; 384(24):e94. PubMed ID: 33909959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Supreme Court's spring term: abortion, the right to die, and the decline of privacy rights.
    Wing KR
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 1990; 15(4):919-28. PubMed ID: 2081895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Constitution and the Public's Health: The Consequences of the US Supreme Court's Medicaid Decision in
    Sunkara V; Rosenbaum S
    Public Health Rep; 2016 Nov; 131(6):844-846. PubMed ID: 28123233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Supreme Court's Crisis Pregnancy Center Case - Implications for Health Law.
    Parmet WE; Berman ML; Smith JA
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Oct; 379(16):1489-1491. PubMed ID: 30156965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Supreme Court's abortion decisions: some observations on the exercise of judicial review in the United States.
    Grossman JB
    Sven Juristtidn; 1973; 58(6-7):449-62. PubMed ID: 11663642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.