BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 35017054)

  • 1. Subsidence and fusion performance of a 3D-printed porous interbody cage with stress-optimized body lattice and microporous endplates - a comprehensive mechanical and biological analysis.
    Fogel G; Martin N; Lynch K; Pelletier MH; Wills D; Wang T; Walsh WR; Williams GM; Malik J; Peng Y; Jekir M
    Spine J; 2022 Jun; 22(6):1028-1037. PubMed ID: 35017054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of subsidence performance among three modern porous lateral cage designs.
    Yee-Yanagishita C; Fogel G; Douglas B; Essayan G; Poojary B; Martin N; Williams GM; Peng Y; Jekir M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Oct; 99():105764. PubMed ID: 36130418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Choice of Spinal Interbody Fusion Cage Material and Design Influences Subsidence and Osseointegration Performance.
    Fogel G; Martin N; Williams GM; Unger J; Yee-Yanagishita C; Pelletier M; Walsh W; Peng Y; Jekir M
    World Neurosurg; 2022 Jun; 162():e626-e634. PubMed ID: 35346883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model.
    McGilvray KC; Easley J; Seim HB; Regan D; Berven SH; Hsu WK; Mroz TE; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2018 Jul; 18(7):1250-1260. PubMed ID: 29496624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early bone ingrowth and segmental stability of a trussed titanium cage versus a polyether ether ketone cage in an ovine lumbar interbody fusion model.
    Loenen ACY; Peters MJM; Bevers RTJ; Schaffrath C; van Haver E; Cuijpers VMJI; Rademakers T; van Rietbergen B; Willems PC; Arts JJ
    Spine J; 2022 Jan; 22(1):174-182. PubMed ID: 34274502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A lattice topology optimization of cervical interbody fusion cage and finite element comparison with ZK60 and Ti-6Al-4V cages.
    Sun J; Wang Q; Cai D; Gu W; Ma Y; Sun Y; Wei Y; Yuan F
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Apr; 22(1):390. PubMed ID: 33902500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does implantation site influence bone ingrowth into 3D-printed porous implants?
    Walsh WR; Pelletier MH; Wang T; Lovric V; Morberg P; Mobbs RJ
    Spine J; 2019 Nov; 19(11):1885-1898. PubMed ID: 31255790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Finite element model predicts the biomechanical performance of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with various porous additive manufactured cages.
    Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Xiang D; Liao Z; Liu W
    Comput Biol Med; 2018 Apr; 95():167-174. PubMed ID: 29501735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical Analysis of Porous Additive Manufactured Cages for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Zhang Z; Li H; Fogel GR; Liao Z; Li Y; Liu W
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Mar; 111():e581-e591. PubMed ID: 29288855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Schäfer J; Born C; Duda G; Haas NP; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Sep; 26(17):1850-7. PubMed ID: 11568693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Dynamic Interbody Cage Improves Bone Formation in Anterior Cervical Surgery: A Porcine Biomechanical Study.
    Yang SH; Xiao FR; Lai DM; Wei CK; Tsuang FY
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2021 Nov; 479(11):2547-2558. PubMed ID: 34343157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Undercut macrostructure topography on and within an interbody cage improves biomechanical stability and interbody fusion.
    Walsh WR; Pelletier M; Wills D; Wang T; Bannigan S; Vizesi F
    Spine J; 2020 Nov; 20(11):1876-1886. PubMed ID: 32645503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computational comparison of three posterior lumbar interbody fusion techniques by using porous titanium interbody cages with 50% porosity.
    Lee YH; Chung CJ; Wang CW; Peng YT; Chang CH; Chen CH; Chen YN; Li CT
    Comput Biol Med; 2016 Apr; 71():35-45. PubMed ID: 26874064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel 3D printed lattice structure titanium cages evaluated in an ovine model of interbody fusion.
    Johnson JW; Gadomski B; Labus K; Stewart H; Nelson B; Seim H; Regan D; von Stade D; Kelly C; Horne P; Gall K; Easley J
    JOR Spine; 2023 Sep; 6(3):e1268. PubMed ID: 37780834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. PEEK versus titanium cages in lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a comparative analysis of subsidence.
    Campbell PG; Cavanaugh DA; Nunley P; Utter PA; Kerr E; Wadhwa R; Stone M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2020 Sep; 49(3):E10. PubMed ID: 32871573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on a novel porous TiO2/glass ceramic--2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine].
    Korinth MC; Hero T; Pandorf T; Zell D
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Apr; 50(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 15884708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Vertebral Endplate Concavity in Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Tapered 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage versus Squared PEEK Cage.
    Segi N; Nakashima H; Shinjo R; Kagami Y; Machino M; Ito S; Ouchida J; Morishita K; Oishi R; Yamauchi I; Imagama S
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2023 Feb; 59(2):. PubMed ID: 36837573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Designing an anatomical contour titanium 3D-printed oblique lumbar interbody fusion cage with porous structure and embedded fixation screws for patients with osteoporosis.
    Lai PL; Huang SF; Wang HW; Liu PH; Lin CL
    Int J Bioprint; 2023; 9(5):772. PubMed ID: 37457946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feasibility of Non-window Three-Dimensional-Printed Porous Titanium Cage in Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Pilot Trial.
    Ham DW; Jung CW; Chang DG; Yang JJ; Song KS
    Clin Orthop Surg; 2023 Dec; 15(6):960-967. PubMed ID: 38045587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of Lumbar Interbody Fusion with 3D-Printed Porous Titanium Cage Versus Polyetheretherketone Cage in Treating Lumbar Degenerative Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Duan Y; Feng D; Li T; Wang Y; Jiang L; Huang Y
    World Neurosurg; 2024 Mar; 183():144-156. PubMed ID: 38145654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.