182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35012523)
21. Colposcopy, cervicography, speculoscopy and endoscopy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
van Niekerk WA; Dunton CJ; Richart RM; Hilgarth M; Kato H; Kaufman RH; Mango LJ; Nozawa S; Robinowitz M
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):33-49. PubMed ID: 9479322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. [Value of 4-quadrant biopsies under colposcopy for detecting precancerous lesions in cervical cancer screening].
Zhao Y; Song Y; Zhao F; Zhang W; Li L; Chen F; Chen W; Pan Q; Shen G; Qiao Y
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2015 Nov; 37(11):875-9. PubMed ID: 26887523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The degree of agreement between HPV testing, pap smear and colposcopy in cervical dysplasia diagnosis.
Melinte-Popescu A; Costăchescu G
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2012; 116(2):536-9. PubMed ID: 23077949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Efficacy of photodynamic therapy with 5-aminolevulinic acid for the treatment of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions with high-risk HPV infection: A retrospective study.
Qu Z; Wang Z; Qiu S; Cui G; Li C
Photodiagnosis Photodyn Ther; 2022 Dec; 40():103068. PubMed ID: 36002107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Analysis of natural regression and influencing factors of HSIL in the cervix of childbearing age patients].
Wu MX; He XM; You ZX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jul; 58(7):516-525. PubMed ID: 37474325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Colposcopic performance in a birth cohort previously eligible for human papillomavirus vaccination.
Sahlgren HAI; Elfgren K; Sparen P; Elfstrom MK
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 May; 226(5):704.e1-704.e9. PubMed ID: 34954217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Diagnostic Utility of Endocervical Curettage During Colposcopy Among Patients of Varying Risk Factors.
Wang SM; Hoeppner C; Kazma J; Keegan E; Werner L; Chappell NP
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2022 Oct; 26(4):298-303. PubMed ID: 36074131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Analysis of the missed diagnosis of invasive carcinoma under the microscope in HSIL diagnosed by colposcopy-guided biopsy and related influencing factors].
Qian XY; You ZX; Cao QW; Zou BB; Xing Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Sep; 53(9):613-619. PubMed ID: 30293297
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the diagnostic value of cervical cytology and HPV HR DNA testing for the diagnosis of low-grade and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions across different age groups.
Paluszkiewicz A; Pruski D; Iwaniec K; Kędzia W
Ginekol Pol; 2017; 88(3):141-146. PubMed ID: 28397203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Predicting absolute risk of CIN3 during post-colposcopic follow-up: results from the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study (ALTS).
Walker JL; Wang SS; Schiffman M; Solomon D;
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 195(2):341-8. PubMed ID: 16890545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Agreement between colposcopic diagnosis with 2011 international terminology of colposcopy and cervical pathology in cervical lesions].
Li Y; Zhang H; Zheng R; Xie F; Sui L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 May; 50(5):361-6. PubMed ID: 26311456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prevalence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions and cervical cancer among patients with unsatisfactory colposcopic examination, without visible lesion.
Veiga FR; Russomano FB; Camargo MJ; Monteiro AC; Tristão A; Silva GV
Sao Paulo Med J; 2009 Sep; 127(5):266-9. PubMed ID: 20169274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Screen-and-treat approach in managing cervical cancer precursor lesions: An observational study with 524 women.
Yoneda JY; Teixeira JC; Derchain S; Bragança JF; Zeferino LC; Vale DB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2023 Jan; 280():78-82. PubMed ID: 36434824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy of colposcopic findings in detecting vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective study.
Stuebs FA; Koch MC; Mehlhorn G; Gass P; Schulmeyer CE; Hartman A; Strehl J; Adler W; Beckmann MW; Renner SK
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Mar; 301(3):769-777. PubMed ID: 31993733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Colposcopy, cytology and HPV-DNA testing in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women.
Torrisi A; Del Mistro A; Onnis GL; Merlin F; Bertorelle R; Minucci D
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2000; 21(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 10843478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Clinical analysis of cervical intraepithelial lesion in postmenopausal women].
Zhang X; Guan XJ; Li JQ; Zhang LH; Yang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Oct; 53(10):705-710. PubMed ID: 30369128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The impact of using electrical impedance spectroscopy (ZedScan) on the performance of colposcopy in diagnosing high grade squamous lesions of the cervix.
Muszynski C; Dupont E; Vaysse B; Lanta S; Tidy J; Sergent F; Gondry J
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 46(9):669-673. PubMed ID: 28866125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Diagnostic value of the 2011 International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy Terminology in predicting cervical lesions.
Fan A; Wang C; Zhang L; Yan Y; Han C; Xue F
Oncotarget; 2018 Feb; 9(10):9166-9176. PubMed ID: 29507681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Visual appearance of the uterine cervix differs on the basis of HPV type status in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: the results of a reliable method.
Zhou Q; Gong Y; Qiu X; Sui L; Zhang H; Wang Y; Lin L; Diao W; Li Y
BMC Womens Health; 2022 Jan; 22(1):24. PubMed ID: 35094702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Regression of cervical high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL/CIN2) managed expectantly.
Nourrisson A; Lepetit H; Marty M; Garrigue I; Brun JL
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102442. PubMed ID: 35842125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
