BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35007959)

  • 21. Direct comparison of clinical diagnostic sensitivity of saliva from buccal swabs versus combined oro-/nasopharyngeal swabs in the detection of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.529 Omicron.
    Puyskens A; Michel J; Stoliaroff-Pepin A; Bayram F; Sesver A; Wichmann O; Harder T; Schaade L; Nitsche A; Peine C
    J Clin Virol; 2023 Aug; 165():105496. PubMed ID: 37269606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Higher SARS-CoV-2 detection of oropharyngeal compared with nasopharyngeal or saliva specimen for molecular testing: a multicentre randomised comparative accuracy study.
    Todsen T; Tolsgaard MG; Benfield T; Folke F; Jakobsen KK; Gredal NT; Ersbøll AK; von Buchwald C; Kirkby N
    Thorax; 2023 Oct; 78(10):1028-1034. PubMed ID: 37208187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Combined nasal- and oropharyngeal self-swab provides equivalent performance compared to professionally collected oropharyngeal swabs in detecting SARS-CoV-2 in a real-life setting.
    Hørlyck S; Nielsen SH; Gress T; Schneider U; Martel CJ; Steenhard N; Gredal NT; Mortensen S; Cohen AS
    J Virol Methods; 2023 Mar; 313():114667. PubMed ID: 36572155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 from Saliva as Compared to Nasopharyngeal Swabs in Outpatients.
    Kandel C; Zheng J; McCready J; Serbanescu MA; Racher H; Desaulnier M; Powis JE; Vojdani K; Finlay L; Sheldrake E; Vermeiren C; Katz K; McGeer A; Kozak R; Goneau LW
    Viruses; 2020 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 33212817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A Large Cohort Study of SARS-CoV-2 Detection in Saliva: A Non-Invasive Alternative Diagnostic Test for Patients with Bleeding Disorders.
    Lopes JIF; da Costa Silva CA; Cunha RG; Soares AM; Lopes MED; da Conceição Neto OC; Alves ADR; da Costa Nunes Pimentel Coelho WL; Amorim Filho L; Amado Leon LA
    Viruses; 2021 Nov; 13(12):. PubMed ID: 34960630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of saliva with healthcare workers- and patient-collected swabs in the diagnosis of COVID-19 in a large cohort.
    Sasikala M; Sadhana Y; Vijayasarathy K; Gupta A; Daram SK; Podduturi NCR; Reddy DN
    BMC Infect Dis; 2021 Jul; 21(1):648. PubMed ID: 34225656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Saliva as a testing specimen with or without pooling for SARS-CoV-2 detection by multiplex RT-PCR test.
    Sun Q; Li J; Ren H; Pastor L; Loginova Y; Madej R; Taylor K; Wong JK; Zhang Z; Zhang A; Lu CM; Sha MY
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(2):e0243183. PubMed ID: 33621263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparative evaluation of nasopharyngeal swab and saliva specimens for the molecular detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in Japanese patients with COVID-19.
    Sakanashi D; Asai N; Nakamura A; Miyazaki N; Kawamoto Y; Ohno T; Yamada A; Koita I; Suematsu H; Hagihara M; Shiota A; Kurumiya A; Sakata M; Kato S; Muramatsu Y; Koizumi Y; Kishino T; Ohashi W; Yamagishi Y; Mikamo H
    J Infect Chemother; 2021 Jan; 27(1):126-129. PubMed ID: 33060046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of Specimen Types and Saliva Stabilization Solutions for SARS-CoV-2 Testing.
    Griesemer SB; Van Slyke G; Ehrbar D; Strle K; Yildirim T; Centurioni DA; Walsh AC; Chang AK; Waxman MJ; St George K
    J Clin Microbiol; 2021 Apr; 59(5):. PubMed ID: 33674284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Sensitivity and Costs of Testing for SARS-CoV-2 Infection With Saliva Versus Nasopharyngeal Swabs : A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Bastos ML; Perlman-Arrow S; Menzies D; Campbell JR
    Ann Intern Med; 2021 Apr; 174(4):501-510. PubMed ID: 33428446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Saliva sample for detection of SARS-CoV-2: A possible alternative for mass testing.
    Salu OB; Akase IE; Anyanwu RA; Orenolu MR; Abdullah MA; Giwa-Tubosun T; Oloko SA; Oshinjo AM; Abiola AA; Oyedeji KS; Omilabu SA
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275201. PubMed ID: 36170269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 Detection from Saliva Sampling and Oropharyngeal Swab.
    Clemmensen ML; Bendixen KK; Flugt K; Pilgaard P; Christensen UB
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Oct; 10(5):e0142222. PubMed ID: 36129278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prospective population-level validation of the Abbott ID NOW severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 device implemented in multiple settings for testing asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals.
    Stokes W; Venner AA; Buss E; Tipples G; Berenger BM
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2023 Feb; 29(2):247-252. PubMed ID: 36096431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Nasopharyngeal Swabs Are More Sensitive Than Oropharyngeal Swabs for COVID-19 Diagnosis and Monitoring the SARS-CoV-2 Load.
    Wang H; Liu Q; Hu J; Zhou M; Yu MQ; Li KY; Xu D; Xiao Y; Yang JY; Lu YJ; Wang F; Yin P; Xu SY
    Front Med (Lausanne); 2020; 7():334. PubMed ID: 32626720
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Gargle, Spit, and Sputum Specimens.
    Poukka E; Mäkelä H; Hagberg L; Vo T; Nohynek H; Ikonen N; Liitsola K; Helve O; Savolainen-Kopra C; Dub T
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0003521. PubMed ID: 34431686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnostic Performance Assessment of Saliva RT-PCR and Nasopharyngeal Antigen for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Peru.
    Calderón RI; Jhaveri TA; Tovar MA; Palomino JS; Barreda NN; Sanabria OM; Peinado J; Ramirez C; Llanos Zavalaga LF; Valderrama G; Franke MF; Mitnick CD; Lecca L; Velásquez GE
    Microbiol Spectr; 2022 Aug; 10(4):e0086122. PubMed ID: 35867471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 PCR-Based Detection Using Saliva or Nasopharyngeal Swab Specimens in Asymptomatic Populations.
    Fan G; Qin X; Streblow DN; Hoyos CM; Hansel DE
    Microbiol Spectr; 2021 Sep; 9(1):e0006221. PubMed ID: 34431689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of Nasal Swabs, Nasopharyngeal Swabs, and Saliva Samples for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 and other Respiratory Virus Infections.
    Jung EJ; Lee SK; Shin SH; Kim JS; Woo H; Cho EJ; Hyun J; Kim JS; Kim HS
    Ann Lab Med; 2023 Sep; 43(5):434-442. PubMed ID: 37080744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparing Nasopharyngeal and Midturbinate Nasal Swab Testing for the Identification of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2.
    Pinninti S; Trieu C; Pati SK; Latting M; Cooper J; Seleme MC; Boppana S; Arora N; Britt WJ; Boppana SB
    Clin Infect Dis; 2021 Apr; 72(7):1253-1255. PubMed ID: 32596725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Validation of self-collected buccal swab and saliva as a diagnostic tool for COVID-19.
    Ku CW; Shivani D; Kwan JQT; Loy SL; Erwin C; Ko KKK; Ng XW; Oon L; Thoon KC; Kalimuddin S; Chan JKY
    Int J Infect Dis; 2021 Mar; 104():255-261. PubMed ID: 33401035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.