BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3501592)

  • 1. Kinetic data analysis with a noisy input function.
    Huesman RH; Mazoyer BM
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Dec; 32(12):1569-79. PubMed ID: 3501592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Equivalent methods to analyse dynamic experiments in which the input function is noisy.
    Huesman RH
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Jan; 42(1):147-53. PubMed ID: 9015815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Selection of weighting factors for quantification of PET radioligand binding using simplified reference tissue models with noisy input functions.
    Normandin MD; Koeppe RA; Morris ED
    Phys Med Biol; 2012 Feb; 57(3):609-29. PubMed ID: 22241524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Blind estimation of compartmental model parameters.
    Di Bella EV; Clackdoyle R; Gullberg GT
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Mar; 44(3):765-80. PubMed ID: 10211809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A computer simulation study on the effects of input function measurement noise in tracer kinetic modeling with positron emission tomography (PET).
    Feng D; Wang X
    Comput Biol Med; 1993 Jan; 23(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 8467639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A new double modeling approach for dynamic cardiac PET studies using noise and spillover contaminated LV measurements.
    Feng D; Li X; Huang SC
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Mar; 43(3):319-27. PubMed ID: 8682545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Fast parametric imaging algorithm for dual-input biomedical system parameter estimation.
    Choi HC; Chen S; Feng D; Wong KP
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 16376452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How to deal with the high condition number of the noise covariance matrix of gravity field functionals synthesised from a satellite-only global gravity field model?
    Klees R; Slobbe DC; Farahani HH
    J Geod; 2019; 93(1):29-44. PubMed ID: 30872904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct least-squares estimation of spatiotemporal distributions from dynamic SPECT projections using a spatial segmentation and temporal B-splines.
    Reutter BW; Gullberg GT; Huesman RH
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 May; 19(5):434-50. PubMed ID: 11021687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Model dependency and estimation reliability in measurement of cerebral oxygen utilization rate with oxygen-15 and dynamic positron emission tomography.
    Huang SC; Feng DG; Phelps ME
    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab; 1986 Feb; 6(1):105-19. PubMed ID: 3484744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of non-uniform weighting in non-linear regression for pharmacokinetic neuroreceptor modelling.
    Thiele F; Buchert R
    Nucl Med Commun; 2008 Feb; 29(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 18094641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A tracer kinetic model for 18F-FHBG for quantitating herpes simplex virus type 1 thymidine kinase reporter gene expression in living animals using PET.
    Green LA; Nguyen K; Berenji B; Iyer M; Bauer E; Barrio JR; Namavari M; Satyamurthy N; Gambhir SS
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Sep; 45(9):1560-70. PubMed ID: 15347725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Error analysis on parameter estimates in the ligand-receptor model: application to parameter imaging using PET data.
    Millet P; Delforge J; Pappata S; Syrota A; Cinotti L
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Dec; 41(12):2739-56. PubMed ID: 8971966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New estimation methods that directly use the time accumulated counts in the input function in quantitative dynamic PET studies.
    Chen K; Huang SC; Feng D
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Nov; 39(11):2073-90. PubMed ID: 15560012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of Autoregressive Parameters from Noisy Observations Using Iterated Covariance Updates.
    Moon TK; Gunther JH
    Entropy (Basel); 2020 May; 22(5):. PubMed ID: 33286345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analytical propagation of errors in dynamic SPECT: estimators, degrading factors, bias and noise.
    Kadrmas DJ; DiBella EV; Huesman RH; Gullberg GT
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Aug; 44(8):1997-2014. PubMed ID: 10473210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity analysis of respiratory parameter uncertainties: impact of criterion function form and constraints.
    Lutchen KR
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 1990 Aug; 69(2):766-75. PubMed ID: 2228887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Blind identification of the kinetic parameters in three-compartment models.
    Riabkov DY; Di Bella EV
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):639-64. PubMed ID: 15070194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of Bayesian analysis of compartmental kinetic models in medical imaging.
    Sitek A; Li Q; El Fakhri G; Alpert NM
    Phys Med; 2016 Oct; 32(10):1252-1258. PubMed ID: 27692754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spectral Clustering Predicts Tumor Tissue Heterogeneity Using Dynamic
    Katiyar P; Divine MR; Kohlhofer U; Quintanilla-Martinez L; Schölkopf B; Pichler BJ; Disselhorst JA
    J Nucl Med; 2017 Apr; 58(4):651-657. PubMed ID: 27811120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.