These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35015110)

  • 1. The impact of stimulus format on task inhibition during task switching.
    Sdoia S; Zivi P; Ferlazzo F
    Psychol Res; 2022 Oct; 86(7):2185-2194. PubMed ID: 35015110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Inhibition, interference, and conflict in task switching.
    Costa RE; Friedrich FJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1193-201. PubMed ID: 22918561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibition during task switching is affected by the number of competing tasks.
    Scheil J; Kleinsorge T
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):211-224. PubMed ID: 37698800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Arabic digits and spoken number words: Timing modulates the cross-modal numerical distance effect.
    Lin CY; Göbel SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Nov; 72(11):2632-2646. PubMed ID: 31096864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Further investigating effects of task repetition proportion on
    Scheil J; Kleinsorge T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1629-1639. PubMed ID: 32238035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task switching and the measurement of "switch costs".
    Wylie G; Allport A
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(3-4):212-33. PubMed ID: 11004877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cueing effects on semantic and perceptual categorization: ERPs reveal differential effects of validity as a function of processing stage.
    Lai G; Mangels JA
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 May; 45(9):2038-50. PubMed ID: 17382975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Controlling response order without relying on stimulus order - evidence for flexible representations of task order.
    Kürten J; Strobach T; Huestegge L
    Psychol Res; 2024 Jul; 88(5):1712-1726. PubMed ID: 38613570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Asymmetries in the processing of Arabic digits and number words.
    Damian MF
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):164-71. PubMed ID: 15078053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phonological activation improves semantic access provided by Arabic digits and number words.
    Han H; Wang R; Cui Z; Zhou X
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):997-1010. PubMed ID: 36449248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cognitive control in number processing: new evidence from number compatibility effects in task-switching.
    Schliephake A; Bahnmueller J; Willmes K; Koch I; Moeller K
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 35133537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus-related inhibition of task set during task switching.
    Sdoia S; Ferlazzo F
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(5):322-7. PubMed ID: 25116299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Shifting the set of stimulus selection when switching between tasks.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    Psychol Res; 2018 Jan; 82(1):134-145. PubMed ID: 28752317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Episodic and semantic components of the compound-stimulus strategy in the explicit task-cuing procedure.
    Arrington CM; Logan GD
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Sep; 32(6):965-78. PubMed ID: 15673184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Attentional modulation of masked semantic priming by visible and masked task cues.
    Kiefer M; Trumpp NM; Schaitz C; Reuss H; Kunde W
    Cognition; 2019 Jun; 187():62-77. PubMed ID: 30836302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dissociating stimulus-set and response-set in the context of task-set switching.
    Kieffaber PD; Kruschke JK; Cho RY; Walker PM; Hetrick WP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Jun; 39(3):700-19. PubMed ID: 22984990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Is it harder to switch among a larger set of tasks?
    van 't Wout F; Lavric A; Monsell S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):363-76. PubMed ID: 25528089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of a dynamically changing response set overlap on n - 2 repetition costs.
    Scheil J; Kleinsorge T
    Psychol Res; 2023 Oct; 87(7):2275-2282. PubMed ID: 36949242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impaired color word processing at an unattended location: evidence from a Stroop task combined with inhibition of return.
    Choi JM; Cho YS; Proctor RW
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Sep; 37(6):935-44. PubMed ID: 19679871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue type affects preparatory influences on task inhibition.
    Gade M; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 May; 148():12-8. PubMed ID: 24486802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.