BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35015180)

  • 1. Mammographic Density Assessment by Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Assisted Diagnosis: A Comparison with Automated Volumetric Assessment.
    Lee SE; Son NH; Kim MH; Kim EK
    J Digit Imaging; 2022 Apr; 35(2):173-179. PubMed ID: 35015180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammographic density assessment: comparison of radiologists, automated volumetric measurement, and artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis.
    Eom HJ; Cha JH; Choi WJ; Cho SM; Jin K; Kim HH
    Acta Radiol; 2024 Jun; ():2841851241257794. PubMed ID: 38825883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Positive Predictive Values of Abnormality Scores From a Commercial Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis for Mammography.
    Lee SE; Hong H; Kim EK
    Korean J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 25(4):343-350. PubMed ID: 38528692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of breast density assessment between human eye and automated software on digital and synthetic mammography: Impact on breast cancer risk.
    Le Boulc'h M; Bekhouche A; Kermarrec E; Milon A; Abdel Wahab C; Zilberman S; Chabbert-Buffet N; Thomassin-Naggara I
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2020 Dec; 101(12):811-819. PubMed ID: 32819886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The added value of an artificial intelligence system in assisting radiologists on indeterminate BI-RADS 0 mammograms.
    Yi C; Tang Y; Ouyang R; Zhang Y; Cao Z; Yang Z; Wu S; Han M; Xiao J; Chang P; Ma J
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Mar; 32(3):1528-1537. PubMed ID: 34528107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis on the screening outcomes of digital mammography: a matched cohort study.
    Kim H; Choi JS; Kim K; Ko ES; Ko EY; Han BK
    Eur Radiol; 2023 Oct; 33(10):7186-7198. PubMed ID: 37188881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mammographic Surveillance After Breast-Conserving Therapy: Impact of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis and Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection.
    Yoon JH; Kim EK; Kim GR; Han K; Moon HJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Jan; 218(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 34378399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Automated Volumetric Breast Density Measurements in the Era of the BI-RADS Fifth Edition: A Comparison With Visual Assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2016 May; 206(5):1056-62. PubMed ID: 26934689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method: Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories.
    Singh T; Sharma M; Singla V; Khandelwal N
    Acad Radiol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 26521687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Application of artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis on synthetic mammograms from breast tomosynthesis: comparison with digital mammograms.
    Lee SE; Han K; Kim EK
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):6929-6937. PubMed ID: 33710372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measuring mammographic density: comparing a fully automated volumetric assessment versus European radiologists' qualitative classification.
    Sartor H; Lång K; Rosso A; Borgquist S; Zackrisson S; Timberg P
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Dec; 26(12):4354-4360. PubMed ID: 27011371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automation Bias in Mammography: The Impact of Artificial Intelligence BI-RADS Suggestions on Reader Performance.
    Dratsch T; Chen X; Rezazade Mehrizi M; Kloeckner R; Mähringer-Kunz A; Püsken M; Baeßler B; Sauer S; Maintz D; Pinto Dos Santos D
    Radiology; 2023 May; 307(4):e222176. PubMed ID: 37129490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Depiction of breast cancers on digital mammograms by artificial intelligence-based computer-assisted diagnosis according to cancer characteristics.
    Lee SE; Han K; Yoon JH; Youk JH; Kim EK
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Nov; 32(11):7400-7408. PubMed ID: 35499564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of variability in breast density assessment by BI-RADS category according to the level of experience.
    Eom HJ; Cha JH; Kang JW; Choi WJ; Kim HJ; Go E
    Acta Radiol; 2018 May; 59(5):527-532. PubMed ID: 28766978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fully automated measurements of volumetric breast density adapted for BIRADS 5th edition: a comparison with visual assessment.
    Youk JH; Gweon HM; Son EJ; Eun NL; Kim JA
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Sep; 62(9):1148-1154. PubMed ID: 32910685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic Performance of Artificial Intelligence-Based Computer-Aided Detection Software for Automated Breast Ultrasound.
    Kwon MR; Youn I; Lee MY; Lee HA
    Acad Radiol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):480-491. PubMed ID: 37813703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Artificial intelligence computer-aided detection enhances synthesized mammograms: comparison with original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in an experimental setting.
    Uematsu T; Nakashima K; Harada TL; Nasu H; Igarashi T
    Breast Cancer; 2023 Jan; 30(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 36001270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of Visual Assessment of Breast Density in BI-RADS 4th and 5th Editions With Automated Volumetric Measurement.
    Youk JH; Kim SJ; Son EJ; Gweon HM; Kim JA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Sep; 209(3):703-708. PubMed ID: 28657850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An Artificial Intelligence-based Mammography Screening Protocol for Breast Cancer: Outcome and Radiologist Workload.
    Lauritzen AD; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; von Euler-Chelpin MC; Lynge E; Vejborg I; Nielsen M; Karssemeijer N; Lillholm M
    Radiology; 2022 Jul; 304(1):41-49. PubMed ID: 35438561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of mammographic density estimation by Volpara software with radiologists' visual assessment: analysis of clinical-radiologic factors affecting discrepancy between them.
    Lee HN; Sohn YM; Han KH
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Sep; 56(9):1061-8. PubMed ID: 25338836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.