These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35015158)

  • 1. The environmental performance of different pork production scenarios: a life cycle assessment study.
    Villavicencio-Gutiérrez MR; Rogers-Montoya NA; Martínez-Campos R; Gómez-Tenorio G; Martínez-Castañeda FE
    Trop Anim Health Prod; 2022 Jan; 54(1):44. PubMed ID: 35015158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Economic and environmental assessments of combined genetics and nutrition optimization strategies to improve the efficiency of sustainable pork production.
    Soleimani T; Hermesch S; Gilbert H
    J Anim Sci; 2021 Mar; 99(3):. PubMed ID: 33587146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Reducing environmental impacts of feed using multiobjective formulation: What benefits at the farm gate for pig and broiler production?
    Méda B; Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Ponchant P; Espagnol S; Wilfart A
    Animal; 2021 Jan; 15(1):100024. PubMed ID: 33750548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a food-production system in Spain: Iberian ham based on an extensive system.
    Lamnatou C; Ezcurra-Ciaurriz X; Chemisana D; Plà-Aragonés LM
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Feb; 808():151900. PubMed ID: 34838553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lower pork consumption and technological change in feed production can reduce the pork supply chain environmental footprint in China.
    Tong B; Zhang L; Hou Y; Oenema O; Long W; Velthof G; Ma W; Zhang F
    Nat Food; 2023 Jan; 4(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 37118572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating environmental impacts of selection for residual feed intake in pigs.
    Soleimani T; Gilbert H
    Animal; 2020 Dec; 14(12):2598-2608. PubMed ID: 32624079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Review: Pork quality attributes from farm to fork. Part I. Carcass and fresh meat.
    Lebret B; Čandek-Potokar M
    Animal; 2022 Feb; 16 Suppl 1():100402. PubMed ID: 34836808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Can we associate environmental footprints with production and consumption using Monte Carlo simulation? Case study with pork meat.
    Djekic I; Bozickovic I; Djordjevic V; Smetana S; Terjung N; Ilic J; Doroski A; Tomasevic I
    J Sci Food Agric; 2021 Feb; 101(3):960-969. PubMed ID: 32748951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A flexible tool for the assessment of the economic cost of pig disease in growers and finishers at farm level.
    Pfuderer S; Bennett RM; Brown A; Collins LM
    Prev Vet Med; 2022 Nov; 208():105757. PubMed ID: 36179554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multiobjective formulation is an effective method to reduce environmental impacts of livestock feeds.
    Garcia-Launay F; Dusart L; Espagnol S; Laisse-Redoux S; Gaudré D; Méda B; Wilfart A
    Br J Nutr; 2018 Dec; 120(11):1298-1309. PubMed ID: 30378514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Life-cycle comparisons of economic and environmental consequences for pig production with four different models in China.
    Wu H; Liu Y; Dai C; Ye Y; Zhu H; Fang W
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; 31(14):21668-21686. PubMed ID: 38393572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Life cycle assessment of pasture-based suckler steer weanling-to-beef production systems: Effect of breed and slaughter age.
    Herron J; Curran TP; Moloney AP; McGee M; O'Riordan EG; O'Brien D
    Animal; 2021 Jul; 15(7):100247. PubMed ID: 34102434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Towards a more comprehensive life cycle assessment framework for assessing toxicity-related impacts for livestock products: The case of Danish pork.
    Dorca-Preda T; Fantke P; Mogensen L; Knudsen MT
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Apr; 815():152811. PubMed ID: 34990685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of feeding strategy on environmental impacts of pig fattening in different contexts of production: evaluation through life cycle assessment.
    Monteiro AN; Garcia-Launay F; Brossard L; Wilfart A; Dourmad JY
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Nov; 94(11):4832-4847. PubMed ID: 27898927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Environmental impacts of medium-scale pig farming at technical and economic optimum production weight in Mexico.
    Del Rosario Villavicencio-Gutiérrez M; Martínez-Castañeda FE; Rogers-Montoya NA; Martínez-Campos AR; Gómez-Tenorio G; Velazquez L; Peñuelas-Rivas CG
    Sci Total Environ; 2024 Oct; 946():174240. PubMed ID: 38925383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Meta-analysis of the potential of Kazakhstani pork in the global market of meat products: Problems and prospects.
    Dambaulova GK; Lilimberg SI; Madin VA; Abdrakhmanova GT
    Vet World; 2022 Nov; 15(11):2705-2714. PubMed ID: 36590119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Description, evaluation, and validation of the Teagasc Pig Production Model1.
    Calderón Díaz JA; Shalloo L; Niemi JK; Kyriazakis I; McKeon M; McCutcheon G; Bohan A; Manzanilla EG
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2803-2821. PubMed ID: 31077274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of interactions between feeding practices, animal health and farm infrastructure on technical, economic and environmental performances of a pig-fattening unit.
    Cadéro A; Aubry A; Dourmad JY; Salaün Y; Garcia-Launay F
    Animal; 2020 Aug; 14(S2):s348-s359. PubMed ID: 32122427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Eco-Friendly Feed Formulation and On-Farm Feed Production as Ways to Reduce the Environmental Impacts of Pig Production Without Consequences on Animal Performance.
    de Quelen F; Brossard L; Wilfart A; Dourmad JY; Garcia-Launay F
    Front Vet Sci; 2021; 8():689012. PubMed ID: 34295934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modelling interactions between farmer practices and fattening pig performances with an individual-based model.
    Cadéro A; Aubry A; Brossard L; Dourmad JY; Salaün Y; Garcia-Launay F
    Animal; 2018 Jun; 12(6):1277-1286. PubMed ID: 29143701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.