These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35013993)

  • 1. Reward learning and statistical learning independently influence attentional priority of salient distractors in visual search.
    Le Pelley ME; Ung R; Mine C; Most SB; Watson P; Pearson D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Jul; 84(5):1446-1459. PubMed ID: 35013993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Statistical learning of distractor shape modulates attentional capture.
    Kim H; Ogden A; Anderson BA
    Vision Res; 2023 Jan; 202():108155. PubMed ID: 36417810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention: Evidence for independent sources of bias.
    Kim H; Anderson BA
    Cognition; 2021 Mar; 208():104554. PubMed ID: 33360961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combined influence of valence and statistical learning on the control of attention II: Evidence from within-domain additivity.
    Ogden A; Kim H; Anderson BA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2023 Feb; 85(2):277-283. PubMed ID: 36536205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distractors less salient than targets capture attention rather than producing non-spatial filtering costs.
    Koch AI; Müller HJ; Zehetleitner M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 23747508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. More capture, more suppression: Distractor suppression due to statistical regularities is determined by the magnitude of attentional capture.
    Failing M; Theeuwes J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Feb; 27(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 31848910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture.
    Anderson BA; Laurent PA; Yantis S
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e27926. PubMed ID: 22132170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical regularities cause attentional suppression with target-matching distractors.
    Kerzel D; Huynh Cong S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 Jan; 83(1):270-282. PubMed ID: 33251562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spatial suppression due to statistical regularities in a visual detection task.
    van Moorselaar D; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Feb; 84(2):450-458. PubMed ID: 34773244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-capture processes contribute to statistical learning of distractor locations in visual search.
    Sauter M; Hanning NM; Liesefeld HR; Müller HJ
    Cortex; 2021 Feb; 135():108-126. PubMed ID: 33360756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Value-modulated attentional capture is augmented by win-related sensory cues.
    Pearson D; Piao M; Le Pelley ME
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2024 Jan; 77(1):133-143. PubMed ID: 36803153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Salience-based selection: attentional capture by distractors less salient than the target.
    Zehetleitner M; Koch AI; Goschy H; Müller HJ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(1):e52595. PubMed ID: 23382820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suppression of a salient distractor protects the processing of target features.
    Narhi-Martinez W; Dube B; Chen J; Leber AB; Golomb JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2024 Feb; 31(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 37528277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perceptual Competition Promotes Suppression of Reward Salience in Behavioral Selection and Neural Representation.
    Gong M; Jia K; Li S
    J Neurosci; 2017 Jun; 37(26):6242-6252. PubMed ID: 28539425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical learning of target and distractor spatial probability shape a common attentional priority computation.
    Ferrante O; Chelazzi L; Santandrea E
    Cortex; 2023 Dec; 169():95-117. PubMed ID: 37866062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Capture or suppression? Attentional allocation upon reward and loss-associated nonsalient distractors are supported by distinct neural mechanisms: An EEG study.
    Jiang Y; Cui C; Liu M; Zhang X
    Neuropsychologia; 2021 Jul; 157():107879. PubMed ID: 33957194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical regularities modulate attentional capture independent of search strategy.
    Wang B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1763-1774. PubMed ID: 29968080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Overt attentional capture by reward-related stimuli overcomes inhibitory suppression.
    Pearson D; Watson P; Cheng PX; Le Pelley ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2020 May; 46(5):489-501. PubMed ID: 32191108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pavlovian reward learning underlies value driven attentional capture.
    Bucker B; Theeuwes J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Feb; 79(2):415-428. PubMed ID: 27905069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.