175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35006411)
1. The effect of Q.Clear reconstruction on quantification and spatial resolution of 18F-FDG PET in simultaneous PET/MR.
Tian D; Yang H; Li Y; Cui B; Lu J
EJNMMI Phys; 2022 Jan; 9(1):1. PubMed ID: 35006411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Phantom and Clinical Evaluation of the Bayesian Penalized Likelihood Reconstruction Algorithm Q.Clear on an LYSO PET/CT System.
Teoh EJ; McGowan DR; Macpherson RE; Bradley KM; Gleeson FV
J Nucl Med; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1447-52. PubMed ID: 26159585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF).
Rogasch JM; Suleiman S; Hofheinz F; Bluemel S; Lukas M; Amthauer H; Furth C
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jan; 7(1):2. PubMed ID: 31925574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of Penalized-Likelihood Estimation Reconstruction on a Digital Time-of-Flight PET/CT Scanner for
Lindström E; Sundin A; Trampal C; Lindsjö L; Ilan E; Danfors T; Antoni G; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Jul; 59(7):1152-1158. PubMed ID: 29449445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of various penalty parameter values in Q.Clear algorithm for rectal cancer detection on
Sadeghi F; Sheikhzadeh P; Farzanehfar S; Ghafarian P; Moafpurian Y; Ay M
EJNMMI Phys; 2023 Oct; 10(1):63. PubMed ID: 37843705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance evaluation of the Q.Clear reconstruction framework versus conventional reconstruction algorithms for quantitative brain PET-MR studies.
Ribeiro D; Hallett W; Tavares AAS
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 May; 8(1):41. PubMed ID: 33961164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of block-sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction of
Lindström E; Lindsjö L; Sundin A; Sörensen J; Lubberink M
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Jun; 7(1):40. PubMed ID: 32542512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determination of optimal regularization factor in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction of brain PET images using [
Wagatsuma K; Miwa K; Kamitaka Y; Koike E; Yamao T; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Nezu S; Sugamata Y; Miyaji N; Imabayashi E; Ishibashi K; Toyohara J; Ishii K
Med Phys; 2022 May; 49(5):2995-3005. PubMed ID: 35246870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of sub-centimeter lesions using digital TOF-PET/CT system combined with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm.
Miwa K; Wagatsuma K; Nemoto R; Masubuchi M; Kamitaka Y; Yamao T; Hiratsuka S; Yamaguchi M; Yoshii T; Kobayashi R; Miyaji N; Ishii K
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Oct; 34(10):762-771. PubMed ID: 32623569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative and Qualitative Improvement of Low-Count [
Seo Y; Khalighi MM; Wangerin KA; Deller TW; Wang YH; Jivan S; Kohi MP; Aggarwal R; Flavell RR; Behr SC; Evans MJ
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):208-216. PubMed ID: 30993558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improvement in PET/CT image quality with a combination of point-spread function and time-of-flight in relation to reconstruction parameters.
Akamatsu G; Ishikawa K; Mitsumoto K; Taniguchi T; Ohya N; Baba S; Abe K; Sasaki M
J Nucl Med; 2012 Nov; 53(11):1716-22. PubMed ID: 22952340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on
Kurita Y; Ichikawa Y; Nakanishi T; Tomita Y; Hasegawa D; Murashima S; Hirano T; Sakuma H
Ann Nucl Med; 2020 Apr; 34(4):272-279. PubMed ID: 32060780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The clinical effectiveness of reconstructing
Usmani S; Ahmed N; Gnanasegaran G; Rasheed R; Marafi F; Alnaaimi M; Omar M; Musbah A; Al Kandari F; De Schepper S; Van den Wyngaert T
Br J Radiol; 2021 Apr; 94(1120):20210043. PubMed ID: 33571003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noise reduction using a Bayesian penalized-likelihood reconstruction algorithm on a time-of-flight PET-CT scanner.
Caribé PRRV; Koole M; D'Asseler Y; Van Den Broeck B; Vandenberghe S
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):22. PubMed ID: 31823084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Can a penalized-likelihood estimation algorithm be used to reduce the injected dose or the acquisition time in
Chicheportiche A; Goshen E; Godefroy J; Grozinsky-Glasberg S; Oleinikov K; Meirovitz A; Gross DJ; Ben-Haim S
EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Feb; 8(1):13. PubMed ID: 33580359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Optimization of a Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm (Q.Clear) for
Yoshii T; Miwa K; Yamaguchi M; Shimada K; Wagatsuma K; Yamao T; Kamitaka Y; Hiratsuka S; Kobayashi R; Ichikawa H; Miyaji N; Miyazaki T; Ishii K
EJNMMI Phys; 2020 Sep; 7(1):56. PubMed ID: 32915344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of a Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for low-count clinical
Te Riet J; Rijnsdorp S; Roef MJ; Arends AJ
EJNMMI Phys; 2019 Dec; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 31889228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of a block sequential regularized expectation maximization reconstruction algorithm in 18F-FDG PET/CT studies.
Sah BR; Stolzmann P; Delso G; Wollenweber SD; Hüllner M; Hakami YA; Queiroz MA; Barbosa FG; von Schulthess GK; Pietsch C; Veit-Haibach P
Nucl Med Commun; 2017 Jan; 38(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 27755394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the impact of different penalty factors of the Bayesian reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear on in vivo low count kinetic analysis of [
Ribeiro D; Hallett W; Howes O; McCutcheon R; Nour MM; Tavares AAS
EJNMMI Res; 2022 Feb; 12(1):11. PubMed ID: 35184229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Phantom and clinical evaluation of Block Sequential Regularized Expectation Maximization (BSREM) reconstruction algorithm in 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT studies.
Sadeghi F; Sheikhzadeh P; Kasraie N; Farzanehfar S; Abbasi M; Salehi Y; Ay M
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2023 Sep; 46(3):1297-1308. PubMed ID: 37439965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
