These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35006053)

  • 1. From the Shadows: The Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's COVID-Free Exercise Cases.
    Parmet WE
    J Law Med Ethics; 2021; 49(4):564-579. PubMed ID: 35006053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Abortion Disclosure Laws and the First Amendment: The Broader Public Health Implications of the Supreme Court's Becerra Decision.
    Pomeranz JL
    Am J Public Health; 2019 Mar; 109(3):412-418. PubMed ID: 30676798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Public Good on the Docket - The Supreme Court's Evolving Approach to Public Health.
    Sharfstein JM; Gostin LO
    N Engl J Med; 2024 May; 390(18):1637-1639. PubMed ID: 38657241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changing the constitutional landscape for firearms: the US Supreme Court's recent Second Amendment decisions.
    Vernick JS; Rutkow L; Webster DW; Teret SP
    Am J Public Health; 2011 Nov; 101(11):2021-6. PubMed ID: 21940936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The US Supreme Court's Rulings on Large Business and Health Care Worker Vaccine Mandates: Ramifications for the COVID-19 Response and the Future of Federal Public Health Protection.
    Gostin LO; Parmet WE; Rosenbaum S
    JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(8):713-714. PubMed ID: 35061000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A decade-long longitudinal survey shows that the Supreme Court is now much more conservative than the public.
    Jessee S; Malhotra N; Sen M
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2022 Jun; 119(24):e2120284119. PubMed ID: 35666873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Affordable Care Act in Court : Litigation Continues Unabated.
    Perkins J
    N C Med J; 2020; 81(6):386-388. PubMed ID: 33139471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How the Supreme Court's COVID-19 Vaccine Mandate Rulings Could Shape the Pandemic's Next Phase.
    Abbasi J; Rubin R; Suran M
    JAMA; 2022 Feb; 327(8):706-708. PubMed ID: 35061013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health: Policy or Law? A Population-Based Analysis of the Supreme Court's ACA Cases.
    Parmet WE
    J Health Polit Policy Law; 2016 Dec; 41(6):1061-1081. PubMed ID: 27531938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Judicial Power and Influence on Population Health.
    Gostin LO
    Milbank Q; 2023 Apr; 101(S1):700-733. PubMed ID: 37096625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Public Carry versus Public Health - The Harms to Come from the Supreme Court's Decision in
    Ulrich MR
    N Engl J Med; 2022 Oct; 387(14):1245-1247. PubMed ID: 36193944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Why Has a Progressive Court Failed to Protect the Prison Population against COVID-19? Mass Incarceration and Brazil's Supreme Court.
    Liang Wang DW; Abreu Ferreira LM; Coelho Filho PS; de Barros M; Homsi JA; Zambom MM; Dos Santos EF
    Health Hum Rights; 2023 Dec; 25(2):67-82. PubMed ID: 38145141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When the First Amendment and public health collide: the Court's increasingly strict constitutional scrutiny of health regulations that restrict commercial speech.
    Rauer S
    Am J Law Med; 2012; 38(4):690-712. PubMed ID: 23356100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Supreme Court Is Harming Public Health and the Environment.
    Gostin LO; Wetter S
    JAMA; 2023 May; 329(18):1549-1550. PubMed ID: 37000439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Supreme Court's New Direction and the Public's Health.
    Auerbach JN; Sharfstein JM
    JAMA Health Forum; 2022 Jul; 3(7):e222978. PubMed ID: 36219006
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluating Intellectual Disability after the
    Updegrove AH; Vaughn MS
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2019 Dec; 47(4):486-492. PubMed ID: 31533993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Too young to kill? U.S. Supreme Court treads a dangerous path in Roper v. Simmons.
    Sarkar SP
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2007; 35(3):364-72. PubMed ID: 17872560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Citizens United, public health, and democracy: the Supreme Court ruling, its implications, and proposed action.
    Wiist WH
    Am J Public Health; 2011 Jul; 101(7):1172-9. PubMed ID: 21421946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Supreme Court Impacts in Public Health Law: 2022-2023.
    Hodge JG; Barraza L; Piatt JL; White EN; Ghaith S; Hollinshead S; Krumholz L; Puchebner M; Smith E
    J Law Med Ethics; 2023; 51(3):684-688. PubMed ID: 38088608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Implications of the Supreme Court's affirmative action decision on underrepresented populations and dermatology.
    Trepanowski N; Grant-Kels JM
    J Am Acad Dermatol; 2023 Dec; 89(6):1320-1321. PubMed ID: 37579841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.