737 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35014355)
1. Cell-Laden Nanocellulose/Chitosan-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Enhanced Osteogenic Cell Differentiation.
Maturavongsadit P; Narayanan LK; Chansoria P; Shirwaiker R; Benhabbour SR
ACS Appl Bio Mater; 2021 Mar; 4(3):2342-2353. PubMed ID: 35014355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Alginate-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Fabrication of Anatomically Accurate Bone Grafts.
Gonzalez-Fernandez T; Tenorio AJ; Campbell KT; Silva EA; Leach JK
Tissue Eng Part A; 2021 Sep; 27(17-18):1168-1181. PubMed ID: 33218292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An osteogenic bioink composed of alginate, cellulose nanofibrils, and polydopamine nanoparticles for 3D bioprinting and bone tissue engineering.
Im S; Choe G; Seok JM; Yeo SJ; Lee JH; Kim WD; Lee JY; Park SA
Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 Apr; 205():520-529. PubMed ID: 35217077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multifunctional bioactive chitosan/cellulose nanocrystal scaffolds eradicate bacterial growth and sustain drug delivery.
Patel DK; Dutta SD; Ganguly K; Lim KT
Int J Biol Macromol; 2021 Feb; 170():178-188. PubMed ID: 33359257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Printability of pulp derived crystal, fibril and blend nanocellulose-alginate bioinks for extrusion 3D bioprinting.
Jessop ZM; Al-Sabah A; Gao N; Kyle S; Thomas B; Badiei N; Hawkins K; Whitaker IS
Biofabrication; 2019 Jul; 11(4):045006. PubMed ID: 30743252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. 3D-bioprinted functional and biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds incorporated with nanosilicates to promote bone healing in rat calvarial defect model.
Liu B; Li J; Lei X; Cheng P; Song Y; Gao Y; Hu J; Wang C; Zhang S; Li D; Wu H; Sang H; Bi L; Pei G
Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2020 Jul; 112():110905. PubMed ID: 32409059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Optimization of mechanical stiffness and cell density of 3D bioprinted cell-laden scaffolds improves extracellular matrix mineralization and cellular organization for bone tissue engineering.
Zhang J; Wehrle E; Adamek P; Paul GR; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 114():307-322. PubMed ID: 32673752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wood-based nanocellulose and bioactive glass modified gelatin-alginate bioinks for 3D bioprinting of bone cells.
Ojansivu M; Rashad A; Ahlinder A; Massera J; Mishra A; Syverud K; Finne-Wistrand A; Miettinen S; Mustafa K
Biofabrication; 2019 Apr; 11(3):035010. PubMed ID: 30754034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. GelMA/bioactive silica nanocomposite bioinks for stem cell osteogenic differentiation.
Tavares MT; Gaspar VM; Monteiro MV; S Farinha JP; Baleizão C; Mano JF
Biofabrication; 2021 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33455952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Formulation of chitosan and chitosan-nanoHAp bioinks and investigation of printability with optimized bioprinting parameters.
Coşkun S; Akbulut SO; Sarıkaya B; Çakmak S; Gümüşderelioğlu M
Int J Biol Macromol; 2022 Dec; 222(Pt A):1453-1464. PubMed ID: 36113600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nanocomposite bioinks for 3D bioprinting.
Cai Y; Chang SY; Gan SW; Ma S; Lu WF; Yen CC
Acta Biomater; 2022 Oct; 151():45-69. PubMed ID: 35970479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair.
Alcala-Orozco CR; Mutreja I; Cui X; Hooper GJ; Lim KS; Woodfield TBF
Bone; 2022 Jan; 154():116198. PubMed ID: 34534709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gradient Poly(ethylene glycol) Diacrylate and Cellulose Nanocrystals Tissue Engineering Composite Scaffolds via Extrusion Bioprinting.
Frost BA; Sutliff BP; Thayer P; Bortner MJ; Foster EJ
Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2019; 7():280. PubMed ID: 31681754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A rheological approach to assess the printability of thermosensitive chitosan-based biomaterial inks.
Rahimnejad M; Labonté-Dupuis T; Demarquette NR; Lerouge S
Biomed Mater; 2020 Nov; 16(1):015003. PubMed ID: 33245047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Advancing bioinks for 3D bioprinting using reactive fillers: A review.
Heid S; Boccaccini AR
Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 113():1-22. PubMed ID: 32622053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 3D bioprinting of graphene oxide-incorporated cell-laden bone mimicking scaffolds for promoting scaffold fidelity, osteogenic differentiation and mineralization.
Zhang J; Eyisoylu H; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2021 Feb; 121():637-652. PubMed ID: 33326888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Egg white improves the biological properties of an alginate-methylcellulose bioink for 3D bioprinting of volumetric bone constructs.
Liu S; Kilian D; Ahlfeld T; Hu Q; Gelinsky M
Biofabrication; 2023 Feb; 15(2):. PubMed ID: 36735961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nanofibrous polyelectrolyte complex incorporated BSA-alginate composite bioink for 3D bioprinting of bone mimicking constructs.
Chrungoo S; Bharadwaj T; Verma D
Int J Biol Macromol; 2024 May; 266(Pt 1):131123. PubMed ID: 38537853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Tuning thermoresponsive properties of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC)-agarose composite bioinks to fabricate complex 3D constructs for regenerative medicine.
Budharaju H; Chandrababu H; Zennifer A; Chellappan D; Sethuraman S; Sundaramurthi D
Int J Biol Macromol; 2024 Mar; 260(Pt 1):129443. PubMed ID: 38228200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.
Deo KA; Singh KA; Peak CW; Alge DL; Gaharwar AK
Tissue Eng Part A; 2020 Mar; 26(5-6):318-338. PubMed ID: 32079490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
