207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35012271)
41. Short-term Outcomes After Robot-Assisted vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy After the Learning Curve.
Shi Y; Jin J; Qiu W; Weng Y; Wang J; Zhao S; Huo Z; Qin K; Wang Y; Chen H; Deng X; Peng C; Shen B
JAMA Surg; 2020 May; 155(5):389-394. PubMed ID: 32129815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Periampullary adenocarcinoma: analysis of 5-year survivors.
Yeo CJ; Sohn TA; Cameron JL; Hruban RH; Lillemoe KD; Pitt HA
Ann Surg; 1998 Jun; 227(6):821-31. PubMed ID: 9637545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Kim HS; Kim H; Kwon W; Han Y; Byun Y; Kang JS; Choi YJ; Jang JY
Surg Endosc; 2021 Apr; 35(4):1675-1681. PubMed ID: 32277354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. [Comparative study of clinical outcomes of robot versus laparoscopic radical surgery for rectal cancer based on propensity score matching].
Ye SP; Shi J; Liu DN; Jiang QG; Lei X; Tang C; Qiu H; Li TY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 57(6):447-451. PubMed ID: 31142070
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. [Prognostic value of the tumor deposit in N0 gastric cancer by propensity score matching analysis].
Zhi C; Yang W; Li N; Zhang Z; Hua Y; Liu H
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):172-179. PubMed ID: 30799540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. [Perioperative efficacy of laparoscopic duodenal-preserving pancreatic head resection].
Yin TY; Wang XX; Zhang H; Guo XJ; Wang M; Qin RY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2024 May; 62(7):671-676. PubMed ID: 38808434
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Association of Histopathologic Phenotype of Periampullary Adenocarcinomas With Survival.
Williams JL; Chan CK; Toste PA; Elliott IA; Vasquez CR; Sunjaya DB; Swanson EA; Koo J; Hines OJ; Reber HA; Dawson DW; Donahue TR
JAMA Surg; 2017 Jan; 152(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 27732711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [The beginnings and evolution of a pancreatic surgeon: a technical morphological analysis in first 5 years].
Yin HL; Pu N; Chen QD; Zhang JC; Xu YL; Shi CY; Lyu MZ; Lou WH; Wu WC
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 61(6):511-518. PubMed ID: 37088485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. [Minimally invasive enucleation for benign and low-grade malignant pancreatic tumors: an analysis of 60 cases].
Liu MQ; Liu WS; Li Z; Zhuo QF; Ji SR; Xu WY; Shi YH; Yu XJ; Xu XW
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jul; 60(7):674-679. PubMed ID: 35775260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Is Pancreaticoduodenectomy Feasible for Recurrent Remnant Bile Duct Cancer Following Bile Duct Segmental Resection?
Lee JG; Lee SH; Lim JH; Park JS; Yoon DS; Kim KS
J Gastrointest Surg; 2015 Dec; 19(12):2138-45. PubMed ID: 26341821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for tumors of the head of pancreas; 10 cases for a single center experience.
Caruso F; Alessandri G; Cesana G; Castello G; Uccelli M; Ciccarese F; Giorgi R; Villa R; Scotto B; Olmi S
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2017 Oct; 21(17):3745-3753. PubMed ID: 28975996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Anatomy of the head of the pancreas and various limited resection procedures for intraductal papillary-mucinous tumors of the pancreas].
Kimura W
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jun; 104(6):460-70. PubMed ID: 12854493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. [The comparison of prognosis and risk factors after radical resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma between China Pancreas Data Center and SEER].
Hu H; Qu C; Tian XD; Yang YM
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Sep; 59(9):773-779. PubMed ID: 34404176
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study. Lymphadenectomy Study Group.
Pedrazzoli S; DiCarlo V; Dionigi R; Mosca F; Pederzoli P; Pasquali C; Klöppel G; Dhaene K; Michelassi F
Ann Surg; 1998 Oct; 228(4):508-17. PubMed ID: 9790340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a retrospective single-center study].
Lin XC; Huang HG; Chen YC; Lu FC; Lin RG; Yang YY; Wang CF; Fang HZ
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 57(2):102-107. PubMed ID: 30704212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Rates of Serious Complications Estimated by the ACS-NSQIP Surgical Risk Calculator in Predicting Oncologic Outcomes of Patients Treated with Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Cancer.
Choi M; Kang CM; Chong JU; Hwang HK; Yoon DS; Lee WJ
J Gastrointest Surg; 2019 Jun; 23(6):1180-1187. PubMed ID: 30465189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of postoperative complications and long-term oncological outcomes in minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for distal cholangiocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched analysis.
Kim SH; Lee B; Hwang HK; Lee JS; Han HS; Lee WJ; Yoon YS; Kang CM
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2022 Mar; 29(3):329-337. PubMed ID: 34717038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Resection margin involvement and tumour origin in pancreatic head cancer.
Verbeke CS; Gladhaug IP
Br J Surg; 2012 Aug; 99(8):1036-49. PubMed ID: 22517199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Favourable prognostic factors in a large UK experience of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas and periampullary region.
Jarufe NP; Coldham C; Mayer AD; Mirza DF; Buckels JA; Bramhall SR
Dig Surg; 2004; 21(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 15218236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. [Curative effect analysis of bile reinfusion combined with enteral nutrition support before surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma].
Song P; Mao L; Bian XJ; Zhou T; Fan YY; Zhang J; Xie M; Qiu YD
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2018 May; 56(5):367-373. PubMed ID: 29779313
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
