BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35015180)

  • 41. Comparison of Clinical and Automated Breast Density Measurements: Implications for Risk Prediction and Supplemental Screening.
    Brandt KR; Scott CG; Ma L; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Jensen MR; Whaley DH; Wu FF; Malkov S; Hruska CB; Norman AD; Heine J; Shepherd J; Pankratz VS; Kerlikowske K; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2016 Jun; 279(3):710-9. PubMed ID: 26694052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Evaluation of LIBRA Software for Fully Automated Mammographic Density Assessment in Breast Cancer Risk Prediction.
    Gastounioti A; Kasi CD; Scott CG; Brandt KR; Jensen MR; Hruska CB; Wu FF; Norman AD; Conant EF; Winham SJ; Kerlikowske K; Kontos D; Vachon CM
    Radiology; 2020 Jul; 296(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 32396041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mammographic density estimation with automated volumetric breast density measurement.
    Ko SY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ
    Korean J Radiol; 2014; 15(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 24843235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. PACS-integrated machine learning breast density classifier: clinical validation.
    Lewin J; Schoenherr S; Seebass M; Lin M; Philpotts L; Etesami M; Butler R; Durand M; Heller S; Heacock L; Moy L; Tocino I; Westerhoff M
    Clin Imaging; 2023 Sep; 101():200-205. PubMed ID: 37421715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Reduction of False-Positive Markings on Mammograms: a Retrospective Comparison Study Using an Artificial Intelligence-Based CAD.
    Mayo RC; Kent D; Sen LC; Kapoor M; Leung JWT; Watanabe AT
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):618-624. PubMed ID: 30963339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improved Cancer Detection Using Artificial Intelligence: a Retrospective Evaluation of Missed Cancers on Mammography.
    Watanabe AT; Lim V; Vu HX; Chim R; Weise E; Liu J; Bradley WG; Comstock CE
    J Digit Imaging; 2019 Aug; 32(4):625-637. PubMed ID: 31011956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Automated and Clinical Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Density Measures Predict Risk for Screen-Detected and Interval Cancers: A Case-Control Study.
    Kerlikowske K; Scott CG; Mahmoudzadeh AP; Ma L; Winham S; Jensen MR; Wu FF; Malkov S; Pankratz VS; Cummings SR; Shepherd JA; Brandt KR; Miglioretti DL; Vachon CM
    Ann Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 168(11):757-765. PubMed ID: 29710124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Measurement of breast density with digital breast tomosynthesis--a systematic review.
    Ekpo EU; McEntee MF
    Br J Radiol; 2014 Nov; 87(1043):20140460. PubMed ID: 25146640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Stand-Alone Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Retrospective Evaluation.
    Romero-Martín S; Elías-Cabot E; Raya-Povedano JL; Gubern-Mérida A; Rodríguez-Ruiz A; Álvarez-Benito M
    Radiology; 2022 Mar; 302(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34904872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Diagnostic Performance of AI for Cancers Registered in A Mammography Screening Program: A Retrospective Analysis.
    Kizildag Yirgin I; Koyluoglu YO; Seker ME; Ozkan Gurdal S; Ozaydin AN; Ozcinar B; Cabioğlu N; Ozmen V; Aribal E
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2022; 21():15330338221075172. PubMed ID: 35060413
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Understanding Clinical Mammographic Breast Density Assessment: a Deep Learning Perspective.
    Mohamed AA; Luo Y; Peng H; Jankowitz RC; Wu S
    J Digit Imaging; 2018 Aug; 31(4):387-392. PubMed ID: 28932980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Deep Learning: Clinical Implementation.
    Lehman CD; Yala A; Schuster T; Dontchos B; Bahl M; Swanson K; Barzilay R
    Radiology; 2019 Jan; 290(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 30325282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Improving the Performance of Radiologists Using Artificial Intelligence-Based Detection Support Software for Mammography: A Multi-Reader Study.
    Lee JH; Kim KH; Lee EH; Ahn JS; Ryu JK; Park YM; Shin GW; Kim YJ; Choi HY
    Korean J Radiol; 2022 May; 23(5):505-516. PubMed ID: 35434976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A deep learning-based automated diagnostic system for classifying mammographic lesions.
    Yamaguchi T; Inoue K; Tsunoda H; Uematsu T; Shinohara N; Mukai H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(27):e20977. PubMed ID: 32629712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Differences and similarities in false interpretations by AI CAD and radiologists in screening mammography.
    Salim M; Dembrower K; Eklund M; Smith K; Strand F
    Br J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 96(1151):20230210. PubMed ID: 37660400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A self-directed learning intervention for radiographers rating mammographic breast density.
    Ekpo EU; Hogg P; Wasike E; McEntee MF
    Radiography (Lond); 2017 Nov; 23(4):337-342. PubMed ID: 28965898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) Mammographic Density and Implications for Breast Density Reporting Legislation.
    Gard CC; Aiello Bowles EJ; Miglioretti DL; Taplin SH; Rutter CM
    Breast J; 2015; 21(5):481-9. PubMed ID: 26133090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Differing benefits of artificial intelligence-based computer-aided diagnosis for breast US according to workflow and experience level.
    Lee SE; Han K; Youk JH; Lee JE; Hwang JY; Rho M; Yoon J; Kim EK; Yoon JH
    Ultrasonography; 2022 Oct; 41(4):718-727. PubMed ID: 35850498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Multi-Institutional Assessment and Crowdsourcing Evaluation of Deep Learning for Automated Classification of Breast Density.
    Chang K; Beers AL; Brink L; Patel JB; Singh P; Arun NT; Hoebel KV; Gaw N; Shah M; Pisano ED; Tilkin M; Coombs LP; Dreyer KJ; Allen B; Agarwal S; Kalpathy-Cramer J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2020 Dec; 17(12):1653-1662. PubMed ID: 32592660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Consistency of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based Diagnostic Support Software in Short-term Digital Mammography Reimaging After Core Needle Biopsy.
    Youk JH; Han K; Lee SE; Kim EK
    J Digit Imaging; 2023 Oct; 36(5):1965-1973. PubMed ID: 37326891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.