188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35015180)
21. Persistent inter-observer variability of breast density assessment using BI-RADS® 5th edition guidelines.
Portnow LH; Georgian-Smith D; Haider I; Barrios M; Bay CP; Nelson KP; Raza S
Clin Imaging; 2022 Mar; 83():21-27. PubMed ID: 34952487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A new automated method to evaluate 2D mammographic breast density according to BI-RADS® Atlas Fifth Edition recommendations.
Balleyguier C; Arfi-Rouche J; Boyer B; Gauthier E; Helin V; Loshkajian A; Ragusa S; Delaloge S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jul; 29(7):3830-3838. PubMed ID: 30770972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Breast Cancer Risk and Mammographic Density Assessed with Semiautomated and Fully Automated Methods and BI-RADS.
Jeffers AM; Sieh W; Lipson JA; Rothstein JH; McGuire V; Whittemore AS; Rubin DL
Radiology; 2017 Feb; 282(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 27598536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Use of novel artificial intelligence computer-assisted detection (AI-CAD) for screening mammography: an analysis of 17,884 consecutive two-view full-field digital mammography screening exams.
Heywang-Köbrunner SH; Hacker A; Jänsch A; Hertlein M; Mieskes C; Elsner S; Sinnatamby R; Katalinic A
Acta Radiol; 2023 Oct; 64(10):2697-2703. PubMed ID: 37642981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can artificial intelligence replace ultrasound as a complementary tool to mammogram for the diagnosis of the breast cancer?
Mansour S; Kamal R; Hashem L; AlKalaawy B
Br J Radiol; 2021 Dec; 94(1128):20210820. PubMed ID: 34613796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Classification of fatty and dense breast parenchyma: comparison of automatic volumetric density measurement and radiologists' classification and their inter-observer variation.
Østerås BH; Martinsen AC; Brandal SH; Chaudhry KN; Eben E; Haakenaasen U; Falk RS; Skaane P
Acta Radiol; 2016 Oct; 57(10):1178-85. PubMed ID: 26792823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. How does semi-automated computer-derived CT measure of breast density compare with subjective assessments to assess mean glandular breast density, in patients with breast cancer?
Bansal GJ; Kotugodella S
Br J Radiol; 2014 Dec; 87(1044):20140530. PubMed ID: 25373436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. AI-CAD for differentiating lesions presenting as calcifications only on mammography: outcome analysis incorporating the ACR BI-RADS descriptors for calcifications.
Yoon J; Lee HS; Kim MJ; Park VY; Kim EK; Yoon JH
Eur Radiol; 2022 Oct; 32(10):6565-6574. PubMed ID: 35748900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Deep-LIBRA: An artificial-intelligence method for robust quantification of breast density with independent validation in breast cancer risk assessment.
Haji Maghsoudi O; Gastounioti A; Scott C; Pantalone L; Wu FF; Cohen EA; Winham S; Conant EF; Vachon C; Kontos D
Med Image Anal; 2021 Oct; 73():102138. PubMed ID: 34274690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of artificial intelligence in breast cancer screening with mammography.
Dang LA; Chazard E; Poncelet E; Serb T; Rusu A; Pauwels X; Parsy C; Poclet T; Cauliez H; Engelaere C; Ramette G; Brienne C; Dujardin S; Laurent N
Breast Cancer; 2022 Nov; 29(6):967-977. PubMed ID: 35763243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison Between Digital and Synthetic 2D Mammograms in Breast Density Interpretation.
Alshafeiy TI; Wadih A; Nicholson BT; Rochman CM; Peppard HR; Patrie JT; Harvey JA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jul; 209(1):W36-W41. PubMed ID: 28504593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Reliability Comparison of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Mammography: Breast Density Assessment Referring to the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
Ma Y; Cao Y; Liu A; Yin L; Han P; Li H; Zhang X; Ye Z
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):752-759. PubMed ID: 30220584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk in the Saudi population: a case-control study using visual and automated methods.
Aloufi AS; AlNaeem AN; Almousa AS; Hashem AM; Malik MA; Altahan FM; Elsharkawi MM; Almasar KA; ElMahdy MH; Squires SE; Alzimami KS; Harkness EF; Astley SM
Br J Radiol; 2022 Jun; 95(1134):20211197. PubMed ID: 35195439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Inter-observer variability in mammographic density assessment using Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists (RANZCR) synoptic scales.
Damases CN; Mello-Thoms C; McEntee MF
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Jun; 60(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 27059785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Artificial intelligence assistance for women who had spot compression view: reducing recall rates for digital mammography.
Lee SE; Kim GR; Yoon JH; Han K; Son WJ; Shin HJ; Moon HJ
Acta Radiol; 2023 May; 64(5):1808-1815. PubMed ID: 36426409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Inter- and intraradiologist variability in the BI-RADS assessment and breast density categories for screening mammograms.
Redondo A; Comas M; Macià F; Ferrer F; Murta-Nascimento C; Maristany MT; Molins E; Sala M; Castells X
Br J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 85(1019):1465-70. PubMed ID: 22993385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.
Gweon HM; Youk JH; Kim JA; Son EJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Sep; 201(3):692-7. PubMed ID: 23971465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Artificial intelligence in breast imaging.
Le EPV; Wang Y; Huang Y; Hickman S; Gilbert FJ
Clin Radiol; 2019 May; 74(5):357-366. PubMed ID: 30898381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. External Evaluation of 3 Commercial Artificial Intelligence Algorithms for Independent Assessment of Screening Mammograms.
Salim M; Wåhlin E; Dembrower K; Azavedo E; Foukakis T; Liu Y; Smith K; Eklund M; Strand F
JAMA Oncol; 2020 Oct; 6(10):1581-1588. PubMed ID: 32852536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
