217 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35013496)
1. Ensemble learning from ensemble docking: revisiting the optimum ensemble size problem.
Mohammadi S; Narimani Z; Ashouri M; Firouzi R; Karimi-Jafari MH
Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):410. PubMed ID: 35013496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ensemble-based docking using biased molecular dynamics.
Campbell AJ; Lamb ML; Joseph-McCarthy D
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jul; 54(7):2127-38. PubMed ID: 24881672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing an ensemble docking-based virtual screening strategy for kinase targets by considering protein flexibility.
Tian S; Sun H; Pan P; Li D; Zhen X; Li Y; Hou T
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2664-79. PubMed ID: 25233367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A flexible-protein molecular docking study of the binding of ruthenium complex compounds to PIM1, GSK-3β, and CDK2/Cyclin A protein kinases.
Liu Y; Agrawal NJ; Radhakrishnan R
J Mol Model; 2013 Jan; 19(1):371-82. PubMed ID: 22926267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving Structure-Based Virtual Screening with Ensemble Docking and Machine Learning.
Ricci-Lopez J; Aguila SA; Gilson MK; Brizuela CA
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Nov; 61(11):5362-5376. PubMed ID: 34652141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nonlinear scoring functions for similarity-based ligand docking and binding affinity prediction.
Brylinski M
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Nov; 53(11):3097-112. PubMed ID: 24171431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Higher Accuracy Achieved for Protein-Ligand Binding Pose Prediction by Elastic Network Model-Based Ensemble Docking.
Wang A; Zhang Y; Chu H; Liao C; Zhang Z; Li G
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Jun; 60(6):2939-2950. PubMed ID: 32383873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
Cleves AE; Jain AN
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using machine learning to improve ensemble docking for drug discovery.
Chandak T; Mayginnes JP; Mayes H; Wong CF
Proteins; 2020 Oct; 88(10):1263-1270. PubMed ID: 32401384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Binding Activity Prediction of Cyclin-Dependent Inhibitors.
Saha I; Rak B; Bhowmick SS; Maulik U; Bhattacharjee D; Koch U; Lazniewski M; Plewczynski D
J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1469-82. PubMed ID: 26079845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rescoring of docking poses under Occam's Razor: are there simpler solutions?
Zhenin M; Bahia MS; Marcou G; Varnek A; Senderowitz H; Horvath D
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Sep; 32(9):877-888. PubMed ID: 30173397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Machine learning in computational docking.
Khamis MA; Gomaa W; Ahmed WF
Artif Intell Med; 2015 Mar; 63(3):135-52. PubMed ID: 25724101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Plasticity of the Binding Site of Renin: Optimized Selection of Protein Structures for Ensemble Docking.
Strecker C; Meyer B
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 May; 58(5):1121-1131. PubMed ID: 29683661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking.
Huang SY; Zou X
Proteins; 2007 Feb; 66(2):399-421. PubMed ID: 17096427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Task-Specific Scoring Functions for Predicting Ligand Binding Poses and Affinity and for Screening Enrichment.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Jan; 58(1):119-133. PubMed ID: 29190087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Using the Semiempirical Quantum Mechanics in Improving the Molecular Docking: A Case Study with CDK2.
Bagheri S; Behnejad H; Firouzi R; Karimi-Jafari MH
Mol Inform; 2020 Sep; 39(9):e2000036. PubMed ID: 32485047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Supervised machine learning techniques to predict binding affinity. A study for cyclin-dependent kinase 2.
de Ávila MB; Xavier MM; Pintro VO; de Azevedo WF
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2017 Dec; 494(1-2):305-310. PubMed ID: 29017921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
